INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Bt CROPS AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS: A REVIEW

被引:26
|
作者
Venter, Hermoine J. [1 ]
Bohn, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] North West Univ, Unit Environm Sci & Management, Potchefstroom Campus, Potchefstroom, North West Prov, South Africa
[2] GenOk Ctr Biosafety, Tromso, Troms, Norway
关键词
Bt crops; Bt proteins; Aquatic ecosystems; THURINGIENSIS VAR. ISRAELENSIS; SHRIMP CARIDINA-NILOTICA; ZEBRAFISH DANIO-RERIO; CORN CRY1AB GENE; BACILLUS-THURINGIENSIS; TRANSGENIC RICE; DAPHNIA-MAGNA; MOSQUITO-CONTROL; LEPIDOPTERA-NOCTUIDAE; INSECTICIDAL PROTEIN;
D O I
10.1002/etc.3583
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The term Bt crops collectively refers to crops that have been genetically modified to include a gene (or genes) sourced from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) bacteria. These genes confer the ability to produce proteins toxic to certain insect pests. The interaction between Bt crops and adjacent aquatic ecosystems has received limited attention in research and risk assessment, despite the fact that some Bt crops have been in commercial use for 20 yr. Reports of effects on aquatic organisms such as Daphnia magna, Elliptio complanata, and Chironomus dilutus suggest that some aquatic species may be negatively affected, whereas other reports suggest that the decreased use of insecticides precipitated by Bt crops may benefit aquatic communities. The present study reviews the literature regarding entry routes and exposure pathways by which aquatic organisms may be exposed to Bt crop material, as well as feeding trials and field surveys that have investigated the effects of Bt-expressing plant material on such organisms. The present review also discusses how Bt crop development has moved past single-gene events, toward multigene stacked varieties that often contain herbicide resistance genes in addition to multiple Bt genes, and how their use (in conjunction with co-technology such as glyphosate/Roundup) may impact and interact with aquatic ecosystems. Lastly, suggestions for further research in this field are provided. (C) 2016 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:2891 / 2902
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biotic and Abiotic Degradation of Methylmercury in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Review
    Hongxia Du
    Ming Ma
    Yasuo Igarashi
    Dingyong Wang
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2019, 102 : 605 - 611
  • [43] Biotic and Abiotic Degradation of Methylmercury in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Review
    Du, Hongxia
    Ma, Ming
    Igarashi, Yasuo
    Wang, Dingyong
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 102 (05) : 605 - 611
  • [44] Review on DDT and metabolites in birds and mammals of aquatic ecosystems
    Hellou, Jocelyne
    Lebeuf, Michel
    Rudi, Marilynn
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2013, 21 (01): : 53 - 69
  • [45] A review on the environmental impacts of shipping on aquatic and nearshore ecosystems
    Jagerbrand, Annika K.
    Brutemark, Andreas
    Sveden, Jennie Barthel
    Gren, Ing-Marie
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 695
  • [46] Aquatic plants and ecotoxicological assessment in freshwater ecosystems: a review
    Simona Ceschin
    Amii Bellini
    Massimiliano Scalici
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 4975 - 4988
  • [47] Carrion ecology in inland aquatic ecosystems: a systematic review
    Orihuela-Torres, Adrian
    Morales-Reyes, Zebensui
    Hermoso, Virgilio
    Picazo, Felix
    Fernandez, David Sanchez
    Perez-Garcia, Juan M.
    Botella, Francisco
    Sanchez-Zapata, Jose A.
    Sebastian-Gonzalez, Esther
    BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2024, 99 (04) : 1425 - 1443
  • [48] PHENOLICS IN AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS - SELECTED REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE
    BUIKEMA, AL
    MCGINNISS, MJ
    CAIRNS, J
    MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1979, 2 (02) : 87 - 181
  • [49] Occurrence, fate and effects of azoxystrobin in aquatic ecosystems: A review
    Rodrigues, Elsa Teresa
    Lopes, Isabel
    Pardal, Miguel Angelo
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 53 : 18 - 28
  • [50] A review of the evidence for endocrine disruption in Canadian aquatic ecosystems
    McMaster, ME
    WATER QUALITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF CANADA, 2001, 36 (02): : 215 - 231