Comparison of differences in medical costs when new oral anticoagulants are used for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism vs warfarin or placebo in the US

被引:27
|
作者
Amin, Alpesh [1 ]
Bruno, Amanda [2 ]
Trocio, Jeffrey [3 ]
Lin, Jay [4 ]
Lingohr-Smith, Melissa [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[2] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Plainsboro, NJ USA
[3] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
[4] Novosys Hlth, Green Brook, NJ USA
关键词
Economic model; Healthcare costs; New oral anticoagulants; Non-valvular atrial fibrillation; Venous thromboembolism;
D O I
10.3111/13696998.2015.1007210
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: Medical costs that may be avoided when any of the four new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, are used instead of warfarin for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were estimated and compared. Additionally, the overall differences in medical costs were estimated for NVAF and venous thromboembolism (VTE) patient populations combined. Methods: Medical cost differences associated with NOAC use vs warfarin or placebo among NVAF and VTE patients were estimated based on clinical event rates obtained from the published trial data. The clinical event rates were calculated as the percentage of patients with each of the clinical events during the trial periods. Univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses were conducted for the medical-cost differences determined for NVAF patients. A hypothetical health plan population of 1 million members was used to estimate and compare the combined medical-cost differences of the NVAF and VTE populations and were projected in the years 2015-2018. Results: In a year, the medical-cost differences associated with NOAC use instead of warfarin were estimated at -$204, -$140, -$495, and -$340 per patient for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. In 2014, among the hypothetical population, the medical-cost differences were -$3.7, -$4.2, -$11.5, and -$6.6 million for NVAF and acute VTE patients treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. In 2014, for the combined NVAF, acute VTE, and extended VTE patient populations, medical-cost differences were -$10.0, -$10.9, -$21.0, and -$21.0 million for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg apixaban, and 5mg apixaban, respectively. Medical-cost differences associated with use of NOACs were projected to steadily increase from 2014 to 2018. Conclusions: Medical costs are reduced when NOACs are used instead of warfarin/placebo for the treatment of NVAF or VTE, with apixaban being associated with the greatest reduction in medical costs.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 409
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] New oral anticoagulants, treatment of lower limbs deep venous thrombosis and non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a call to information!
    Laroche, Jean-Pierre
    Juliard, Jean-Michel
    Touze, Emmanuel
    Pernes, Jean-Marc
    Drouet, Ludovic
    SANG THROMBOSE VAISSEAUX, 2012, 24 (06): : 261 - 265
  • [22] Changing trends in the use of novel oral anticoagulants and warfarin for treating non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Birkinshaw, Alexander
    Fry, Christopher H.
    Fluck, David
    Sharma, Pankaj
    Han, Thang S.
    JRSM CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE, 2020, 9
  • [23] Use and compliance of treatment with direct oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Giner-Soriano, M.
    Gomez-Lumbreras, A.
    Cortes, J.
    Morros, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 75 : S27 - S27
  • [24] Comparative Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Morbidly Obese Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
    Barakat, Amr F.
    Jain, Sandeep
    Masri, Ahmad
    Senussi, Mourad
    Wang, Yisi
    Bhonsale, Aditya
    Saba, Samir
    Mulukutla, Suresh R.
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [25] CLINICAL AND DEMOGRAPHICS CHARACTERISTICS OF NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PATIENTS SWITCHING FROM WARFARIN TO NOVEL ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS
    Kachroo, S.
    Pan, X.
    Liu, L.
    Kawabata, H.
    Phatak, H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A500 - A501
  • [26] Association between direct-acting oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin with the risk of osteoporosis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Akhtar, Tauseef
    Hajra, Adrija
    Bhyan, Poonam
    Ghosh, Raktim K.
    Bandyopadhyay, Dhrubajyoti
    Aronow, Wilbert S.
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2020, 27
  • [27] New Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
    Hoecht, T.
    Frick, M.
    Alber, H.
    Huber, K.
    JOURNAL FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2012, 19 (3-4): : 55 - 62
  • [28] Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population
    Kiran Gupta
    Jeffrey Trocio
    Allison Keshishian
    Qisu Zhang
    Oluwaseyi Dina
    Jack Mardekian
    Anagha Nadkarni
    Thomas C Shank
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 19
  • [29] Characteristics of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation using dabigatran or warfarin in the US
    Schoof, Nils
    Schnee, Janet
    Schneider, Gary
    Gawlik, Melissa
    Zint, Kristina
    Clemens, Andreas
    Bartels, Dorothee B.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2014, 30 (05) : 795 - 804
  • [30] ORal anticoaGulants in diAbetic and Nondiabetic patients with nOn-valvular atrial fibrillatioN (ORGANON)
    Derosa, Giuseppe
    Rizzo, Manfredi
    Brunetti, Natale Daniele
    Raddino, Riccardo
    Gavazzoni, Mara
    Pasini, Gianfranco
    Gaudio, Giovanni
    Maggi, Antonio
    D'Angelo, Angela
    De Gennaro, Luisa
    Maffioli, Pamela
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2023, 37 (08)