Construct validity of the structure of general interests questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Dzuka, J [1 ]
机构
[1] FF PU, Katedra Psychol, Presov 08087, Slovakia
来源
CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE | 1999年 / 43卷 / 02期
关键词
profession interests; Holland's hexagonal model of interests; construct validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The construct validity of the Slovak version of the structure of general interests questionnaire (Bergmann and Eder, 1992) was tested in the sample of 108 pupils. The Holland's theoretical postulate (1973) concerning the hexagonal asserting of interests that represents the theoretical starting point of the tested questionnaire was confirmed by means of correlation analysis. The exception is discussed when the positive correlation between the near-by interests postulated by the model was not confirmed. The correlation of questionnaire scales with the instrument measuring the different construct is low according the expectancy, and the tested differences between genders were in accord with the findings of authors of the original instrument. The six factors structure of the instrument couldn't be convincingly confirmed by the factor analysis and first the repeated rotations with elimination of a number of items enabled author to find the acceptable solution. Whereas the results of factor analysis suppose the elimination or modification of a number of items, the correlations of items with scales are satisfactory convincing and support the opinion that the structure of general interests questionnaire can be considered as the valid instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LATENT STRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE REINFORCEMENT SENSITIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE
    Mitrovic, Dusanka
    Smederevac, Snezana
    Colovic, Petar
    PSIHOLOGIJA, 2008, 41 (04) : 555 - 575
  • [2] Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
    Goodman, Zachary T.
    Timpano, Kiara R.
    Llabre, Maria M.
    Bainter, Sierra A.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 34 (07) : 671 - 683
  • [3] Questionnaire of profession intentions - factor structure, reliability and construct validity
    Dzuka, J.
    CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE, 2006, 50 (05): : 446 - 457
  • [4] CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE GENERAL INTEREST STRUCTURE TEST (AISTR)
    Hudakova, Miriama
    Sollar, Tomas
    PHD EXISTENCE 2017: CESKO-SLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGICKA KONFERENCE (NEJEN) PRO DOKTORANDY A O DOKTORANDECH, 2017, : 93 - 101
  • [5] The Validity of the Group Questionnaire: Construct Clarity or Construct Drift?
    Thayer, Stephen D.
    Burlingame, Gary M.
    GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 18 (04) : 318 - 332
  • [6] General Health Questionnaire (GHQ12): new evidence of construct validity
    Oliveira, Tulio Augusto Andrade
    Gouveia, Valdiney Veloso
    Ribeiro, Maria Gabriela Costa
    Oliveira, Karen Guedes
    Melo, Romulo Lustosa Pimenteira de
    Montagna, Erik
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2023, 28 (03): : 803 - 810
  • [7] Construct validity of writing motivation Questionnaire
    Roy, Devdulal Dutta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (02): : 6 - 11
  • [8] Concurrent and construct validity of the outcome questionnaire
    Umphress, VJ
    Lambert, MJ
    Smart, DW
    Barlow, SH
    Clouse, G
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 1997, 15 (01) : 40 - 55
  • [9] Construct Validity of the Social Coping Questionnaire
    Swiatek, Mary Ann
    Cross, Tracy L.
    JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED, 2007, 30 (04) : 427 - 449
  • [10] Construct validity of the risk, pain, and injury questionnaire
    Walk, SR
    Wiersma, LD
    SOCIOLOGY OF SPORT JOURNAL, 2005, 22 (04) : 433 - 446