A comprehensive analysis of the credits obtained by LEED 2009 certified green buildings

被引:112
|
作者
Wu, Peng [1 ]
Song, Yongze [2 ]
Shou, Wenchi [2 ]
Chi, Hunglin [2 ]
Chong, Heap-Yih [1 ]
Sutrisna, Monty [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Built Environm, Dept Construct Management, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Australasian Joint Res Ctr Bldg Informat Modellin, Perth, WA, Australia
来源
关键词
LEED; Green building; Rating tool; Sustainable development; RATING SYSTEM; ENERGY; SUSTAINABILITY; SELECTION; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concept of green building has gained rapid recognition recently. Developed by the U.S. Green Building Council, the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is one of the most successful green building rating systems. Understanding the performance of LEED certified buildings on various LEED credits is therefore important for practitioners and regulatory authorities. This paper analyses the use of LEED 2009 and investigates the credit allocation pattern of 3416 LEED 2009 certified projects. The results show that compared to its previous version LEED v2.2, the point chasing problem in innovation related credits is mitigated. However, energy-related and material-related credits remain difficult for developers to obtain. LEED 2009 certified projects perform differently in water efficiency at the country level. At the state level, the projects perform differently in water efficiency, energy and atmosphere, material and resources, as well as indoor environmental quality. Varied credit achievement patterns are also identified on cross-certification and cross sector levels. The study offers a useful guidance for practitioners to achieve relevant certification levels and for regulatory authorities to continuously improve the rating system.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 379
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LEED 2009 Recertification of Existing Buildings: Bonus Effect
    Pushkar, Svetlana
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [42] Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption between Green Building Certified and Non-Certified Buildings in Korea
    No, Sangtae
    Won, Chungyeon
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (05)
  • [43] Green engineering of Hong Kong and China's first data centre certified to LEED-CS 2009 Platinum
    Cochrane H.
    Leong F.
    So S.
    Or G.
    Lai M.
    HKIE Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, 2018, 25 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [44] Energy and Greenhouse Gas Savings for LEED-Certified US Office Buildings
    Scofield, John H.
    Brodnitz, Susannah
    Cornell, Jakob
    Liang, Tian
    Scofield, Thomas
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (03)
  • [45] Properties of Pervious Concrete Aiming for LEED Green Building Rating System Credits
    Swe, Than Mar
    Jongvivatsakul, Pitcha
    Pansuk, Withit
    ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND, 2016, 20 (02): : 61 - 72
  • [46] GREEN BENEFITS ON EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS ACCORDING TO THE LEED CERTIFICATION
    Kim, Ji-Myong
    Son, Kiyoung
    Son, Seunghyun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 24 (02) : 83 - 89
  • [47] EVER GREEN: A POST-OCCUPANCY BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF LEED CERTIFIED HOMES IN NEW ENGLAND
    Beauregard, Sandy J.
    Berkland, Stephanie
    Hoque, Simi
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2011, 6 (04): : 138 - 145
  • [48] Sustainability Indicators of GRIHA Certified Green Buildings in India
    Ashokkumar, Velmurugan
    Palaniappan, Sivakumar
    Venkataraman, Aarthipriya
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2020: INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, : 590 - 598
  • [49] Analyzing the Perceived Benefits of LEED-Certified and Energy Star-Certified Buildings in the Realm of Local Economic Development
    Leland, Suzanne M.
    Read, Dustin C.
    Wittry, Michael
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2015, 29 (04) : 363 - 375
  • [50] A case study: Comparison of disinfection by-product formations between LEED-certified and non-certified buildings
    Kalan, Duygu
    Ozbek, Mehmet Egemen
    Omur-Ozbek, Pinar
    Dooley, Gregory
    DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 12