Scots Pine Stem Parameters in Sites with Different Stand Densities in Lithuania

被引:7
|
作者
Beniusiene, Lina [1 ]
Silinskas, Benas [1 ]
Beniusis, Ricardas [2 ]
Aleinikovas, Marius [1 ]
Petrauskas, Edmundas [3 ]
Varnagiryte-Kabasinskiene, Iveta [1 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Res Ctr Agr & Forestry, Inst Forestry, Liepu Str 1, LT-53101 Girionys, Kaunas District, Lithuania
[2] Lithuanian State Forest Serv, Pramones Str 11A, LT-51327 Kaunas, Lithuania
[3] Vytautas Magnus Univ, Agr Acad, Studentu Str 11, LT-53361 Akademija, Kaunas District, Lithuania
来源
FORESTS | 2020年 / 11卷 / 07期
关键词
Pinus sylvestris; stand density; trees DBH; branch diameter; butt log; FOREST MANAGEMENT; BRANCH DIAMETER; RETENTION; SOUTHERN; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3390/f11070716
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different stand densities and thinning regimes on stem quality parameters, mainly branch characteristics, of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestrisL.) trees. The study provides some input to the discussion about Scots pine stem quality responses to different forest management practices in relatively young stands.Materials and Methods: Total tree height, height to the lowest live and dead branch, diameter at breast height (DBH), and diameter of all branches from the whorls located up to 6 m from the ground were measured. The linear regression models to predict branch diameter, as the main parameter for the stem quality assessment, were developed based on stand density and stem parameters.Results and Conclusions: DBH, branch diameter and number of branches up to 6-m stem height were significantly higher in the stands with the lowest density. These stem parameters showed a relatively clear downward trend from the lowest to the highest stand densities. The main identified variables which significantly affected stem quality, were branch diameter and diameter of the thickest branch in the bottom part of the stem, at least up to 3-m stem height. For practical use, the best fitted model was estimated when stand density, DBH, and branch diameter up to 3-m height were included in a single equation. The developed model for branch diameter could be used as a forest management tool for managing stem-wood quality.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modelling stand structure in young Scots pine dominated stands
    Siipilehto, J.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 257 (01) : 223 - 232
  • [32] ROOT DYNAMICS IN A YOUNG SCOTS PINE STAND IN CENTRAL SWEDEN
    PERSSON, H
    OIKOS, 1978, 30 (03) : 508 - 519
  • [33] Thinning response and thinning bias in a young Scots pine stand
    Pukkala, T
    Miina, J
    Palahí, M
    SILVA FENNICA, 2002, 36 (04) : 827 - 840
  • [34] Chemodiversity of a Scots pine stand and implications for terpene air concentrations
    Back, J.
    Aalto, J.
    Henriksson, M.
    Hakola, H.
    He, Q.
    Boy, M.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2012, 9 (02) : 689 - 702
  • [35] REGENERATION OF SCOTS PINE STEM AFTER WOUNDING
    Zajaczkowska, Urszula
    IAWA JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03) : 270 - 280
  • [36] GROWTH AND SELF-THINNING IN 2 YOUNG SCOTS PINE STANDS PLANTED AT DIFFERENT INITIAL DENSITIES
    NILSSON, U
    ALBREKTSON, A
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 68 (2-3) : 209 - 215
  • [37] The Effects of Tree and Stand Traits on the Specific Leaf Area in Managed Scots Pine Forests of Different Ages
    Blasiak, Agnieszka
    Wegiel, Andrzej
    Lukowski, Adrian
    Sulkowski, Slawomir
    Turski, Mieczyslaw
    FORESTS, 2021, 12 (04):
  • [38] Stand Density Control Diagrams for Scots pine and Austrian black pine plantations in Bulgaria
    Tatiana Vassileva Stankova
    Masato Shibuya
    New Forests, 2007, 34 : 123 - 141
  • [39] Stand Density Control Diagrams for Scots pine and Austrian black pine plantations in Bulgaria
    Stankova, Tatiana Vassileva
    Shibuya, Masato
    NEW FORESTS, 2007, 34 (02) : 123 - 141
  • [40] Forest carbon sequestration and harvests in Scots pine stand under different climate and nitrogen deposition scenarios
    Pussinen, A
    Karjalainen, T
    Mäkipää, R
    Valsta, L
    Kellomäki, S
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 158 (1-3) : 103 - 115