health plan choice;
consumer information;
preferences;
decision making;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objective. To examine (1) what people say is important to them in choosing a health plan; (2) the effect, if any, that giving health plan information has on what people say is important to them; and (3) the effect of preference elicitation methods on what people say is important. Data Sources/Study Settings. A random sample of 201 Wisconsin state employees who participated in a health plan choice experiment during the 1995 open enrollment period. Study Design. We designed a computer system to guide subjects through the review of information about health plan options. The system began by eliciting the stated preferences of the subjects before they viewed the information, at time 0. Subjects were given an opportunity to revise their preference structures first after viewing summary information about four health plans (time 1) and then after viewing more extensive, detailed information about the same options (time 2). At time 2, these individuals were also asked to rate the relative importance of a predefined list of health plan features presented to them. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Data were collected on the number of attributes listed at each point in time and the importance weightings assigned to each attribute. In addition, each item on the attribute list was content analyzed. Principal Finding. The provision of information changes the preference structures of individuals. Costs (price) and coverage dominated the attributes cited both before and after looking at health plan information. When presented with information on costs, quality, and how plans work, many of these relatively well educated consumers revised their preference structures; yet coverage and costs remained the primary cited attributes. Conclusions. Although efforts to provide health plan information should continue, decisions on the information to provide and on making it available are not enough. Individuals need help in understanding, processing, and using the information to construct their preferences and make better decisions.
机构:
Univ York, Dept Econ & Related Studies, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
LUISS, Rome, ItalyUniv York, Dept Econ & Related Studies, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
Hey, John D.
Morone, Andrea
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Bari, Bari, ItalyUniv York, Dept Econ & Related Studies, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
Morone, Andrea
Schmidt, Ulrich
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Kiel Inst World Econ, Kiel, GermanyUniv York, Dept Econ & Related Studies, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
机构:
ANACOM, Ave Jose Malhoa 12, P-1099017 Lisbon, Portugal
Catolica Lisbon Sch Business & Econ Palma de Cima, P-1649023 Lisbon, PortugalANACOM, Ave Jose Malhoa 12, P-1099017 Lisbon, Portugal
Confraria, Joao
Ribeiro, Tiago
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Indera Estudos Econ Lda, Rua Campo Alegre, P-134601415 Oporto, Portugal
Univ South Australia, Inst Choice, Level 13,140 Arthur St, Sydney, NSW 2060, AustraliaANACOM, Ave Jose Malhoa 12, P-1099017 Lisbon, Portugal
Ribeiro, Tiago
Vasconcelos, Helder
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
ANACOM, Ave Jose Malhoa 12, P-1099017 Lisbon, Portugal
Fac Econ Porto, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, P-4200464 Oporto, PortugalANACOM, Ave Jose Malhoa 12, P-1099017 Lisbon, Portugal