Comparison of non-Hertzian modeling approaches for wheel-rail rolling contact mechanics in the switch panel of a railway turnout

被引:15
|
作者
Ma, Xiaochuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ping [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Jingmang [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Rong [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Jiaotong Univ, Minist Educ, Engn Res Ctr Railway Environm Vibrat & Noise, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, MOE Key Lab High Speed Railway Engn, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Railway turnout; non-Hertzian; normal; tangential; relative motion of stock/switch rails; wheel-rail contact models; calculation times; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; FATIGUE; FORCES;
D O I
10.1177/0954409718799825
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Due to the complicated wheel-rail contact relation of railway turnouts, it is necessary to select a reasonable rolling contact model to simulate the vehicle-turnout dynamics and wheel-rail damages. This paper mainly aims to evaluate the calculation accuracy and efficiency of different non-Hertzian modeling approaches in solving normal and tangential wheel-rail contact problems of railway turnouts. Four different non-Hertzian approaches, namely CONTACT, Kik-Piotrowski, Ayasse-Chollet, and Sichani methods are compared and analyzed. The above four models are built considering the relative motion of stock/switch rails. A wheel profile called LMA contacting with stock/switch rails (head width 35 mm) of CN60-1100-1:18 turnouts is selected as the object of analysis. The normal contact problems are evaluated by the wheel-rail contact areas, shapes, and normal contact pressures. The assessment of tangential contact problems is based on the creep curves, tangential contact stresses, and distribution of the stick/slip region. In addition, a contrast analysis is performed on the calculation efficiencies of the four approaches. It is found that the normal and tangential contact results calculated based on the Sichani method coincide well with those obtained according to CONTACT, and the calculation efficiency is about 262 times that of CONTACT. The conclusions can provide some guidance to the selection of wheel-rail rolling contact approach in the simulation of vehicle-turnout dynamics and wheel-rail damages.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 476
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A fast method for determination of creep forces in non-Hertzian contact of wheel and rail based on a book of tables
    Jerzy Piotrowski
    Stefano Bruni
    Binbin Liu
    Egidio Di Gialleonardo
    Multibody System Dynamics, 2019, 45 : 169 - 184
  • [32] Modeling of high-speed wheel-rail rolling contact on a corrugated rail and corrugation development
    Zhao, Xin
    Wen, Ze-feng
    Wang, Heng-yu
    Jin, Xue-song
    Zhu, Min-hao
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2014, 15 (12): : 946 - 963
  • [33] Study on the transient wheel-rail rolling contact behaviour and key structural parameters of the fixed frog on tram turnout
    Xu, Jingmang
    Bai, Taoshuo
    Zhu, Hui
    Yang, Jian
    Wang, Kai
    He, Aonan
    Qian, Yao
    Wang, Ping
    Chen, Rong
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2025,
  • [34] Multibody modeling of railway vehicles: Innovative algorithms for the detection of wheel-rail contact points
    Falomi, Stefano
    Malvezzi, Monica
    Meli, Enrico
    WEAR, 2011, 271 (1-2) : 453 - 461
  • [35] Railway vehicle dynamics: Some aspects of wheel-rail contact modeling and optimization of running gears
    Kovalev, R
    Yazykov, VN
    Mikhalchenko, GS
    Pogorelov, DY
    MECHANICS BASED DESIGN OF STRUCTURES AND MACHINES, 2003, 31 (03) : 315 - 334
  • [36] Rail corrugation growth accounting for the flexibility and rotation of the wheel set and the non-Hertzian and non-steady-state effects at contact patch
    Vila, Paloma
    Baeza, Luis
    Martinez-Casas, Jose
    Carballeira, Javier
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2014, 52 : 92 - 108
  • [37] Random analysis of dynamic wheel-rail interactions in the switch panel of a turnout with geometric tolerances based on the probability density evolution method
    Yan, Zheng
    Li, Shuxiao
    Xu, Jingmang
    Yang, Huaizhi
    Liu, Ji
    Chen, Jiayin
    Wang, Ping
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2023, 61 (10) : 2638 - 2663
  • [38] Reply to comments on "The Kalker book of tables for non-Hertzian contact of wheel and rail' by E. A. H. Vollebregt
    Piotrowski, Jerzy
    Bruni, Stefano
    Liu, Binbin
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2018, 56 (09) : 1460 - 1469
  • [39] Comparison of wheel-rail contact codes for railway vehicle simulation: an introduction to the Manchester Contact Benchmark and initial results
    Shackleton, P.
    Iwnicki, S.
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2008, 46 (1-2) : 129 - 149
  • [40] Non-Hertzian contact analysis of heavy-haul locomotive wheel/rail dynamic interactions under changeable friction conditions
    Yang, Yunfan
    Guo, Xinru
    Sun, Yu
    Ling, Liang
    Zhang, Tao
    Wang, Kaiyun
    Zhai, Wanming
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2022, 60 (06) : 2167 - 2189