Comparative analysis of MIR168 promoters in three plant species

被引:2
|
作者
Qu, D. [1 ,2 ]
Yan, F. [3 ]
Li, M. A.
Varotto, C. [4 ]
Zhao, Z. Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Hort, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Apple E&T Res Ctr Shaanxi Prov, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Shaanxi Univ Technol, Shaanxi Prov Key Lab Bioresources, Hanzhong, Peoples R China
[4] Fdn Edmund Mach, Dept Biodivers & Mol Ecol, Michele Alladige, TN, Italy
关键词
MIR168; Promoter; Rice; Grape; ABSCISIC-ACID; SMALL RNAS; GENE; MICRORNAS; EXPRESSION; IDENTIFICATION; ARABIDOPSIS; INDUCTION; BIOGENESIS; SEQUENCES;
D O I
10.4238/gmr.15027684
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in the regulation of gene expression by post-transcriptionally targeting mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression. miR168 is a key miRNA because it regulates the expression of the slicer protein ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1), which catalyzes mRNA cleavage. Interestingly, plant miR168s are highly evolutionarily conserved; however, it is unclear whether MIR168 promoter elements and expression patterns are also conserved. Here, we isolated MIR168 promoters from monocot rice and dicot grape genomes. To determine the expression pattern, different promoters were fused to a beta-glucoronidase reporter gene and the resulting constructs were then transformed in Arabidopsis. The results revealed clear differences in the MIR168 promoter sequence of monocot and dicot plant species. Moreover, the pattern of MIR168 promoter expression differed between monocots and dicots. These results suggest that, unlike that of miR168, the MIR168 promoter is not conserved in monocots and dicots.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection and preliminary analysis of motifs in promoters of anaerobically induced genes of different plant species
    Mohanty, B
    Krishnan, SPT
    Swarup, S
    Bajic, VB
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2005, 96 (04) : 669 - 681
  • [32] Potentials of Bradyrhizobium species as promoters of plant growth in cotton
    Hafeez, FY
    Mushtaq, N
    Hameed, S
    Yasmin, S
    Malik, KA
    BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN FIXATION, SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 41 : 320 - 320
  • [33] Comparative analysis of otolith morphology in three species of Scomber
    Tao He
    Jiao Cheng
    Jian-guang Qin
    Yun Li
    Tian-xiang Gao
    Ichthyological Research, 2018, 65 : 192 - 201
  • [34] Comparative analysis of otolith morphology in three species of Scomber
    He, Tao
    Cheng, Jiao
    Qin, Jian-guang
    Li, Yun
    Gao, Tian-xiang
    ICHTHYOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 65 (02) : 192 - 201
  • [35] Comparative membrane proteome analysis of three Borrelia species
    Gesslbauer, Bernd
    Poljak, Albina
    Handwerker, Claudia
    Schueler, Wolfgang
    Schwendenwein, Daniel
    Weber, Corinna
    Lundberg, Urban
    Meinke, Andreas
    Kungl, Andreas J.
    PROTEOMICS, 2012, 12 (06) : 845 - 858
  • [36] Comparative functional analysis of three abiotic stress-inducible promoters in transgenic rice
    Rai, Mayank
    He, Chengkun
    Wu, Ray
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (05) : 787 - 799
  • [37] Comparative functional analysis of three abiotic stress-inducible promoters in transgenic rice
    Mayank Rai
    Chengkun He
    Ray Wu
    Transgenic Research, 2009, 18 : 787 - 799
  • [38] COMPARATIVE-STUDIES OF IRON INEFFICIENT PLANT-SPECIES WITH PLANT ANALYSIS
    ZAHARIEVA, T
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1986, 9 (3-7) : 939 - 946
  • [39] Comparative analysis among three Taiwan-specific Gentiana species and Chinese medicinal plant Gentiana scabra
    Shih-Hung Huang
    Emily hin-Fun Chen
    Chin-Tung Wu
    Chao-Lin Kuo
    Hsin-Sheng Tsay
    Botanical Studies, 54
  • [40] Assessing the distribution of soil organic carbon under three plant species across coastal sabkhas: A comparative analysis
    Shari, Kholoud Y. A.
    Alrumman, Sulaiman A.
    Eid, Ebrahem M.
    SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 10 (01):