Myocardial viability imaging using a novel non-breath-hold cardiac MRI protocol: a comparative assessment with 18F-FDG PET

被引:2
|
作者
Aggarwal, Rohit [1 ]
Singla, Geetika [2 ]
Singh, Harkirat [3 ]
George, Raju Augustine [2 ]
Mukhopadhyay, Indrani [4 ]
机构
[1] 7 Air Force Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nathu Singh Rd,Kanpur Cantonment, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Command Hosp Air Force, Dept Radiol, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[3] Mil Hosp Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
[4] Armed Forces Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Pune, Maharashtra, India
来源
关键词
Myocardial viability; Magnetic resonance imaging; Positron emission tomography; LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; REVASCULARIZATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-020-00294-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Delayed contrast enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a well-established MRI technique for the evaluation of myocardial tissue viability. A comprehensive cardiac MRI protocol for myocardial viability comprises of multiple breath hold sequences to provide information regarding chamber volumes, myocardial mass, and function in addition to viability. However, its routine use is limited mainly by lengthy acquisition time and patient's inability to hold breath in multiple breath hold sequences. The important question to which the referring cardiologists/cardiac surgeons are seeking answer is that "What are the viable vascular territories that will benefit from revascularization?" In this study, we have analyzed the utility of non-breath-hold rapid delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac MR imaging protocol for myocardial viability assessment with 18-flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18-FDG PET) as the reference standard. Results Forty patients of ischemic heart disease who met the inclusion criteria were included. All patients underwent both(18)F-FDG PET and delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as per the non-breath-hold protocol. In this free-breathing protocol, the breath hold cine sequences were omitted and, after localizers, post-contrast scans were obtained with a time gap of 15 min post-contrast administration. A total number of 680 myocardial segments and corresponding 120 vascular territories were assessed. MRI and(18)F-FDG PET images were analyzed using a 17-segment model as proposed by AHA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of non-breath-hold rapid delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac MR imaging protocol for assessing myocardial viability (on segment analysis) was 95.5%, 65.59%, 88.0%, and 84.72%, respectively, and of vascular territory analysis were 96.77%, 92.59%, 97.83%, and 89.29%, respectively, in relation to(18)F-FDG PET used as the reference standard. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient is 0.62. Conclusion This modified non-breath-hold delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac MR imaging protocol is a reliable tool to answer the clinically relevant question of myocardial viability with a significant reduction in acquisition time and overcomes the limiting need of breath hold.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cardiac PET/MRI Imaging of Inflammation Using a Combined Constant Infusion of 18F-FDG and Gd-DTPA
    Thiessen, Jonathan
    Prato, Frank
    Ferlisi, Frank
    Ahmed, Hasan
    Butler, John
    Sykes, Jane
    Kovacs, Michael
    Thompson, Robert
    Wisenberg, Gerald
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (03)
  • [32] Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for the assessment of multiple myeloma
    Sachpekidis, C.
    Hillengass, J.
    Goldschmidt, H.
    Mosebach, J.
    Schlemmer, H.
    Haberkorn, U.
    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 : S324 - S324
  • [33] Assessment of idiopathic myelofibrosis using 18F-FDG PET
    Kauppila, M.
    Kajander, S.
    Koskela, K.
    Savisto, N.
    Pelliniemi, T. T.
    Remes, K.
    Seppanen, M.
    HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 92 : 374 - 374
  • [34] Cardiac MRI vs. myocardial 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with clinical concern for cardiac sarcoid
    Nam Ju Lee
    Bongju Lee
    Harold Litt
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17 (Suppl 1)
  • [35] Prognostic Implications of Imaging-Based Bone Marrow Assessment in Lymphoma: 18F-FDG PET, MR Imaging, or 18F-FDG PET/MR Imaging?
    Adams, Hugo J. A.
    Kwee, Thomas C.
    Nievelstein, Rutger A. J.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 54 (11) : 2017 - 2018
  • [36] THE DEVELOPMENT OF A DIETARY PREPARATION PROTOCOL FOR OPTIMAL INFLAMMATORY IMAGING USING 18F-FDG PET
    Wicks, Eleanor
    Menezes, Leon
    Blanchflower, Shane
    Barnes, Anna
    Groves, Ashley
    Elliott, Perry
    HEART, 2016, 102 : A87 - A87
  • [37] Comparative Performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detection and Characterization of Pulmonary Lesions in 121 Oncologic Patients
    Sawicki, Lino M.
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Buchbender, Christian
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt M.
    Gomez, Benedikt
    Ruhlmann, Verena
    Wetter, Axel
    Umutlu, Lale
    Antoch, Gerald
    Heusch, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (04) : 582 - 586
  • [38] Multimodality imaging in evaluation of skeletal disease in multiple myeloma: a comparative 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/MRI and diffusion weighted MR imaging (DWI/MR) study
    Sachpekidis, C.
    Mosebach, J.
    Delorme, S.
    Schlemmer, H.
    Wilhelm, T.
    Haberkorn, U.
    Hillengass, J.
    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2014, 41 : S407 - S407
  • [39] Normal 18F-FDG cerebral uptake pattern with PET/MRI imaging
    Guo, Jinxia
    Xu, Yuanfan
    Wang, Shifeng
    Li, Feng
    Yu, Dangfan
    Li, Chengzhou
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 60
  • [40] Assessment of myocardial function with interactive non-breath-hold real-time MR imaging:: Comparison with echocardiography and breath-hold cine MR imaging
    Kühl, HP
    Spuentrup, E
    Wall, A
    Franke, A
    Schröder, J
    Heussen, N
    Hanrath, P
    Günther, RW
    Buecker, A
    RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (01) : 198 - 207