Comparison the Quality of Classification Algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Skalska, Hana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hradec Kralove, Fac Informat & Management, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
关键词
Classification; Predictive Accuracy Measures; ROC; Cost Curve;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article summarises and describes different measures of the predictive quality (performance) of classification models. Quantitative measures of quality can be complemented with the visual representation. One of the best known is the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve that represents the performance of binary classification model within the full range of conditions (costs and class distributions) of discrimination. The duality between ROC and expected costs of a classifier (cost curve) is described in more details here. Cost curve measures the difference in performance of two classifiers directly in expected costs (EC). The use of ROC and EC is highly important when asymmetric misclassification costs, imbalanced probabilities of classes or changing conditions occur. A hybrid classifier can be found on the convex hull (ROCCH) of the ROC curves of different classifiers. This is potentially the best classification model for any mixture of outside constraints. Lower envelope of cost curves of different classifiers corresponds to ROCCH in ROC space.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 349
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of unsupervised dimension reduction algorithms for classification
    Choo, Jaegul
    Kim, Hyunsoo
    Park, Haesun
    Zha, Hongyuan
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 71 - 77
  • [22] A comparison between AI algorithms for weeds classification
    Tobal, Ahmed M.
    Hamid, Sahar Abdel
    Ibrahim, Nora Y.
    Abdelwahab, Ashraf H.
    COMPUTATIONAL ENGINEERING IN SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, 2008, : 224 - 229
  • [23] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification Problems
    Sekeroglu, Boran
    Hasan, Shakar Sherwan
    Abdullah, Saman Mirza
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTER VISION, VOL 2, 2020, 944 : 491 - 499
  • [24] A comparison of classification algorithms for hate speech detection
    Putri, T. T. A.
    Sriadhi, S.
    Sari, R. D.
    Rahmadani, R.
    Hutahaean, H. D.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION 2019 (ICIEVE 2019), PTS 1-4, 2020, 830
  • [25] Comparison of some HRR-classification algorithms
    Dicander, F
    Jonsson, R
    ALGORITHMS FOR SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY VIII, 2001, 4382 : 120 - 131
  • [26] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Somatotype Classification
    Katovic, Darko
    Cvjetko, Miljenko
    ICSPORTS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPORT SCIENCES RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT, 2019, : 217 - 223
  • [27] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Data classification
    ul Hassan, Ch Anwar
    Khan, Muhammad Sufyan
    Shah, Munam Ali
    2018 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION AND COMPUTING (ICAC' 18), 2018, : 270 - 275
  • [28] Comparison of Several Algorithms for Celestial object Classification
    Peng, Nanbo
    Zhang, Yanxia
    Zhao, Yongheng
    SOFTWARE AND CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FOR ASTRONOMY, 2010, 7740
  • [29] Classification Algorithms Comparison For Eeg Movement Recognition
    Dolezal, J.
    St'astny, J.
    Sovka, P.
    ANALYSIS OF BIOMEDICAL SIGNALS AND IMAGES, 2008, : 185 - 189
  • [30] Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Medical Diagnosis
    Jain, Anju
    Ratnoo, Saroj
    Kumar, Dinesh
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 26 (02): : 729 - 747