Active surveillance of localized prostate cancer.: Significance of prostate core needle biopsies

被引:0
|
作者
Rueschoff, J. [1 ]
Middel, P. [1 ]
Albers, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Pathol Nordhessen, D-34131 Kassel, Germany
[2] Klinikum Kassel GmbH, Urol Klin, Kassel, Germany
来源
PATHOLOGE | 2008年 / 29卷 / 05期
关键词
insignificant prostate cancer; active surveillance; Gleason score; core needle biopsy; improved pre-embedding;
D O I
10.1007/s00292-008-1013-3
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Today, more than 80% of men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCA) by PSA screening do not die from the sequelae of their disease. About 70% present with early, organ-confined cancer and almost half of them are small (< 5 cm(3)) without evidence of progression over years (insignificant PCA). It is assumed that screening brings the diagnosis of PCA forward by about 9 years and that in almost one third of these cases immediate radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy would result in overtreatment. Thus, the treatment strategy of "active surveillance" with selective but delayed intervention for patients with organ-confined PCA could be an attractive alternative to the known curative therapy options. However, a prerequisite of such a therapeutic approach would be a precise identification of patients at high risk for cancer progression. Careful work-up of prostate core needle biopsies including improved pre-embedding preparation and detailed interpretation are of the utmost importance. A Gleason score <= 6 and tumor in only one or two cores are considered predictive of organ-confined cancer. Pathologists should concentrate on correct Gleason scoring in core needle biopsies and identification of lesions that exclude a patient from active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 347
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Early outcomes of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Hardie, C
    Parker, C
    Norman, A
    Eeles, R
    Horwich, A
    Huddart, R
    Dearnaley, D
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (07) : 956 - 960
  • [22] Economic analysis of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Kim, Sun I. I.
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    Evans, Christopher P.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2012, 22 (03) : 247 - 253
  • [23] Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer
    Hogden, Anne
    Churruca, Kate
    Rapport, Frances
    Gillatt, David
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2019, 22 (05) : 1028 - 1039
  • [24] Focal neuroendocrine differentiation lacks prognostic significance in prostate core needle biopsies
    Casella, R
    Bubendorf, L
    Sauter, G
    Moch, H
    Mihatsch, MJ
    Gasser, TC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (02): : 406 - 410
  • [25] The need of avoiding unnecessary biopsies in active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Taratkin, M.
    Alvarez-Maestro, M.
    Gomez Rivas, J.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2021, 45 (06): : 417 - 418
  • [26] Transperineal sector biopsies: Their role in prostate cancer active surveillance
    Vyas, Lona
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (05)
  • [27] IMPACT OF SERIAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES ON SEXUAL FUNCTION IN MEN ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Glass, Allison S.
    Hilton, Joan F.
    Blaschko, Sarah D.
    Whitson, Jared M.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Washington, Samuel L.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E587 - E587
  • [28] Effect of Repeated Prostate Biopsies on Erectile Function in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Braun, Katharina
    Ahallal, Youness
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Ghoneim, Tarek
    Esteban, Mario Dominguez
    Mulhall, John
    Vickers, Andrew
    Eastham, James
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Touijer, Karim A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (03): : 744 - 749
  • [29] Validation of an active surveillance threshold for the CCP score in conservatively managed men with localized prostate cancer.
    Cuzick, Jack M.
    Stone, Steven
    Fisher, Gabrielle
    North, Bernard
    Berney, Daniel M.
    Beltran, Luis
    Greenberg, David
    Moller, Henrik
    Reid, Julia E.
    Gutin, Alexander
    Lanchbury, Jerry S.
    Brawer, Michael K.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [30] Validation of an active surveillance threshold for the CCP score in conservatively managed men with localized prostate cancer.
    Stone, Steven
    Cuzick, Jack M.
    Fisher, Gabrielle
    Yang, Zi Hua
    North, Bernard
    Berney, Daniel M.
    Beltran, Luis
    Greenberg, David
    Moller, Henrik
    Reid, Julia E.
    Gutin, Alexander
    Lanchbury, Jerry S.
    Brawer, Michael K.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (07)