Cost-effectiveness of the mobile application TCApp combined with face-to-face CBT treatment compared to face-to-face CBT treatment alone for patients with an eating disorder: study protocol of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

被引:11
|
作者
Anastasiadou, Dimitra [1 ,2 ]
Lupianez-Villanueva, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
Fauli, Clara [2 ]
Cunillera, Jordina Arcal [3 ]
Serrano-Troncoso, Eduardo [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Dept Informat & Commun Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Open Evidence Res Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[3] HealthApp, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Hosp St Joan de Deu Barcelona, Child & Adolescent Psychiat & Psychol Dept, Passeig St Joan de Deu 2, Esplugues 08950, Spain
[5] Inst Recerca St Joan de Deu, Children & Adolescent Mental Hlth Res Grp, Santa Rosa 39-57, Esplugas de Llobregat 08950, Spain
关键词
Eating disorders; mHealth; Treatment; Cost-effectiveness; BECK-DEPRESSION-INVENTORY; EXAMINATION-QUESTIONNAIRE; SMARTPHONE APPLICATION; ANOREXIA-NERVOSA; BULIMIA-NERVOSA; VALIDITY; INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; VALIDATION; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-018-1664-4
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: The clinical utility of the existing apps for people with eating disorders (EDs) is not clear. The TCApp has been specifically developed for people with EDs, is based on the principles of Cognitive Behavioural Treatment (CBT) and allows a bidirectional link between the patient and the therapist. The objectives of the study are, first, to assess the clinical efficacy of a combined intervention for Eating Disorders (EDs) that includes an online intervention through the TCApp plus standard face-to-face CBT in comparison to standard face-to-face CBT alone, and second, to examine the cost-effectiveness of the TCApp and identify potential predicting, moderating and mediating variables that promote or hinder the implementation of the TCApp in ED units in Spain. Methods: The study methodology is that of a randomised controlled trial combining qualitative and quantitative methods, with a 6-month follow-up. Approximately 250 patients over 12 years old with a diagnosis of an ED from several ED units in Spain will be randomised to one of two different conditions. Participants, their caregivers, healthcare professionals and technical staff involved in the development and maintenance of the application will be assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1) and at 6 months follow-up (T2). Primary outcome measures will include ED symptomatology while secondary measures will include general psychopathology and quality of life for patients, quality of life and caregiving experience for family caregivers and adoption-related variables for all participants involved, such as perceived usability, user's satisfaction and technology acceptance. For the cost-effectiveness analysis, we will assess quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); total societal cost will be estimated using costs to patients and the health plan, and other related costs. Discussion: The study will provide an important advance in the treatment of EDs; in the long term, it is expected to improve the quality of patient care and the treatment efficacy and to reduce waiting lists as well as direct and indirect costs associated with the treatment of EDs in Spain.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [41] MICE-Mental Health Intervention for Children with Epilepsy: a randomised controlled, multi-centre clinical trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of MATCH-ADTC in addition to usual care compared to usual care alone for children and young people with common mental health disorders and epilepsy-study protocol
    Bennett, Sophie D.
    Cross, J. Helen
    Coughtrey, Anna E.
    Heyman, Isobel
    Ford, Tamsin
    Chorpita, Bruce
    Moss-Morris, Rona
    Byford, Sarah
    Dalrymple, Emma
    Reilly, Colin
    Stephenson, Terence
    Dore, Caroline
    Varadkar, Sophia
    Blackstone, James
    Chowdhury, Kashfia
    Ganguli, Poushali
    Deane, Liz
    Shafran, Roz
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [42] Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) in treatment of patients with chronic depression—study protocol for a multi-site, cluster randomised controlled trial [TACK]
    Philip McNamee
    Aleksandra Matanov
    Lauren Jerome
    Sally Kerry
    Neil Walker
    Yan Feng
    Andrew Molodynski
    Shonagh Scott
    Latha Guruvaiah
    Sue Collinson
    Rose McCabe
    John Geddes
    Stefan Priebe
    Victoria Bird
    Trials, 23
  • [43] Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG plus ) in treatment of patients with chronic depression-study protocol for a multi-site, cluster randomised controlled trial [TACK]
    McNamee, Philip
    Matanov, Aleksandra
    Jerome, Lauren
    Kerry, Sally
    Walker, Neil
    Feng, Yan
    Molodynski, Andrew
    Scott, Shonagh
    Guruvaiah, Latha
    Collinson, Sue
    McCabe, Rose
    Geddes, John
    Priebe, Stefan
    Bird, Victoria
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [44] M.I.C.E—Mental Health Intervention for Children with Epilepsy: a randomised controlled, multi-centre clinical trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of MATCH-ADTC in addition to usual care compared to usual care alone for children and young people with common mental health disorders and epilepsy—study protocol
    Sophie D. Bennett
    J. Helen Cross
    Anna E. Coughtrey
    Isobel Heyman
    Tamsin Ford
    Bruce Chorpita
    Rona Moss-Morris
    Sarah Byford
    Emma Dalrymple
    Colin Reilly
    Terence Stephenson
    Caroline Doré
    Sophia Varadkar
    James Blackstone
    Kashfia Chowdhury
    Poushali Ganguli
    Liz Deane
    Roz Shafran
    Trials, 22
  • [45] United Kingdom Frozen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST), multi-centre, randomised, 12 month, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of Early Structured Physiotherapy versus manipulation under anaesthesia versus arthroscopic capsular release for patients referred to secondary care with a primary frozen shoulder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Stephen Brealey
    Alison L. Armstrong
    Andrew Brooksbank
    Andrew Jonathan Carr
    Charalambos P. Charalambous
    Cushla Cooper
    Belen Corbacho
    Joseph Dias
    Iona Donnelly
    Lorna Goodchild
    Catherine Hewitt
    Ada Keding
    Lucksy Kottam
    Sarah E. Lamb
    Catriona McDaid
    Matthew Northgraves
    Gerry Richardson
    Sara Rodgers
    Sarwat Shah
    Emma Sharp
    Sally Spencer
    David Torgerson
    Francine Toye
    Amar Rangan
    Trials, 18
  • [46] United Kingdom Frozen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST), multi-centre, randomised, 12 month, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of Early Structured Physiotherapy versus manipulation under anaesthesia versus arthroscopic capsular release for patients referred to secondary care with a primary frozen shoulder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Brealey, Stephen
    Armstrong, Alison L.
    Brooksbank, Andrew
    Carr, Andrew Jonathan
    Charalambous, Charalambos P.
    Cooper, Cushla
    Corbacho, Belen
    Dias, Joseph
    Donnelly, Iona
    Goodchild, Lorna
    Hewitt, Catherine
    Keding, Ada
    Kottam, Lucksy
    Lamb, Sarah E.
    McDaid, Catriona
    Northgraves, Matthew
    Richardson, Gerry
    Rodgers, Sara
    Shah, Sarwat
    Sharp, Emma
    Spencer, Sally
    Torgerson, David
    Toye, Francine
    Rangan, Amar
    TRIALS, 2017, 18