NHS-funded IVF: consequences of NICE implementation

被引:5
|
作者
Goswami, M. [1 ]
Hyslop, L. A. [1 ]
Murdoch, A. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Fertil Ctr Life, Int Ctr Life, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4EP, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Cumulative pregnancy rates; IVF; NICE guidelines; NHS; defaulters; treatment time; CUMULATIVE PREGNANCY RATES; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; DROP-OUT; SPERM INJECTION; SUCCESS RATES; LIVE BIRTH; FOLLOW-UP; CYCLES; COHORT;
D O I
10.3109/14647273.2013.786840
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends that all subfertile women of < 40 years should be entitled to up to three IVF treatment cycles funded by the NHS. The full criteria have been implemented at The Newcastle Fertility Centre at Life since August 2009. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in terms of analysing the cumulative pregnancy rates. A retrospective analysis of data from 812 couples who started their first NHS-funded treatment after August 2009 was undertaken until there were 100 couples who had completed the three treatments. Cumulative pregnancy rates were calculated using life table analysis, and time intervals between treatments were recorded. The number of couples having first, second and third treatment cycles was 812, 298 and 100, respectively. The cumulative clinical pregnancy rates per each fresh cycle were 30.1%, 50.2% and 60.2%, and when frozen embryo transfers were included, they were 33.5%, 53.4% and 62.7%. The median + 2SD time interval between treatments was 11 and 10 months; 90.2% of the women were likely to complete up to three NHS-funded treatment cycles until they achieved a pregnancy. The NICE criteria offer most couples a chance of pregnancy, and the majority will take up the opportunity of undergoing three treatment cycles if required. The time interval between treatments indicated that it will take < 2 years for couples to complete the full course of NHS-funded treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 127
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Summative service and stakeholder evaluation of an NHS-funded community Pharmacy Emergency Repeat Medication Supply Service (PERMSS) (vol 6, e009736, 2016)
    Nazar, H.
    Nazar, Z.
    Simpson, J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (05):
  • [22] NHS dental service 'privately' funded
    Serrano-Davey, J
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1998, 184 (12) : 579 - 579
  • [23] NHS White Paper: a NICE idea
    Kerr, D
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF LONDON, 1998, 32 (01): : 5 - 5
  • [24] Assessing the effects of changes in care commissioning guidelines at a tertiary centre in London on the provision of NHS-funded procedures of limited clinical effectiveness: an 11-year retrospective database analysis
    Rahman, Shafiq
    Langridge, Benjamin
    Hachach-Haram, Nadine
    Hansen, Esther
    Bootle, Anna
    Bystrzonowski, Nicola
    Hamilton, Stephen
    Mosahebi, Afshin
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (07):
  • [25] The unintended consequences of NICE
    Giovannoni, Gavin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 90 (03): : 247 - 248
  • [26] Transsexuals win case for NHS funded surgery
    Dyer, C
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7176): : 75 - 75
  • [27] CONSEQUENCES OF THE NHS DISPUTE
    LEDINGHAM, IM
    MACFARLANE, PS
    ALLAN, JG
    LANCET, 1982, 2 (8299): : 668 - 668
  • [28] NHS finances must improve for NICE guidance
    不详
    PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 275 (7366): : 299 - 299
  • [29] The role of NICE technology appraisal in NHS rationing
    Walker, Simon
    Palmer, Stephen
    Sculpher, Mark
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 81-82 : 51 - 64
  • [30] NICE rejects trastuzumab emtansine for use on NHS
    Kmietowicz, Zosia
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 351