Photoelastic, microhardness and roughness analysis of zirconia and stainless steel crowns for primary molars

被引:0
|
作者
Espinoza, Emilia Valenzuela [1 ]
Palma-Dibb, Regina Guenka [2 ]
Torres, Carolina Paes [3 ]
Macedo, Ana Paula
Nelson-FIlho, Paulo [3 ]
Bezerra da Silva, Raquel Assed [3 ]
Lucisano, Marilia Pacifico [3 ]
Bezerra da Silva, Lea Assed [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Restorat Dent, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Pediat Dent, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthesis, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY | 2022年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; PRIMARY DENTITION; DEFECTS; ENAMEL; WEAR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the stress distribution through photoelasticity, microhardness and roughness of intact crowns of primary molars (CC) and the preformed crowns of stainless steel (SSC) and zirconia (ZC) used in dental restorations in pediatric dentistry. Methods: Six healthy primary molars were selected. For the photoelastic models, the teeth were fixed in photoelastic resin. A load of 100 N was applied, and the models were analyzed by transmission polariscope. The Tardy method was used to quantify the fringe order which calculates the maximum stress (T) value in each selected point. The teeth were prepared for cementation of the crowns. The photoelastic test was repeated for each experimental crown. Knoop microhardness was assessed on the buccal surfaces of the CCs, SSCs, and ZCs using a microhardness tester. Parameters were 50 gf for 5 seconds. Roughness was evaluated using a confocal 3-D laser scanning microscope/software at 216x magnification. Roughness average (Ra) values from each model (expressed in m) were collected and group means were calculated. The stress distribution, microhardness, and roughness data were compared by using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey's test (a= 0.05). Results: There was no difference in the stress distribution for the CCs, SSCs and ZCs. For the microhardness analysis, the ZCs obtained the highest values compared to the CCs and the SSCs (P< 0.001). The CCs were significantly higher than the SSCs (P= 0.027). There was no difference in roughness for the three models (P= 0.615). The SSCs and ZCs showed satisfactory mechanical behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 19
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns
    Sonmez, D.
    Duruturk, L.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2010, 208 (09) : 408 - 409
  • [22] In Vitro Retentive Effect of Groove, Sandblasting, and Cement Type on Stainless Steel Crowns in Primary Molars
    Pathak, Sidhant
    Shashibhushan, K. K.
    Bharath, K. P.
    Poornima, P.
    Reddy, V. V. Subba
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 37 (04) : 339 - 341
  • [23] Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial
    Mebin George Mathew
    S. R. Samuel
    Ashu Jagdish Soni
    Korishettar Basavaraj Roopa
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020, 24 : 3275 - 3280
  • [24] Restorations Versus Stainless Steel Crowns in Primary Molars: A Retrospective Split-Mouth Study
    Wu, Erica
    Yang, Yu-Ju
    Munz, Stephanie M.
    Hsiao, Chu-Chun
    Boynton, James R.
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 43 (04) : 290 - 295
  • [25] Evaluation of adhesion ofStreptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial
    Mathew, Mebin George
    Samuel, S. R.
    Soni, Ashu Jagdish
    Roopa, Korishettar Basavaraj
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (09) : 3275 - 3280
  • [26] Absorption of Nickel, Chromium, and Iron by the Root Surface of Primary Molars Covered with Stainless Steel Crowns
    Keinan, David
    Mass, Eliyahu
    Zilberman, Uri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2010, 2010
  • [27] UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry: stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars
    Kindelan, S. A.
    Day, P.
    Nichol, R.
    Willmott, N.
    Fayle, S. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2008, 18 : 20 - 28
  • [28] Comparison of the morphology of the primary first molars and the forms of stainless steel crowns used in clinical practice
    Chao, Tzu Ting
    Tsai, Hung Huey
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 47 (03) : 71 - 83
  • [29] Use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars in Germany: Questionnaire-based cross-sectional analysis
    Santamaria, Ruth Madeleyne
    Pawlowitz, Laura
    Schmoeckel, Julian
    Alkilzy, Mohammad
    Splieth, Christian Heinz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 28 (06) : 587 - 594
  • [30] Are zirconia crowns the superior choice when restoring primary posterior molars?
    Kelly, Niamh
    Lamont, Thomas
    EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY, 2022, 23 (02) : 72 - 73