Adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab are equally effective treatments for patients with psoriatic arthritis

被引:18
|
作者
Gladman, Dafna D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Western Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Psoriat Arthritis Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
anti-TNF agents; efficacy; psoriatic arthritis; randomized controlled trials; safety;
D O I
10.1038/ncprheum0880
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In a recent meta-analysis of the risks and benefits of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapies in patients with psoriatic arthritis, Saad et al. found that adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab were all significantly more effective than placebo for all outcome measures analyzed. There were no differences between these anti-TNF inhibitors in achieving the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) response for joint disease. A difference in the efficacy of the anti-TNF agents for treatment of skin manifestations was reported; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Analysis of other disease manifestations would have been interesting, as there is a clinical perception of a better response to treatment with anti-TNF antibodies (i.e. adalimumab and infliximab) versus the TNF receptor (i.e. etanercept). When comparing the anti-TNF agents with placebo in terms of safety, the only significant difference was an increased incidence of injection-site reactions associated with etanercept therapy. As all three drugs were shown to be equally effective in the management of psoriatic arthritis, patients should be allowed to make treatment choices based on whether they prefer the flexibility of self injection or whether they find repeated injections unacceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 511
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Etanercept and Adalimumab Treatment Patterns in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Enrolled in a Commercial Health Plan
    Chastek, Benjamin
    Fox, Kathleen M.
    Watson, Crystal
    Gandra, Shravanthi R.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2012, 29 (08) : 691 - 697
  • [32] COST PER RESPONDER OF APREMILAST VERSUS ETANERCEPT AND ADALIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS
    Tencer, T.
    Clancy, Z.
    Zhang, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A376 - A376
  • [33] US Treatment Patterns of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Newly Initiated On Etanercept or Adalimumab.
    Zhang, Frank
    Li, Stan
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2012, 64 (10): : S946 - S946
  • [34] Etanercept and Adalimumab Treatment Patterns in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Enrolled in a Commercial Health Plan
    Benjamin Chastek
    Kathleen M. Fox
    Crystal Watson
    Shravanthi R. Gandra
    Advances in Therapy, 2012, 29 : 691 - 697
  • [35] Efficacy of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab in psoriatic arthritis based on ACR50 response after 24 weeks of treatment
    Brodszky, V.
    Pentek, M.
    Gulacsi, L.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 37 (05) : 399 - U4
  • [36] Recurrent hepatotoxicity associated with etanercept and adalimumab but not with infliximab in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis
    Titos Arcos, Jose Carlos
    Hallal, Hacibe
    Robles, Mercedes
    Andrade, Raul J.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2012, 104 (05) : 282 - 284
  • [37] US TREATMENT PATTERNS IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS NEWLY INITIATED ON ETANERCEPT OR ADALIMUMAB
    Zhang, F.
    Li, S.
    Curtis, J. R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A454 - A455
  • [38] Efficacy of etanercept in psoriatic patients previously treated with infliximab
    Pitarch, Gerard
    Luis Sanchez-Carazo, Jose
    Mahiques, Laura
    Oliver, Vicente
    DERMATOLOGY, 2008, 216 (04) : 312 - 316
  • [39] A cost-efficacy analysis of etanercept and infliximab in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis
    Yu, EB
    Woolley, JM
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 : 400 - 400
  • [40] Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation
    Woolacott, N.
    Vergel, Y. Bravo
    Hawkins, N.
    Kainth, A.
    Khadjesari, Z.
    Misso, K.
    Light, K.
    Asseburg, C.
    Palmer, S.
    Claxton, K.
    Bruce, I.
    Sculpher, M.
    Riemsma, R.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2006, 10 (31) : 1 - +