Osteomyelitis: Etiology, diagnosis, treatment and outcome in a public versus a private institution

被引:19
|
作者
Lobati, F [1 ]
Herndon, B [1 ]
Bamberger, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Infect Dis Sect, Dept Med, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
关键词
osteomyelitis; treatment outcome; medical specialties; hospitals; teaching; case management;
D O I
10.1007/s15010-001-1134-6
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Although bone infections are difficult to diagnose and manage, primary health care providers often give comprehensive care to patients with few referrals. To evaluate how trends in care impact upon management of bone infections, we performed a retrospective review of medical records of 198 osteomyelitis patients. Patients and Methods: 130 patients were hospitalized at a private institution and 68 were hospitalized at a public (teaching) institution. Outcomes measured were bone salvage or Loss in relation to predisposing co-morbidities and infectious disease (ID) physician involvement in the patient care. Results: Co-morbidities predominating at the public and private hospitals, respectively, were presence of metal implants (20% and 37%) and diabetes (32% and 31%). The most common pathogens at the public and private hospitals, respectively, were methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, 16 and 32%) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, 3% and 31%). ID specialists treated Longer with iv antibiotics (42 and 43.5 median treatment days) than non-ID specialists (14 and 7 median treatment days). When ID specialists were involved in case management, a trend to bone salvage was seen at the public hospital (p < 0.09). Conclusion: Osteomyelitis patient outcome varies less by hospital setting than by case management.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 336
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON OF PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT IN PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC SECTORS IN CHRISTCHURCH
    Nair, S. M.
    Mark, S.
    Buchan, N.
    Davidson, P.
    Bax, K.
    Kueppers, F.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 : 37 - 37
  • [32] Comparison of prostate cancer treatment in private versus public sectors in Christchurch
    Nair, S.
    Mark, S.
    Buchan, N.
    Davidson, P.
    Bax, K.
    Kueppers, F.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 : 59 - 59
  • [33] Outcome of corneal transplantation in a private institution in Saudi Arabia
    Omar, Nazri
    Chacra, Charbel T. Bou
    Tabbara, Khalid F.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 7 : 1311 - 1317
  • [34] Epidemiology and Outcome of Microbial Keratitis: Private University Versus Urban Public Hospital Care
    Truong, David T.
    Minh-Thuy Bui
    Cavanagh, H. Dwight
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 44 : S82 - S86
  • [35] Public vs private narratives in pathways to diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer
    Yu, Yao
    Bergin, Rebecca
    White, Vicki
    Emery, Jon
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2020, 26 (04) : LXI - LXI
  • [36] BBC - PUBLIC INSTITUTION AND PRIVATE WORLD - BURNS,T
    PETERSON, RA
    CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 1978, 7 (06) : 768 - 769
  • [37] BBC - PUBLIC INSTITUTION AND PRIVATE WORLD - BURNS,T
    ADLER, TP
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF SPEECH, 1979, 65 (04) : 439 - 445
  • [38] 'BBC PUBLIC INSTITUTION AND PRIVATE WORLD' - BURNS,T
    ANNAN, N
    TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 1977, (3941): : 1147 - 1148
  • [39] BBC - PUBLIC INSTITUTION AND PRIVATE WORLD - BURNS,T
    TRIBE, K
    SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 26 (02): : 423 - 424
  • [40] BBC - PUBLIC INSTITUTION AND PRIVATE WORLD - BURNS,T
    KUMAR, K
    NEW UNIVERSITIES QUARTERLY, 1978, 32 (03): : 369 - 374