Standard and reduced doses of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study

被引:85
|
作者
Staerk, L. [1 ]
Gerds, T. A. [2 ]
Lip, G. Y. H. [3 ,4 ]
Ozenne, B. [2 ]
Bonde, A. N. [1 ]
Lamberts, M. [1 ]
Fosbol, E. L. [5 ]
Torp-Pedersen, C. [6 ,7 ]
Gislason, G. H. [1 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Olesen, J. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev & Gentofte, Dept Cardiol, Post 635,Kildegaardsvej 28, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Sect Biostat, Dept Publ Hlth, Copenhagen K, Denmark
[3] Univ Birmingham, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg Thrombosis Res Unit, Aalborg, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Rigshosp, Copenhagen O, Denmark
[6] Aalborg Univ, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Aalborg, Denmark
[7] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol & Epidemiol Biostat, Aalborg, Denmark
[8] Danish Heart Fdn, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Copenhagen N, Denmark
[10] Univ Southern Denmark, Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Copenhagen K, Denmark
关键词
apixaban; atrial fibrillation; dabigatran; dose; NOAC; rivaroxaban; ANTAGONIST ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS; TEMPORAL TRENDS; WARFARIN; SAFETY; RISK; MORTALITY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/joim.12683
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundComparative data of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are lacking in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). ObjectiveWe compared effectiveness and safety of standard and reduced dose NOAC in AF patients. MethodsUsing Danish nationwide registries, we included all oral anticoagulant-naive AF patients who initiated NOAC treatment (2012-2016). Outcome-specific and mortality-specific multiple Cox regressions were combined to compute average treatment effects as 1-year standardized differences in stroke and bleeding risks (g-formula). ResultsAmongst 31 522 AF patients, the distribution of NOAC/dose was as follows: dabigatran standard dose (22.4%), dabigatran-reduced dose (14.0%), rivaroxaban standard dose (21.8%), rivaroxaban reduced dose (6.7%), apixaban standard dose (22.9%), and apixaban reduced dose (12.2%). The 1-year standardized absolute risks of stroke/thromboembolism were 1.73-1.98% and 2.51-2.78% with standard and reduced NOAC dose, respectively, without statistically significant differences between NOACs for given dose level. Comparing standard doses, the 1-year standardized absolute risk (95% CI) for major bleeding was for rivaroxaban 2.78% (2.42-3.17%); corresponding absolute risk differences (95% CI) were for dabigatran -0.93% (-1.45% to -0.38%) and apixaban, -0.54% (-0.99% to -0.05%). The results for major bleeding were similar for reduced NOAC dose. The 1-year standardized absolute risk (95% CI) for intracranial bleeding was for standard dose dabigatran 0.19% (0.22-0.50%); corresponding absolute risk differences (95% CI) were for rivaroxaban 0.23% (0.06-0.41%) and apixaban, 0.18% (0.01-0.34%). ConclusionsStandard and reduced dose NOACs, respectively, showed no significant risk difference for associated stroke/thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher bleeding risk compared with dabigatran and apixaban and dabigatran was associated with lower intracranial bleeding risk compared with rivaroxaban and apixaban.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Dabigatran for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
    Hohnloser, S. H.
    Diener, H. -C.
    HAMOSTASEOLOGIE, 2012, 32 (03): : 216 - 220
  • [43] Secondary stroke prevention with apixaban in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A subgroup analysis of the STANDARD study
    Yasaka, Masahiro
    Umeyama, Michiaki
    Kataoka, Hirohide
    Inoue, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 29 (09):
  • [44] Reduced dose of rivaroxaban and dabigatran vs. vitamin K antagonists in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in a nationwide cohort study
    Fauchier, Laurent
    Blin, Patrick
    Sacher, Frederic
    Dureau-Pournin, Caroline
    Bernard, Marie-Agnes
    Lassalle, Regis
    Droz-Perroteau, Cecile
    Dallongeville, Jean
    Moore, Nicholas
    EUROPACE, 2020, 22 (02): : 205 - 215
  • [45] Apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban: which direct oral anticoagulant is the most cost-efficient for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation in Spain?
    Monreal, M.
    Soulard, S.
    Crespo, C.
    Brand, S.
    Kansal, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 497 - 497
  • [46] Relevance of P-glycoprotein in stroke prevention with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban
    Stoellberger, C.
    Finsterer, J.
    HERZ, 2015, 40 : 140 - 145
  • [47] EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF APIXABAN, RIVAROXABAN AND WARFARIN IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CKD AND ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A NATIONWIDE US COHORT STUDY
    Fu, Edouard
    Desai, Rishi
    Paik, Julie
    Kim, Dae
    Zhang, Yichi
    Mastrorilli, Julianna
    Cervone, Alexander
    Lin, Joshua
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 38 : I130 - I132
  • [48] Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
    Noseworthy, Peter A.
    Yao, Xiaoxi
    Abraham, Neena S.
    Sangaralingham, Lindsey R.
    McBane, Robert D.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    CHEST, 2016, 150 (06) : 1302 - 1312
  • [49] Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban vs. high TTR warfarin in atrial fibrillation
    Sjalander, Sara
    Sjogren, Vilhelm
    Renlund, Henrik
    Norrving, Bo
    Sjalander, Anders
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2018, 167 : 113 - 118
  • [50] Dabigatran but not rivaroxaban or apixaban treatment decreases fibrinolytic resistance in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Semeraro, Fabrizio
    Incampo, Francesca
    Ammollo, Concetta T.
    Dellanoce, Claudia
    Paoletti, Oriana
    Testa, Sophie
    Colucci, Mario
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2016, 138 : 22 - 29