Evaluating national practice of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer based on clinical auditing

被引:24
|
作者
van Leersum, N. J. [1 ]
Snijders, H. S. [1 ]
Wouters, M. W. J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Henneman, D. [1 ]
Marijnen, C. A. M. [3 ]
Rutten, H. R. [4 ,6 ]
Tollenaar, R. A. E. M. [1 ]
Tanis, P. J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
EJSO | 2013年 / 39卷 / 09期
关键词
Clinical audit; Colorectal neoplasms; Colorectal surgery; Radiotherapy; Guideline adherence; Benchmarking; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DELAYED SURGERY; RECURRENCE; MULTICENTER; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; CONSENSUS; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2013.06.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Internationally, the use of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer varies largely, related to different decision-making based on the harm-benefit ratio. In the Dutch guideline, RT is indicated in all cT2-4 tumours. We aimed to evaluate the use of RT in the Netherlands and to discuss Dutch practice in the context of current literature. Methods: Data of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) were used and 6784 patients surgically treated for primary rectal cancer in 2009-2011 were included. The application and type of RT were described according to age, comorbidity, tumour localization and tumour stage at population level with analysis of hospital variation for specific subsets. Results: In total, 85% of-patients who underwent resection for rectal cancer received RT. Comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2+) and older age (>= 70 years) were associated with a slight decrease in application of RT (75 and 80% respectively). In stage I tumours, 77% of patients received RT, but large hospital variation existed (0-100%). The proportion chemoradiotherapy of the whole group of RT increased with increasing N-stage, increasing T-stage, decreasing distance from the anus, younger age and less comorbidity with hospital variation from 0 to 73%. Conclusion: From a European perspective, a high percentage of rectal cancer patients are treated with RT in the Netherlands. Considerable hospital variation was observed for RT in stage I and the proportion of chemoradiotherapy among all RT schemes. Data from clinical auditing enable evaluation of national practice and current standards from both a scientific and international perspective. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1000 / 1006
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The paradox of preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (02): : 127 - 128
  • [22] Preoperative radiotherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer
    Lorchel, Fabrice
    Peignaux, Karine
    Crehange, Gilles
    Bosset, Mathieu
    Puyraveau, Marc
    Mercier, Mariette
    Bosset, Jean-Francois
    Maingon, Philippe
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2007, 31 (04): : 436 - 441
  • [23] The use of preoperative radiotherapy in the management of patients with clinically resectable rectal cancer: a practice guideline
    Figueredo, Alvaro
    Zuraw, Lisa
    Wong, Rebecca K. S.
    Agboola, Olusegun
    Rumble, R. Bryan
    Tandan, Ved
    BMC MEDICINE, 2003, 1 (1)
  • [24] The use of preoperative radiotherapy in the management of patients with clinically resectable rectal cancer: a practice guideline
    Alvaro Figueredo
    Lisa Zuraw
    Rebecca KS Wong
    Olusegun Agboola
    R Bryan Rumble
    Ved Tandan
    BMC Medicine, 1
  • [26] Changes in nationwide use of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer after revision of the national colorectal cancer guideline
    Gietelink, L.
    Wouters, M. W. J. M.
    Marijnen, C. A. M.
    van Groningen, J.
    van Leersum, N.
    Beets-Tan, R. G. H.
    Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.
    Tanis, P. J.
    EJSO, 2017, 43 (07): : 1297 - 1303
  • [27] PINCH is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients without preoperative radiotherapy: A study in a Swedish rectal cancer trial of preoperative radiotherapy
    Holmqvist, Annica Elisabet
    Holmlund, Birgitta
    Ardsby, Malin
    Gao, Jingfang
    Adell, Gunnar
    Johansson, Ann-Charlotte
    Carstensen, John
    Langford, Dianne
    Sun, Xiao-Feng
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [28] PINCH is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients without preoperative radiotherapy - a study in a Swedish rectal cancer trial of preoperative radiotherapy
    Annica Holmqvist
    Jingfang Gao
    Birgitta Holmlund
    Gunnar Adell
    John Carstensen
    Dianne Langford
    Xiao-Feng Sun
    BMC Cancer, 12
  • [29] PINCH is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients without preoperative radiotherapy - a study in a Swedish rectal cancer trial of preoperative radiotherapy
    Holmqvist, Annica
    Gao, Jingfang
    Holmlund, Birgitta
    Adell, Gunnar
    Carstensen, John
    Langford, Dianne
    Sun, Xiao-Feng
    BMC CANCER, 2012, 12
  • [30] Preoperative staging of rectal cancer allows selection of patients for preoperative radiotherapy
    Loftus, IM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (12) : 1733 - 1733