Least modification principle for case-based reasoning: a software project planning experience

被引:13
|
作者
Lee, JK
Lee, N
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Management Sci, Seoul 130012, South Korea
[2] Agcy Def Dev, Seoul 138600, South Korea
关键词
software project planning; least modification principle; modification effort estimatiom; case based reasoning; project management;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.021
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A software project plan is composed of stages of activities and detailed tasks to be performed, and precedence restrictions among them. A project network is very complex and its construction requires a vast amount of field knowledge and experience. To assist the construction of a software project network, we adopt the case-based reasoning approach. However, the software project network may be designed differently depending upon the adopted development methodology and the style of the manager, so full automation of adjusting a past case is almost impossible. Thus, reducing the modification effort to a minimum is very important for enhancing the project planner's performance. In this research, we develop the framework of the Least Modification Principle (LMP) for Case-based Reasoning to solve this kind of problem. LMP is applicable when a reliable estimation of modification effort is possible. To apply the LMP for project network planning, we have selected 17 factors and the values for each factor to specify software projects. The modification effort is estimated based on the syntactic structure of modification rules. The performance of LMP is demonstrated with each of 31 test cases based on the other 30 past cases. We found that the LMP approach can significantly outperform the Ordinary Factor Matching approach. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 202
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving the tutoring of software design using case-based reasoning
    Thomasson, B. J.
    Ratcliffe, M. B.
    Thomas, L. A.
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2006, 20 (04) : 351 - 362
  • [32] An empirical study of predicting software faults with case-based reasoning
    Khoshgoftaar, Taghi M.
    Seliya, Naeem
    Sundaresh, Nandini
    SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2006, 14 (02) : 85 - 111
  • [33] A case-based reasoning system to support the global software development
    Rocha, Rodrigo G. C.
    Azevedo, Ryan R.
    Sousa, Ygor Cesar
    Tavares, Eduardo de A.
    Meira, Silvio
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS 18TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE, KES-2014, 2014, 35 : 194 - 202
  • [34] Case-based reasoning and improved adaptive search for project scheduling
    Schirmer, A
    NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 2000, 47 (03) : 201 - 222
  • [35] CASE-BASED REASONING
    EHRENBERG, D
    PETERSOHN, H
    WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, 1994, 36 (02): : 166 - 168
  • [36] CASE-BASED REASONING
    LEHNERT, W
    AI MAGAZINE, 1990, 11 (03) : 29 - 29
  • [37] CASE-BASED REASONING
    LEAKE, DB
    KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 1994, 9 (01): : 61 - 64
  • [38] Case-Based Reasoning
    Aha, DW
    AI MAGAZINE, 1995, 17 (01) : 92 - 92
  • [39] Case-based reasoning: A planning tool for intelligent transportation systems
    Khattak, A
    Kanafani, A
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 1996, 4 (05) : 267 - 288
  • [40] Extended object model for case-based reasoning in process planning
    Xu, Zhi-Wei
    Liu, Wen-Jian
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2002, 8 (02): : 115 - 121