High-Efficiency Power Cycles for Particle-Based Concentrating Solar Power Plants: Thermodynamic Optimization and Critical Comparison

被引:3
|
作者
Angel Reyes-Belmonte, Miguel [1 ]
Rovense, Francesco [2 ]
机构
[1] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Chem Energy & Mech Technol, Calle Tulipan, Madrid 28933, Spain
[2] LEAP Scarl, Lab Energia & Ambiente Piacenza, Via Nino Bixio 27-C, I-29121 Piacenza, Italy
关键词
power cycles; particle receivers; thermodynamic optimization; solar energy; THERMOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; HEAT-EXCHANGER; BRAYTON CYCLE; DESIGN; GENERATION; SUSPENSION; RECEIVERS; SYSTEMS; CSP;
D O I
10.3390/en15228579
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper investigates and compares several highly efficient thermodynamic cycles that are suitable for coupling with particle-in-tube fluidized-bed solar receiver technology. In such a receiver, high-temperature particles are used as both a heat transfer fluid and a storage medium. A dense particle suspension (DPS) is created through an upward bubbling fluidized-bed (UBFB) flow inside the receiver tubes, which constitutes the "particle-in-tube" solar receiver concept. Reaching higher temperatures is seen as a key factor for future cost reductions in the solar plant, as this leads to both higher power conversion efficiency and increased energy storage density. Three advanced thermodynamic cycles are analyzed in this work: the supercritical steam Rankine cycle (s-steam), supercritical carbon dioxide cycle (s-CO2) and integrated solar combined cycle (ISCC). For each one, 100% solar contribution, which is considered the total thermal input to the power cycle, can be satisfied by the solar particle receiver. The main findings show that the s-CO2 cycle is the most suitable thermodynamic cycle for the DPS solar plant, exhibiting a net cycle efficiency above 50% for a moderate temperature range (680-730 degrees C). For the other advanced power cycles, 45.35% net efficiency can be achieved for the s-steam case, while the efficiency of the ISCC configuration is limited to 45.23% for the solar-only operation mode.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High-efficiency Solar Power supply Design
    Yang, Hong
    Huang, Wenqi
    Wang, Zhenfei
    Chen, Longguang
    Yin, Yao
    ADVANCED DESIGNS AND RESEARCHES FOR MANUFACTURING, PTS 1-3, 2013, 605-607 : 433 - 437
  • [22] Thermodynamic Cycle Concepts for High-Efficiency Power Plans. Part A: Public Power Plants 60+
    Kosowski, Krzysztof
    Tucki, Karol
    Piwowarski, Marian
    Stepien, Robert
    Orynycz, Olga
    Wlodarski, Wojciech
    Baczyk, Anna
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (02)
  • [23] Thermodynamic Cycle Concepts for High-Efficiency Power Plants. Part B: Prosumer and Distributed Power Industry
    Kosowski, Krzysztof
    Tucki, Karol
    Piwowarski, Marian
    Stepien, Robert
    Orynycz, Olga
    Wlodarski, Wojciech
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [24] Simulated Annealing Particle Swarm Optimization for High-Efficiency Power Amplifier Design
    Li, Chuan
    You, Fei
    Yao, Tingting
    Wang, Jinchen
    Shi, Wen
    Peng, Jun
    He, Songbai
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, 2021, 69 (05) : 2494 - 2505
  • [25] Spectral splitting optimization for high-efficiency solar photovoltaic and thermal power generation
    Bierman, David M.
    Lenert, Andrej
    Wang, Evelyn N.
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2016, 109 (24)
  • [26] Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of single and combined power cycles for concentrated solar power applications
    Javanshir, Alireza
    Sarunac, Nenad
    Razzaghpanah, Zahra
    ENERGY, 2018, 157 : 65 - 75
  • [27] Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles with multi-heating in Concentrating Solar Power plants
    Gonzalez-Portillo, Luis F.
    Munoz-Anton, Javier
    Martinez-Val, Jose M.
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 207 : 144 - 156
  • [28] Development of high-efficiency USC power plants in Denmark
    Blum, HJR
    Hald, J
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED STEAM PLANT - NEW MATERIALS AND PLANT DESIGNS AND THEIR PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE CCGT AND CONVENTIONAL POWER STATIONS, 1997, 1997 (02): : 3 - 16
  • [29] Comparison of actual Levelized Cost of Electricity of solar thermal concentrating solar power plants
    Boretti, A.
    Castelletto, S.
    Al-Kouz, W.
    Nayfeh, J.
    2020 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING, 2021, 633
  • [30] A high-efficiency triple cycle for solar power generation
    Kribus, A
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2002, 72 (01) : 1 - 11