Construct validity of the structure of general interests questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Dzuka, J [1 ]
机构
[1] FF PU, Katedra Psychol, Presov 08087, Slovakia
来源
CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE | 1999年 / 43卷 / 02期
关键词
profession interests; Holland's hexagonal model of interests; construct validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The construct validity of the Slovak version of the structure of general interests questionnaire (Bergmann and Eder, 1992) was tested in the sample of 108 pupils. The Holland's theoretical postulate (1973) concerning the hexagonal asserting of interests that represents the theoretical starting point of the tested questionnaire was confirmed by means of correlation analysis. The exception is discussed when the positive correlation between the near-by interests postulated by the model was not confirmed. The correlation of questionnaire scales with the instrument measuring the different construct is low according the expectancy, and the tested differences between genders were in accord with the findings of authors of the original instrument. The six factors structure of the instrument couldn't be convincingly confirmed by the factor analysis and first the repeated rotations with elimination of a number of items enabled author to find the acceptable solution. Whereas the results of factor analysis suppose the elimination or modification of a number of items, the correlations of items with scales are satisfactory convincing and support the opinion that the structure of general interests questionnaire can be considered as the valid instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE MOTIVATED STRATEGIES FOR LEARNING QUESTIONNAIRE
    Hamilton, Richard J.
    Akhter, Selina
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2009, 104 (03) : 711 - 722
  • [22] RELIABILITY, VALIDITY AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE IN A CHINESE CONTEXT
    CHAN, DW
    CHAN, TSC
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1983, 13 (02) : 363 - 371
  • [23] The Norwegian EUROPEP questionnaire for patient evaluation of general practice: data quality, reliability and construct validity
    Bjertnaes, Oyvind A.
    Lyngstad, Inger
    Malterud, Kirsti
    Garratt, Andrew
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2011, 28 (03) : 342 - 349
  • [24] A structure of the strategies of coping in adolescence (on the problem of construct validity of the questionnaire ⟪Adolescent Coping Scale⟫)
    Kholodnaya, M. A.
    Berestneva, O. G.
    Muratova, E. A.
    VOPROSY PSIKHOLOGII, 2007, (04) : 143 - +
  • [25] Factor structure, internal consistency, and construct validity of the Caregiver strain questionnaire in Latinx families
    Rodriguez, Melanie M. Domenech
    Vazquez, Alejandro L.
    Galvan, Thania
    Gudino, Omar G.
    FAMILY PROCESS, 2024, 63 (02) : 1084 - 1098
  • [26] Construct validity of the McGill Pain Questionnaire: Exploratory and confirmatory examinations of the tripartite factor structure
    Jang, DM.
    Boyle, GJ.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 58 : 149 - 150
  • [27] CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE MULTIMETHOD OBJECTIVE INTERESTS TEST BATTERY (MOI)
    Hudakova, Miriama
    Sollar, Tomas
    PHD EXISTENCE 2018: CZECH & SLOVAK PSYCHOLOGICAL CONFERENCE (NOT ONLY) FOR POSTGRADUATES AND ABOUT POSTGRADUATES: INFINITY IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, : 110 - 122
  • [28] CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF A NEW MIGRAINE SATISFACTION WITH TREATMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
    Ruiz, M. A.
    Moya, M. C.
    Soto, J.
    Rejas, J.
    Gago-Veiga, A.
    Gonzalez-Garcia, N.
    de Teran, Diaz J.
    Heredia-Rodriguez, P.
    Camina, J.
    Garcia-Azorin, D.
    Gine-Cipres, E.
    Gonzalez-Quintanilla, V
    Torres-Ferrus, M.
    Armada, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S450 - S450
  • [29] An Evaluation of the Construct Validity of the Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire
    Lord, Kayla A.
    Liverant, Gabrielle, I
    Stewart, Jeremy G.
    Hayes-Skelton, Sarah A.
    Suvak, Michael K.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, : 1062 - 1073
  • [30] Factorial construct validity of the extended attributional style questionnaire
    Joiner, TE
    Metalsky, GI
    COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1999, 23 (01) : 105 - 114