Thinning increases climatic resilience of red pine

被引:71
|
作者
Magruder, Matthew [1 ]
Chhin, Sophan [1 ]
Palik, Brian [2 ]
Bradford, John B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Forestry, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, USDA, No Res Stn, Grand Rapids, MN 55744 USA
[3] No Arizona Univ, US Geol Survey, Southwest Biol Sci Ctr, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
关键词
GROWTH RELATIONSHIPS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GREAT-LAKES; DROUGHT; SENSITIVITY; MINNESOTA; RESPONSES; MICHIGAN; DENSITY; CONIFER;
D O I
10.1139/cjfr-2013-0088
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Forest management techniques such as intermediate stand-tending practices (e. g., thinning) can promote climatic resiliency in forest stands by moderating tree competition. Residual trees gain increased access to environmental resources (i.e., soil moisture, light), which in turn has the potential to buffer trees from stressful climatic conditions. The influences of climate (temperature and precipitation) and forest management (thinning method and intensity) on the productivity of red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) in Michigan were examined to assess whether repeated thinning treatments were able to increase climatic resiliency (i.e., maintaining productivity and reduced sensitivity to climatic stress). The cumulative productivity of each thinning treatment was determined, and it was found that thinning from below to a residual basal area of 14 m(2).ha(-1) produced the largest average tree size but also the second lowest overall biomass per acre. On the other hand, the uncut control and the thinning from above to a residual basal area of 28 m(2).ha(-1) produced the smallest average tree size but also the greatest overall biomass per acre. Dendrochronological methods were used to quantify sensitivity of annual radial growth to monthly and seasonal climatic factors for each thinning treatment type. Climatic sensitivity was influenced by thinning method (i.e., thinning from below decreased sensitivity to climatic stress more than thinning from above) and by thinning intensity (i.e., more intense thinning led to a lower climatic sensitivity). Overall, thinning from below to a residual basal area of 21 m(2).ha(-1) represented a potentially beneficial compromise to maximize tree size, biomass per acre, and reduced sensitivity to climatic stress, and, thus, the highest level of climatic resilience.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 889
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 'Red pine'
    Phillips, R
    HUDSON REVIEW, 2004, 57 (03): : 462 - 462
  • [42] Thinning increases cone production of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) stands in the Northern Plateau (Spain)
    Daniel Moreno-Fernández
    Isabel Cañellas
    Rafael Calama
    Javier Gordo
    Mariola Sánchez-González
    Annals of Forest Science, 2013, 70 : 761 - 768
  • [43] Thinning increases cone production of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) stands in the Northern Plateau (Spain)
    Moreno-Fernandez, Daniel
    Canellas, Isabel
    Calama, Rafael
    Gordo, Javier
    Sanchez-Gonzalez, Mariola
    ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2013, 70 (08) : 761 - 768
  • [44] Thinning models and yield in Lodgepole pine and Scots pine stands in Sweden
    Elfving, B
    STAND DENSITY MANAGEMENT: PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 12 - 17
  • [45] Thinning effects on litterfall remaining after 8 years and improved stand resilience in Aleppo pine afforestation (SE Spain)
    Jimenez, M. N.
    Navarro, F. B.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 169 : 174 - 183
  • [46] Less climatic resilience in the Arctic
    Overland, James E.
    WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES, 2020, 30
  • [47] The Climatic Resilience of the Sasanian Empire
    Jacobson, Matthew J.
    Gascoigne, Alison L.
    Fleitmann, Dominik
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2024, 52 (06) : 1127 - 1143
  • [48] AUSTRIAN PINE - NO SUBSTITUTE FOR RED PINE
    MORROW, RR
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1975, 73 (10) : 656 - 656
  • [49] Modeling response to thinning in loblolly pine plantations
    1600, Soc of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD, USA (24):
  • [50] Comparative analysis of thinning techniques in pine forests
    Olga Grigoreva
    Elena Runova
    Vera Savchenkova
    Edward Hertz
    Anna Voronova
    Viktor Ivanov
    Viktoria Shvetsova
    Igor Grigorev
    Mikhail Lavrov
    Journal of Forestry Research, 2022, 33 : 1145 - 1156