Indicators for self-organization potential in urban context

被引:16
|
作者
Partanen, Jenni [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Technol, Sch Architecture Urban Planning & Design, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
来源
关键词
self-organization; complexity; urban evolution; innovation; planning; CELLULAR-AUTOMATA MODEL; DYNAMIC-MODEL; METHODOLOGY; COMPLEXITY; EMERGENCE; SYSTEMS; CHAOS;
D O I
10.1068/b140064p
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Self-organization is a basic mechanism by which complex urban systems organize themselves. This mechanism emerges from individual agents' local interactions, often with unpredictable consequences at the regional level. These emergent patterns cannot be controlled by traditional hierarchical methods, but they can be steered and encouraged towards desirable goals. Self-organization is often used as an allegory for all unplanned' activity in cities. It is important to study the actual mechanisms of self-organization in cities to link the theory of self-organization to planning praxis. This work builds on ongoing work exploring novel complex planning tools and methods. Here I explore the key features of open dynamic systems identified in the literature as indicators of self-organizing capacity. I study their applicability in urban spatial planning, and propose three measurable characteristics for estimating the self-organization potential of urban activities. Flow reflects generic accessibility, and is measured using space syntax. Internal order refers to autonomously organizing entities, in this case the clustering tendencies of activities. Enriching rests upon increasing complexity and is measured as changes in degrees of entropy over time. The results indicate that (1) the study area meets the criteria for self-organization, and (2) these characteristics can be applied to discover nodes of higher potential for self-organization in a city.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 971
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Self-organization in Brains
    Cariani, Peter
    CONSTRUCTIVIST FOUNDATIONS, 2013, 9 (01): : 35 - 38
  • [42] Self-organization in SOIFET
    Dobrovolsky, VN
    Ishchuk, LV
    Ninidze, GK
    Pavljuk, SP
    Plichko, YO
    MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2004, 72 (1-4) : 383 - 387
  • [43] The self-organization of cyberprotest
    Fuchs, C.
    Internet Society II: Advances in Education, Commerce & Governance, 2006, 36 : 275 - 295
  • [44] Evolution and self-organization
    Weise, P
    JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 1996, 152 (04): : 716 - 722
  • [45] INSTITUTIONAL SELF-ORGANIZATION
    MARNEY, M
    POLICY SCIENCES, 1971, 2 (02) : 117 - 142
  • [46] Stochastic Self-organization
    Barfoot, Timothy D.
    D'Eleuterio, Gabriele M. T.
    COMPLEX SYSTEMS, 2005, 16 (02): : 95 - 121
  • [47] Self-organization with memory
    Tarasov, Vasily E.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2019, 72 : 240 - 271
  • [48] Self-organization of proteins
    Rapis, EG
    PISMA V ZHURNAL TEKHNICHESKOI FIZIKI, 1995, 21 (09): : 13 - 20
  • [49] Self-Organization and Society
    Akahori, Saburo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF JAPANESE SOCIOLOGY, 2009, 18 (01) : 130 - 132
  • [50] Characterization of self-organization
    De Meer, H
    Koppen, C
    PEER-TO-PEER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 3485 : 227 - 246