Laparoscopic completion gastrectomy in elderly patients with remnant gastric cancer: a case series

被引:7
|
作者
Kaihara, Masaki [1 ]
Matsuda, Satoru [1 ,2 ]
Booka, Eisuke [1 ]
Saida, Fumitaka [1 ]
Takashima, Jumpei [1 ]
Kasai, Hanako [1 ]
Mihara, Koki [1 ]
Nagashima, Atsushi [1 ,3 ]
Egawa, Tomohisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hosp, Dept Surg, Tsurumi Ku, 3-6-1 Shimosueyoshi, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2308765, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Shinjuku Ku, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Saiseikai Kanagawaken Hosp, Dept Surg, Kanagawa Ku, 6-6 Tomiya Chou, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2210821, Japan
关键词
Remnant gastric cancer; Laparoscopic completion gastrectomy; Elderly patients; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s40792-019-0610-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundOpen completion gastrectomy (OCG) has been selected to treat remnant gastric cancer (RGC) due to severe adhesions and difficulty recognizing anatomical orientation after primary gastrectomy. In general, elderly individuals' physiological reserves gradually decrease. Moreover, elderly patients (EPs) often have multiple complicating factors (i.e., frailty and comorbidities), leading to more postoperative complications after abdominal surgery. Recently, several trials revealed the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for EPs with gastric cancer in early recovery. However, there are limited studies investigating the use of laparoscopic completion gastrectomy (LCG) for RGC in EPs. This study aims to assess the efficacy of LCG in EPs aged 70years. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes of LCG with those of OCG.Case presentationTwenty-one EPs who underwent completion gastrectomy for RGC between 2007 and 2017 were enrolled and classified into two groups according to the surgical approach, namely the LCG (n = 6) and OCG (n = 15) groups. We adopted the G8 geriatric screening tool to comprehensively evaluate the EPs' physical, mental, and social functions. Patient characteristics, clinicopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, and survival were retrospectively reviewed and compared between groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the preoperative modified G8, indicating that the EPs' backgrounds between the groups were comparable. Of note, blood loss during surgery was significantly reduced in the LCG group [median (range); LCG, 50ml (20.0-65.0); OCG, 465ml (264.5-714.0); p = 0.002]. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes in the LCG and OCG groups were 7 (range 4-10) versus 3 (range 1-6), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospitalization, intake of solid food, and Clavien-Dindo grade II postoperative complications. In patients with a history of gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the LCG group, operative time tended to be longer in patients who underwent D2 lymph node dissection as primary surgery.ConclusionsLCG was comparable to OCG for the treatment of RGC in EPs with significantly reduced blood loss. While LCG should be selected with caution in patients who have undergone D2 lymph node dissection as primary surgery, it could be considered as a surgical procedure in EPs with RGC.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robotic gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: comparisons with robotic gastrectomy in younger patients and laparoscopic gastrectomy in the elderly
    Naoki Okumura
    Taeil Son
    Yoo Min Kim
    Hyoung-Il Kim
    Ji Yeong An
    Sung Hoon Noh
    Woo Jin Hyung
    Gastric Cancer, 2016, 19 : 1125 - 1134
  • [22] Laparoscopic Completion Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer Compared to Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy in Short- and Medium-Term Results
    Hammerschlag, Jonathan
    Hershkovitz, Yehuda
    Amos, Itai
    Lavy, Ron
    Ben-Yehuda, Amir
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (11): : 1047 - 1051
  • [23] Safety and curability of laparoscopic gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer
    Shimada, Shoji
    Sawada, Naruhiko
    Oae, Sonoko
    Seki, Junichi
    Takano, Yojiro
    Ishiyama, Yasuhiro
    Nakahara, Kenta
    Maeda, Chiyo
    Hidaka, Eiji
    Ishida, Fumio
    Kudo, Shin-ei
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (10): : 4277 - 4283
  • [24] Safety and curability of laparoscopic gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer
    Shoji Shimada
    Naruhiko Sawada
    Sonoko Oae
    Junichi Seki
    Yojiro Takano
    Yasuhiro Ishiyama
    Kenta Nakahara
    Chiyo Maeda
    Eiji Hidaka
    Fumio Ishida
    Shin-ei Kudo
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 4277 - 4283
  • [25] Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients
    Sheng, Shihou
    Chen, Yahong
    Li, Chunsheng
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 9 (23): : 4398 - 4403
  • [26] Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: feasibility study
    Nagai, Eishi
    Nakata, Kohei
    Ohuchida, Kenoki
    Miyasaka, Yoshihiro
    Shimizu, Shuji
    Tanaka, Masao
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (01): : 289 - 296
  • [27] Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: feasibility study
    Eishi Nagai
    Kohei Nakata
    Kenoki Ohuchida
    Yoshihiro Miyasaka
    Shuji Shimizu
    Masao Tanaka
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 289 - 296
  • [28] Is Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy a Feasible Procedure for Elderly Patients With Gastric Cancer?
    Kanaji, S.
    Kakeji, Y.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (06) : 546 - 547
  • [29] Effects of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy on elderly patients with gastric cancer
    Xu, Kai
    Xing, Jiadi
    Fan, Yingcong
    Cui, Ming
    Zhang, Chenghai
    Yang, Hong
    Yao, Zhendan
    Zhang, Nan
    Chen, Lei
    Liu, Maoxing
    Tan, Fei
    Gao, Pin
    Su, Xiangqian
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2021, 26 (02): : 490 - 498
  • [30] Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer Following Distal Gastrectomy with Radical Lymphadenectomy
    Yamamoto, Michihiro
    Zaima, Masazumi
    Yamamoto, Hidekazu
    Harada, Hideki
    Kawamura, Junichiro
    Yamaguchi, Tetsuya
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 62 (139) : 752 - 757