Point-of-use treatment and the revised arsenic MCL

被引:0
|
作者
Gurian, PL
Small, MJ
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Dept Civil Engn, El Paso, TX 79902 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Engn & Publ Policy & Civil & Environm Engn Dept, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Community water systems (CWSs) may comply with the US Environmental Protection Agency's new 10-mug/L arsenic (As) standard using point-of-use (POU) treatment by reverse osmosis; however, current regulations do not specify exactly how a CWS should implement POU treatment. This article describes three scenarios for implementing a POU program and provides cost estimates for each scenario. These costs vary significantly depending on the amount of monitoring and maintenance assistance provided for each POU unit. The scenario with less-frequent (triannual) As monitoring and annual maintenance assistance to the customer could be substantially less expensive than centralized treatment for many small CWSs. The triannual As monitoring is supplemented by more frequent conductivity measurements to ensure proper operation of the individual POU treatment units. The higher-cost scenario, which includes a quarterly As monitoring schedule more typical of recent POU applications, is likely to be more expensive than centralized treatment for most CWSs. Although most CWSs would probably not adopt POU treatment as the preferred method of compliance with a stricter As standard under the current regulations, a POU treatment program may be a less-costly variance option for CWSs for which centralized treatment is not economically feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 108
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TESTING AND EVALUATING POINT-OF-USE TREATMENT DEVICES IN CANADA
    TOBIN, RS
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1987, 79 (10): : 42 - 45
  • [22] Adsorbent-based point-of-use system for arsenic removal in rural areas
    Petrusevski, B
    Boere, J
    Shahidullah, SM
    Sharma, SK
    Schippers, JC
    JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2002, 51 (03): : 135 - 144
  • [23] POINT-OF-USE AND POINT-OF-ENTRY TREATMENT ON LONG ISLAND.
    DeFilippi, John A.
    Baier, Joseph H.
    Journal of applied chemistry of the USSR, 1987, 60 (1 pt 2): : 76 - 81
  • [24] POINT-OF-USE AND POINT-OF-ENTRY WATER-TREATMENT SYSTEMS
    BELLEN, GE
    STEVENS, TG
    DRINKING WATER TREATMENT: SMALL SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES, 1989, : 143 - 158
  • [25] Generation at point-of-use of BHF
    Verhaverbeke, S
    Liu, L
    SOLID STATE PHENOMENA, 1999, 65-6 : 267 - 270
  • [26] BACTERIAL COLONIZATION OF POINT-OF-USE WATER TREATMENT DEVICES.
    Geldreich, Edwin E.
    Taylor, Raymond H.
    Blannon, Janet C.
    Reasoner, Donald J.
    Journal / American Water Works Association, 1985, 77 (02): : 72 - 80
  • [27] Whole-house arsenic water treatment provided more effective arsenic exposure reduction than point-of-use water treatment at New Jersey homes with arsenic in well water
    Spayd, Steven E.
    Robson, Mark G.
    Buckley, Brian T.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 505 : 1361 - 1369
  • [28] POINT-OF-USE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY TO CONTROL ORGANIC AND INORGANIC CONTAMINATION
    BELLEN, G
    ANDERSON, M
    GOTTLER, RA
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1984, 76 (04): : 54 - 54
  • [29] Drinking water quality & point-of-use treatment studies in Nepal
    Bittner, Andy
    Khayyat, Amer M.A.
    Luu, Kim
    Maag, Benoit
    Murcott, Susan E.
    Pinto, Patricia M.
    Sagara, Junko
    Wolfe, Andrea
    Civil Engineering Practice, 2002, 17 (01): : 5 - 24
  • [30] Point-of-Entry (POE) and Point-of-Use (POU) water treatment overview
    Harrison, JF
    PROVIDING SAFE DRINKING WATER IN SMALL SYSTEMS: TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIONS, AND ECONOMICS, 1999, : 293 - 296