Deweyan Democracy and the Rawlsian Problematic: A Reply to Joshua Forstenzer

被引：0
|
作者：
Talisse, Robert B. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
来源：
TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY | 2017年 / 53卷 / 04期
关键词：
John Dewey; Joshue Forstenzer; John Rawls; Democracy;
D O I：
10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.4.04
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
In "Deweyan Democracy, Robert Talisse, and the Fact of Reasonable Pluralism," Joshua Forstenzer defends Deweyan democracy against my argument that it fails an intuitive test for political legitimacy proposed by John Rawls. In this brief reply, I argue that although Forstenzer offers an attractive interpretation of Deweyan democracy, his defense nonetheless does not succeed, but arguably exacerbates the original difficulty.
引用
收藏
页码：579 / 583
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
12345