Study protocol: a mixed-methods realist evaluation of the Universal Health Visiting Pathway in Scotland

被引:4
|
作者
Doi, Lawrence [1 ]
Morrison, Kathleen [1 ]
Astbury, Ruth [2 ]
Eunson, Jane [3 ]
Horne, Margaret A. [4 ]
Jepson, Ruth [1 ]
Marryat, Louise [5 ]
Ormston, Rachel [3 ]
Wood, Rachael [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Hlth Social Sci, Scottish Collaborat Publ Hlth Res & Policy, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ West Scotland, Sch Hlth & Life Sci, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland
[3] Ipsos MORI Scotland, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Salvensen Mindroom Res Ctr, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] NHS Scotland Natl Serv Div, Informat Serv Div, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[7] Univ Edinburgh, Child Life & Hlth, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 12期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
public health; community child health; health policy; maternal medicine;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042305
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The growing political emphasis on the early years reflects the importance of these formative years of life. Health visitors in the UK are uniquely positioned to improve health outcomes for children and families and to reduce health inequalities. Recently, there has been a policy change in Scotland in an attempt to enhance the delivery of the universal health visiting service. This study aims to examine the extent to which the enhanced Universal Health Visiting Pathway is implemented and delivered across Scotland and to assess any associated impacts. Methods and analysis A mixed-methods study incorporating four methodological components and uses realist evaluation as the overall conceptual framework. It comprises three phases (1) initial programme theory development; (2) programme theory validation and (3) programme theory refinement. The programme theory validation will use interview and focus group data of parents and health visitors, and conduct a case note review at five study sites. It also involves a national survey of parents and health visitors and routine data analysis of existing secondary data. The analyses of the ensuing qualitative and quantitative data will be carried out using a convergent mixed-methods approach to ensure continuous triangulation of multiple data. The findings of the evaluation will provide contextually relevant understanding of how the Universal Health Visiting Pathway works and evidence the impact of increased investments in health visiting in Scotland. Ethics and dissemination This protocol has been approved by the School of Health in Social Science Research Ethics Committee, University of Edinburgh. Additional approvals have been granted/will be sought from the Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for health and social care in Scotland for the case note review, survey and routine data analysis elements of the evaluation. The findings will be prepared as reports to the funders and presented at conferences. It will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Researching two Compassionate Cities: study protocol for a mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation
    Quintiens, Bert
    Smets, Tinne
    Chambaere, Kenneth
    Van Den Block, Lieve
    Deliens, Luc
    Cohen, Joachim
    PALLIATIVE CARE & SOCIAL PRACTICE, 2022, 16
  • [32] Universal-offer HIV testing in primary care: A mixed-methods evaluation of a pilot study
    Wenlock, Rhys
    Dhillon, Syra
    Perera, Sean
    Vera, Jaime
    Llewellyn, Carrie
    Dean, Gillian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2024, 35 (04) : 280 - 286
  • [33] Electronic Clinical Communications Implementation (ECCI) in Scotland: a mixed-methods programme evaluation
    Pagliari, C
    Gilmour, M
    Sullivan, F
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 10 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [34] Understanding integrated care pathways in palliative care using realist evaluation: a mixed methods study protocol
    Dalkin, Sonia Michelle
    Jones, Diana
    Lhussier, Monique
    Cunningham, Bill
    BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (04):
  • [35] Realist Approach to Social Policies (RASP) study to reduce socioeconomic health inequalities through systems change: protocol for a research project combining mixed-methods realist research with institutional action research
    Van Berkel, Jantien
    de Bruijn, Ernst-Jan
    Waardenburg, Maikel
    la Grouw, Yvonne
    van Bennekom, Eline
    van der Horst, Hilje
    Tonnon, Susanne
    Haggenburg- Mohammed, Milou
    Haveman-Nies, Annemien
    Madern, Tamara
    Knoef, Marike
    de Vet, Emely
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [36] Evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Sattoe, Jane N. T.
    Peeters, Marielle A. C.
    Hilberink, Sander R.
    Ista, Erwin
    van Staa, AnneLoes
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (08):
  • [37] Nature videos for PTSD: protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study
    Knaust, Thiemo
    Felnhofer, Anna
    Kothgassner, Oswald David
    Reinke, Max
    Browning, Matthew
    Hoellmer, Helge
    Schulz, Holger
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 13 (02)
  • [38] Protocol for a mixed-methods study of supplemental oxygen in pulmonary fibrosis
    Belkin, Amanda
    Fier, Kaitlin
    Albright, Karen
    Baird, Susan
    Crowe, Brenda
    Eres, Linda
    Korn, Marjorie
    Maginn, Leslie
    McCormick, Mark
    Root, Elisabeth D.
    Vierzba, Thomas
    Wamboldt, Frederick S.
    Swigris, Jeffrey J.
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2014, 14
  • [39] Mixed-methods study protocol for an evaluation of the mental health transition navigator model in child and adolescent mental health services: the Navigator Evaluation Advancing Transitions (NEAT) study
    Cleverley, Kristin
    Stevens, Katye
    Davies, Julia
    McCann, Emma
    Ashley, Tracy
    Brathwaite, Daneisha
    Gebreyohannes, Mana
    Nasir, Saba
    O'Reilly, Katelyn
    Bennett, Kathryn J.
    Brennenstuhl, Sarah
    Charach, Alice
    Henderson, Joanna
    Jeffs, Lianne
    Korczak, Daphne J.
    Monga, Suneeta
    de Oliveira, Claire
    Szatmari, Peter
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (06): : e051190
  • [40] Second opinion programmes in Germany: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Bruch, Dunja
    May, Susann
    Prediger, Barbara
    Koensgen, Nadja
    Alexandrov, Alexander
    Maehlmann, Sonja
    Voss, Karl
    Liersch, Sebastian
    Loh, Jan-Christoph
    Christensen, Bernd
    Franzen, Achim
    von Peter, Sebastian
    Pieper, Dawid
    Ronckers, Cecile
    Neugebauer, Edmund
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):