Comparison the Quality of Classification Algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Skalska, Hana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hradec Kralove, Fac Informat & Management, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
关键词
Classification; Predictive Accuracy Measures; ROC; Cost Curve;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article summarises and describes different measures of the predictive quality (performance) of classification models. Quantitative measures of quality can be complemented with the visual representation. One of the best known is the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve that represents the performance of binary classification model within the full range of conditions (costs and class distributions) of discrimination. The duality between ROC and expected costs of a classifier (cost curve) is described in more details here. Cost curve measures the difference in performance of two classifiers directly in expected costs (EC). The use of ROC and EC is highly important when asymmetric misclassification costs, imbalanced probabilities of classes or changing conditions occur. A hybrid classifier can be found on the convex hull (ROCCH) of the ROC curves of different classifiers. This is potentially the best classification model for any mixture of outside constraints. Lower envelope of cost curves of different classifiers corresponds to ROCCH in ROC space.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 349
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ASSESMENT THE QUALITY OF CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS
    Skalska, Hana
    APLIMAT 2005 - 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, PT II, 2005, : 529 - 535
  • [2] Two algorithms for classification on quality control
    Chang S.-C.
    Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 2010, 27 (01): : 15 - 21
  • [3] Comparison of Different Algorithms for Sentiment Classification
    Ciric, Milica
    Stanimirovic, Aleksandar
    Petrovic, Nikola
    Stoimenov, Leonid
    2013 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS IN MODERN SATELLITE, CABLE AND BROADCASTING SERVICES (TELSIKS), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2013, : 567 - 570
  • [4] Empirical Comparison of Graph Classification Algorithms
    Ketkar, Nikhil S.
    Holder, Lawrence B.
    Cook, Diane J.
    2009 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA MINING, 2009, : 259 - 266
  • [5] Comparison of Different Dichotomous Classification Algorithms
    Zhuravlev, Yu, I
    Ryazanov, V. Vl
    Ryazanov, Vl V.
    Aslanyan, L. H.
    Sahakyan, H. A.
    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2020, 30 (03) : 303 - 314
  • [6] Comparison of fuzzy clustering algorithms for classification
    Almeida, R. J.
    Sousa, J. M. C.
    2006 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EVOLVING FUZZY SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 112 - +
  • [7] CACP: Classification Algorithms Comparison Pipeline
    Czmil, Sylwester
    Kluska, Jacek
    Czmil, Anna
    SOFTWAREX, 2022, 19
  • [8] Comparison of Different Dichotomous Classification Algorithms
    Yu. I. Zhuravlev
    V. Vl. Ryazanov
    Vl. V. Ryazanov
    L. H. Aslanyan
    H. A. Sahakyan
    Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 2020, 30 : 303 - 314
  • [9] Quality of Algorithms for Sequence Comparison
    Roytberg, Mikhail
    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 6744 : 17 - 20
  • [10] Comparison of Classification Algorithms in Classification of ECG Beats by Time Series
    Kaya, Yasin
    Pehlivan, Huseyin
    2015 23RD SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2015, : 407 - 410