Treatment of Pain in European Nursing Homes: Results from the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm Care (SHELTER) Study

被引:54
|
作者
Lukas, Albert [1 ]
Mayer, Benjamin [2 ]
Fialova, Daniela [3 ,4 ]
Topinkova, Eva [3 ]
Gindin, Jacob [5 ]
Onder, Graziano [6 ]
Bernabei, Roberto [6 ]
Nikolaus, Thorsten [1 ]
Denkinger, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Agaples Bethesda Clin, Competence Ctr Geriatr & Aging Res, D-89073 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Inst Epidemiol & Med Biometry, D-89073 Ulm, Germany
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Geriatr, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Pharm Hradec Kralove, Dept Social & Clin Pharm, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Univ Haifa, CSHD, IL-31999 Haifa, Israel
[6] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Ctr Med Invecchiamento, Rome, Italy
关键词
Pain; therapy; pharmacological and nonpharmacological; treatment; analgesic; physical therapy; occupational therapy; European; nursing home residents; long term care facilities; PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT; STAFFING STANDARDS; COGNITIVELY INTACT; OLDER PERSONS; RATING-SCALE; CANCER PAIN; RESIDENTS; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; DEMENTIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2013.04.009
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management approaches and associated factors in nursing home residents across Europe. Setting, Participants, and Measurements: Cross-sectional study with 4156 residents who were assessed using the interRAI instrument for Long Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF), including pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management modalities. Those reporting pain were included in the analyses (n = 1900). A deeper analysis was performed for the subsample of residents who reported "current pain," defined as pain at least 1 day within the past 3 days (n = 838), and those who reported "current pain of moderate to severe intensity" (n = 590). Results: Up to 24% of residents who reported pain did not receive any pain medication and up to 11% received it only PRN (as-needed basis), independent of current pain-intensity levels; 61% did not receive any nonpharmacological treatment and 21% received neither pharmacological nor nonpharmacological pain modalities. Considerable differences could be demonstrated across European countries. Factors positively associated with pharmacological pain management were being of female gender, reporting cancer, and having moderate or severe pain. High turnover rates of regular staff and low-to-moderate physicians' availability were negatively associated. Factors positively associated with nonpharmacological treatment were fractures and need of assistance in activities of daily living. Dementia, large nursing home facilities, above-average and high turnover rates of nursing staff, a low physicians' availability, and severe pain intensity were negatively associated. Conclusion: Despite some advances in recent years, pain treatment in European nursing home residents remains to be suboptimal and requires further improvement. Copyright (C) 2013 - American Medical Directors Association, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 831
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health determinants and survival in nursing home residents in Europe: Results from the SHELTER study
    Vetrano, Davide L.
    Collamati, Agnese
    Magnavita, Nicola
    Sowa, Agnieszka
    Topinkova, Eva
    Finne-Soveri, Harriet
    van der Roest, Henriette G.
    Tobiasz-Adamczyk, Beata
    Giovannini, Silvia
    Ricciardi, Walter
    Bernabei, Roberto
    Onder, Graziano
    Poscia, Andrea
    MATURITAS, 2018, 107 : 19 - 25
  • [32] Are older long term care residents accurately prognosticated and consequently informed about their prognosis? Results from SHELTER study data in 5 European countries
    ten Koppel, Maud
    Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
    Pasman, H. Roeline
    Bernabei, Roberto
    Carpenter, Iain
    Denkinger, Michael D.
    Onder, Graziano
    van der Roest, Henriette G.
    Topinkova, Eva
    van Hout, Hein P. J.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [33] Long-term care during the Corona pandemic - Main results from a nationwide online survey in nursing homes in Germany
    Rothgang, Heinz
    Domhoff, Dominik
    Friedrich, Anna-Carina
    Heinze, Franziska
    Preuss, Benedikt
    Schmidt, Annika
    Seibert, Kathrin
    Stolle, Claudia
    Wolf-Ostermann, Karin
    PFLEGE, 2020, 33 (05): : 265 - 275
  • [34] PROVIDING LONG-TERM-CARE FOR PERSONS WITH AIDS - RESULTS FROM A SURVEY OF NURSING-HOMES IN THE UNITED-STATES
    GENTRY, D
    FOGARTY, TE
    LEHRMAN, S
    AIDS PATIENT CARE, 1994, 8 (03): : 130 - 137
  • [35] A complex health services intervention to improve medical care in long-term care homes: study protocol of the controlled coordinated medical care (CoCare) study
    Boris A. Brühmann
    Christina Reese
    Klaus Kaier
    Margrit Ott
    Christoph Maurer
    Simone Kunert
    Bruno R. Saurer
    Erik Farin
    BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [36] Oral treatment need and oral treatment intention in a population enrolled in long-term care in nursing homes and home care
    Isaksson, R
    Söderfeldt, B
    Nederfors, T
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 61 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [37] Comparison of Long-term Care in Nursing Homes Versus Home Health: Costs and Outcomes in Alabama
    Blackburn, Justin
    Locher, Julie L.
    Kilgore, Meredith L.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2016, 56 (02): : 215 - 221
  • [38] TRENDS IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION IN ELDERLY LONG TERM CARE NURSING HOME RESIDENTS
    Gaboda, D.
    Lucas, J. A.
    Siegel, M. J.
    Kalay, E.
    Crystal, S.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2009, 49 : 52 - 52
  • [39] A complex health services intervention to improve medical care in long-term care homes: study protocol of the controlled coordinated medical care (CoCare) study
    Bruehmann, Boris A.
    Reese, Christina
    Kale, Klaus
    Ott, Margrit
    Maurer, Christoph
    Kunert, Simone
    Saurer, Bruno R.
    Farin, Erik
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [40] ADMINISTRATIVE CONFLICTS MODEL FOR LONG TERM CARE FACILITY: CASE STUDY ON JAPANESE NURSING HOMES
    Katagiri, S.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2016, 56 : 83 - 83