Can we afford prostate permanent seed brachytherapy as monotherapy in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer patients?

被引:0
|
作者
Cormier, Luc [1 ]
Crehange, Gilles [2 ]
机构
[1] CHU Dijon, Serv Urol, F-21079 Dijon, France
[2] Ctr Georges Francois Leclerc, Serv Radiotherapie, F-21079 Dijon, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2013年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Brachytherapy; Radiotherapy; Gleason score; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; INTERMEDIATE-RISK; DOSE-RESPONSE; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; I-125; RADIOTHERAPY; PATTERNS; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fpurol.2012.11.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
After permanent prostate seed implant (PPI) as a monotherapy, biochemical failure may occur in 20% to 30% of low or intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. These rates are very similar to the rates of biochemical failures observed with surgery or external radiotherapy with respect to each prognostic group. It should be noted that the rates of pure intraprostatic failures remain lower. The review of the literature shows that PPI is allowed for Gleason 7 cancers in patients with favorable intermediate-risk with respect to an accurate selection of patients. Indeed, the latest recommendations from the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) are in keeping with such assumption and ABS allows PPI for intermediate-risk patients. However, it is not recommended to use PPI as a monotherapy in patients with several intermediate-risk prognostic factors (Gleason score 7 (3 + 4) or clinical T2b or a PSA value between 10 and 20 ng/mL). (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:F12 / F18
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Results of a Surgically Derived Nomogram to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading Applied to a Cohort of Patients With "Favorable-risk" Prostate Cancer Treated With Permanent Seed Brachytherapy REPLY
    Crook, Juanita
    Bowes, David
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : 654 - 655
  • [22] The impact of primary Gleason grade on biochemical outcome following brachytherapy for hormone-naive Gleason score 7 prostate cancer
    Merrick, GS
    Butler, WM
    Wallner, KE
    Galbreath, RW
    Allen, ZA
    Adamovich, E
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (03): : 234 - 240
  • [23] Prostate Specific Antigen Level and Gleason Score in Indonesian Prostate Cancer Patients
    Herawan, Muhammad Imam Al Kautsar
    Adriansjah, Ricky
    MAJALAH KEDOKTERAN BANDUNG, 2024, 56 (03): : 209 - 213
  • [24] Prostate cancer: Brachytherapy monotherapy is efficacious
    Thoma C.
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2017, 14 (12) : 700 - 700
  • [25] Use of a surgically derived nomogram to predict high likelihood of Gleason score upgrading for favorable-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent seed brachytherapy
    Bowes, D.
    Crook, J. M.
    Wallace, K.
    Evans, A.
    Toi, A.
    Finelli, A.
    Jewett, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (07)
  • [26] Biochemical outcome for hormone-naive patients with Gleason score 3+4 versus 4+3 prostate cancer undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy
    Merrick, GS
    Butler, WM
    Galbreath, RW
    Lief, JH
    Adamovich, E
    UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (01) : 98 - 103
  • [27] Developing a model for forecasting Gleason score ≥7 in potential prostate cancer patients to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies
    Xiao Li
    Yongsheng Pan
    Yuan Huang
    Jun Wang
    Cheng Zhang
    Jie Wu
    Gong Cheng
    Chao Qin
    Lixin Hua
    Zengjun Wang
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2016, 48 : 535 - 540
  • [28] Long-term prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: Impact on prostate cancer specific survival
    Tollefson, MK
    Leibovich, BC
    Slezak, JM
    Zincke, H
    Blute, ML
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (02): : 547 - 551
  • [29] Upgrading prostate cancer patients with a Gleason score of 7 and tertiary grade 5 is warranted
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2008, 5 (2): : 62 - 62
  • [30] Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer with Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy
    Moran, B.
    Tack, K.
    Keyes, K.
    Banghart, K.
    Braccioforte, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)