Understanding product cost vs. performance through an in-depth system Monte Carlo analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Sanson, Mark C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Corning Inc, 60 OConnor Rd, Fairport, NY 14450 USA
关键词
Optical Design; Optical tolerancing; metrology tolerancing; Monte Carlo tolerancing;
D O I
10.1117/12.2272494
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The manner in which an optical system is toleranced and compensated greatly affects the cost to build it. By having a detailed understanding of different tolerance and compensation methods, the end user can decide on the balance of cost and performance. A detailed phased approach Monte Carlo analysis can be used to demonstrate the tradeoffs between cost and performance. In complex high performance optical systems, performance is fine-tuned by making adjustments to the optical systems after they are initially built. This process enables the overall best system performance, without the need for fabricating components to stringent tolerance levels that often can be outside of a fabricator's manufacturing capabilities. A good performance simulation of as built performance can interrogate different steps of the fabrication and build process. Such a simulation may aid the evaluation of whether the measured parameters are within the acceptable range of system performance at that stage of the build process. Finding errors before an optical system progresses further into the build process saves both time and money. Having the appropriate tolerances and compensation strategy tied to a specific performance level will optimize the overall product cost.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monte Carlo vs. Fuzzy Monte Carlo Simulation for Uncertainty and Global Sensitivity Analysis
    Kim, Young-Jin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):
  • [2] Understanding Mold Wear Mechanisms and Optimizing Performance through Nico Coating: An In-Depth Analysis
    Jiang, Xionghua
    Kong, Fengyu
    METALS, 2023, 13 (12)
  • [3] High-Performance Quasi-Monte Carlo Financial Simulation: FPGA vs. GPP vs. GPU
    Tian, Xiang
    Benkrid, Khaled
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON RECONFIGURABLE TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS, 2010, 3 (04)
  • [4] Proton range verification in inhomogeneous tissue: Treatment planning system vs. measurement vs. Monte Carlo simulation
    Kim, Dae-Hyun
    Cho, Sungkoo
    Jo, Kwanghyun
    Shin, EunHyuk
    Hong, Chae-Seon
    Han, Youngyih
    Suh, Tae-Suk
    Lim, Do Hoon
    Choi, Doo Ho
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [5] Alteplase vs. Tenecteplase: An In-depth Analysis of Their Relative Effectiveness in Treating Acute Ischaemic Stroke
    Azhar, Muhammad Juniad
    Butt, Ayesha Imran
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 74 (11) : 2032 - 2033
  • [6] Monte Carlo-based in-depth morphological analysis of medullary cavity for designing personalized femoral stem
    Wang, Lin
    Sun, Hui
    Guo, Kaijin
    He, Kunjin
    Geng, Weizhong
    Zhou, Wen
    Wei, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [7] An in-depth analysis of Markov-Chain Monte Carlo ensemble samplers for inverse vadose zone modeling
    Brunetti, Giuseppe
    Simunek, Jiri
    Woehling, Thomas
    Stumpp, Christine
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 624
  • [8] Polynomial chaos expansion vs. Monte Carlo simulation in a stochastic analysis of wave propagation
    Herbut, Aneta
    Brzakala, Wlodzimierz
    WAVE MOTION, 2024, 130
  • [9] On the choice of measured depth dose data for the Monte Carlo modeling of the 18 MV photon beam: Shifted vs. unshifted
    Cho, S
    Vassiliev, O
    Liu, H
    Ibbott, G
    Mohan, R
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1906 - 1906
  • [10] In-depth analysis of cost structure for electroconvulsive therapy in a performance-based hospital budget
    Lehnhardt, Fritz-Georg
    Dohle, Ines
    Sartorius, Alexander
    Groezinger, Michael
    FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE PSYCHIATRIE, 2018, 86 (11) : 680 - 689