Turnitin and peer review in ESL academic writing classrooms

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Jinrong [1 ]
Li, Mimi [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Southern Univ, Dept Writing & Linguist, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ Commerce, Dept Literature & Languages, Commerce, TX USA
来源
LANGUAGE LEARNING & TECHNOLOGY | 2018年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
Writing; Feedback; Computer-Mediated Communication; Instructional Context; RESPONSE GROUPS; FEEDBACK; PERCEPTIONS; LEARNERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite the benefits of peer review, there are still challenges that need to be addressed to make it more effective for L2 students. With the development of technology, computer-mediated peer review has captured increasing attention from L2 writing researchers and instructors. While Turnitin is known for its use in detecting plagiarism, its newly developed module, PeerMark, aims to facilitate peer review. In this article, we share our experience of using Turnitin for peer review in an ESL academic writing course and discuss its advantages, its limitations, and how different features of PeerMark may be used to address some of the challenges identified in previous research on peer review in the L2 writing classroom. Throughout a semester, the students were required to complete three peer review tasks through Turnitin. Based on the instructor's experience and the students' reports, we found that Turnitin could help shift students' attention from local to global issues in writing, scaffold students in their effort to provide more helpful comments and to make connections between specific suggestions and holistic advice for writing, and facilitate classroom management during peer review.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 41
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The role of peer support in ESL students' accomplishment of oral academic tasks
    Kobayashi, M
    CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW-REVUE CANADIENNE DES LANGUES VIVANTES, 2003, 59 (03): : 337 - 368
  • [32] Peer-formativity: a framework for academic writing
    Murray, Rowena
    Thow, Morag
    HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 33 (06) : 1166 - 1179
  • [33] A Teacher's Perspectives on Peer Review in ESL Classes
    Vorobel, Oksana
    Vasquez, Camilla
    WRITING & PEDAGOGY, 2014, 6 (02): : 307 - 335
  • [34] What drives academic peer effects in middle school classrooms in China: Peer composition or peer performance?
    Chen, Qihui
    Pei, Chunchen
    Guo, Yuhe
    Zhai, Shengying
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [35] Causal discourse analyzer: improving automated feedback on academic ESL writing
    Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny
    Saricaoglu, Aysel
    COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2016, 29 (03) : 494 - 516
  • [36] Lexical bundles in academic writing among ESL Law students in Ghana
    Jones-Mensah, Ivy
    Tabiri, Michael Owusu
    Calys-Tagoe, Patience
    Ocloo, Joseph Kwame
    Amexo, Dickson
    PEGEM EGITIM VE OGRETIM DERGISI, 2025, 15 (02): : 17 - 29
  • [37] Student and teacher trial and perceptions of an online ESL academic writing unit
    Jun, Heesung Grace
    Lee, Hye-won
    LANGUAGES, CULTURES AND VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES, 2012, 34 : 128 - 131
  • [38] Mitigating Plagiarism in ESL Academic Writing: Evaluating the Efficacy of Educational Intervention
    Mahmud, Nazirah
    Tahir, Mohd Haniff Mohd
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2024, 10 (03): : 53 - 68
  • [39] CONCORDANCERS AND DICTIONARIES AS PROBLEM-SOLVING TOOLS FOR ESL ACADEMIC WRITING
    Yoon, Choongil
    LANGUAGE LEARNING & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 20 (01): : 209 - 229
  • [40] Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar.
    Cohen, A
    STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2005, 27 (01) : 109 - 110