Feasibility of mitral valve surgery using minimal extracorporeal circulation

被引:6
|
作者
Sjatskig, J. [1 ]
Yilmaz, A. [1 ]
van Boven, J. W. [1 ]
Sonker, U. [1 ]
Waanders, F. G. [2 ]
Kloppenburg, G. T. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, NL-3430 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Clin Perfus, NL-3430 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
来源
PERFUSION-UK | 2012年 / 27卷 / 04期
关键词
minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC); mitral valve; coronary artery bypass grafting; MINIMIZED CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; REPLACEMENT; SYSTEM; BLOOD;
D O I
10.1177/0267659112442099
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: Using minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement has been proven to be safe, feasible and superior compared to standard cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in terms of postoperative complications, total hospital stay and blood product transfusions, This feasibility study evaluates the clinical outcomes of mitral valve surgery performed with MECC. Methods: From March 2006 to January 2011, seventy-five patients who underwent mitral valve surgery performed with MECC (n=75) in our institution were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic characteristics, operative data and clinical outcomes were collected in a prospectively designed database. Results: The mean age was 68.8 +/- 10.2 years with a EuroSCORE of 7.0 +/- 2.3. Thirty-seven patients had a moderate left ventricular function (with a range of 30-40%). All patients except two had severe mitral valve incompetence (MI). Surgery was successful in all procedures. The mean duration of surgery was 210 +/- 44 min (range 118-356 min). The mean CPB time was 128 +/- 30 (range 67-249) min. The cross-clamp time was 99 +/- 26 (range 48-205) min. There were no intraoperative perfusion problems or airlocks reported. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay was two days. Subsequent analysis showed a first postoperative haemoglobin value of 9.4 g/dL +/- 1.7. There were no peroperative neurological complications. One patient developed an ischaemic cerebrovascular accident (CVA) on the forth postoperative day due to inadequate anticoagulation. Other postoperative complications included eight patients with pneumonia, one superficial wound infection, temporary renal insufficiency in two patients and four patients needed re-exploration for excessive postoperative leakage. Overall in-hospital mortality was four percent. Conclusion: Our results show, for the first time, that isolated or combined mitral valve surgery using MECC is feasible and safe.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 268
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] OUTCOMES OF MITRAL VALVE SURGERY FOR MITRAL STENOSIS
    Al Mosa, A. F.
    Najm, H.
    Omair, A.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 131 : 351 - 351
  • [42] Mitral valve surgery for mitral annular calcification
    Wehbe, Mahmoud S.
    Poeling, Jochen
    Perier, Patrick
    Doll, Nicolas
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2023, : 61 - 68
  • [43] Systemic inflammation in cardiac surgery. Importance in the era of minimal extracorporeal circulation and off-pump surgery
    Schmidt, A. K.
    Assmann, A.
    Lichtenberg, A.
    Boeken, U.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2018, 32 (01): : 59 - 65
  • [44] Timing of mitral valve surgery
    Enriquez-Sarano, M
    HEART, 2002, 87 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [45] Robotic mitral valve surgery
    Cao, Christopher
    Harris, Christopher
    Croce, Beth
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 6 (01) : 73 - 73
  • [46] MITRAL-VALVE SURGERY
    ARIS, A
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 1984, 83 (01): : 21 - 23
  • [47] Surgery for Mitral Valve Endocarditis
    Gillinov, A. Marc
    Mihaljevic, Tomislav
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2009, 18 (03): : 323 - 324
  • [48] MITRAL-VALVE SURGERY
    COHN, PF
    CIRCULATION, 1981, 63 (04) : 965 - 968
  • [49] Status of mitral valve surgery
    Walkes, JCM
    Reardon, MJ
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 19 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [50] Robotic mitral valve surgery
    Kypson, AP
    Chitwood, WR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (4A): : 83S - 88S