Interferon-gamma release assays for the tuberculosis serial testing of health care workers: a systematic review

被引:67
|
作者
Ringshausen, Felix C. [1 ]
Schablon, Anja [2 ]
Nienhaus, Albert [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Resp Med, Hannover, Germany
[2] Hamburg Eppendorf Univ Hosp, Inst Hlth Serv Res Dermatol & Nursing, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Inst Statutory Accid Insurance & Prevent Hlth & W, Dept Occupat Hlth Res, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Interferon-gamma release assay; Health care workers; Latent tuberculosis infection; Occupational disease; Serial testing; Tuberculosis; Within-subject variability; WITHIN-SUBJECT VARIABILITY; LATENT TUBERCULOSIS; GOLD TEST; OCCUPATIONAL RISK; INFECTION; RESPONSES; REPRODUCIBILITY; TRANSMISSION; CONVERSIONS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6673-7-6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are increasingly used in the tuberculosis (TB) screening of health care workers (HCWs). However, comparatively high rates of conversions and reversion as well as growing evidence of substantial within-subject variability of interferon-gamma responses complicate their interpretation in the serial testing of HCWs. Methods: We conducted a systematic review on the repeat use of the two commercial IGRAs, the QuantiFERON-TB Gold or In-Tube version (QFT) and the T-SPOT. TB (T-SPOT), in the serial testing and its with-subject variability among HCWs in order to provide guidance on how to interpret serial testing results in the context of the periodic screening of subjects with an increased occupational risk of latent TB infection (LTBI) in countries with low and intermediate TB incidence rates. The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched without restrictions. Retrieved articles were complemented by additional hand searched records. Only studies that used commercial IGRAs among HCWs apart from contact and outbreak investigations and those fulfilling further predefined criteria were included. Results: Overall, 20 studies, five using the T-SPOT and 19 using the QFT assay, were included. Fifteen studies met eligibility criteria for serial testing and five studies for within-subject variability. Irrespective of TB incidence rates in the study's country of origin, reversion rates were consistently higher than conversion rates (range 22-71% vs. 1-14%). Subjects with baseline results around the diagnostic threshold were more likely to show inconsistent results on retesting. The within-subject variability of interferon-gamma responses was considerable across all studies systematically assessing it. Conclusions: On the basis of reviewed studies we advocate using a borderline zone from 0.2-0.7 IU/ml for the interpretation of repeat QFT results in the routine screening of HCWs with an increased LTBI risk. Subjects with QFT results within this borderline zone, with suspected fresh infection, and those who are considered for preventive chemotherapy should be retested with the QFT within a period of about four weeks before preventive chemotherapy is recommended. However, the available data regarding the use of the T-SPOT in the serial testing of HCWs is remarkably limited and warrants further research.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interferon-gamma release assays and the diagnosis of tuberculosis: have they found their place?
    Darby, J.
    Black, J.
    Buising, K.
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2014, 44 (07) : 624 - 632
  • [42] EFFECTIVE TUBERCULOSIS CONTACT INVESTIGATION USING INTERFERON-GAMMA RELEASE ASSAYS
    Bennet, Rutger
    Nejat, Sahar
    Eriksson, Margareta
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2019, 38 (04) : E76 - E78
  • [43] Comparison of Two Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Pediatric Tuberculosis Infection
    Gaensbauer, James T.
    Reves, Randall R.
    Katz, Dolly
    Ahmed, Amina
    Venkatappa, Thara
    TB Epidemiol Studies Consortium
    JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [44] Diagnostic Value of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Tuberculosis in the Immunocompromised Population
    Yang, Ying
    Wang, Hong-Jiao
    Hu, Wei-Lin
    Bai, Guan-Nan
    Hua, Chun-Zhen
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [45] Can pleural tuberculosis be diagnosed using interferon-gamma release assays?
    Joshi, Rajnish
    Madhukar, Pai
    RESPIRATION, 2008, 76 (02) : 128 - 130
  • [46] The sensitivity of interferon-gamma release assays is not compromised in tuberculosis patients with diabetes
    Walsh, M. C.
    Camerlin, A. J.
    Miles, R.
    Pino, P.
    Martinez, P.
    Mora-Guzman, F.
    Crespo-Solis, J. G.
    Fisher-Hoch, S. P.
    McCormick, J. B.
    Restrepo, B. I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2011, 15 (02) : 179 - 184
  • [47] Importance of the use of interferon-gamma release assays in the epidemiological surveillance of tuberculosis
    Castaneda-Hernandez, Diana M.
    Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J.
    Carlos Sepulveda-Arias, Juan
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2012, 140 (01) : 128 - 129
  • [48] Comparison of Interferon-gamma Release Assays and the Tuberculin Skin Test for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Systematic Review
    Overton, Kristen
    Varma, Rick
    Post, Jeffrey J.
    TUBERCULOSIS AND RESPIRATORY DISEASES, 2018, 81 (01) : 59 - 72
  • [49] Evaluation of the Impact of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays on the Management of Childhood Tuberculosis
    Ling, Daphne I.
    Crepeau, Claire A.
    Dufresne, Marieke
    Khan, Shazia
    Quach, Caroline
    Dendukuri, Nandini
    Schwartzman, Kevin
    Menzies, Dick
    Lands, Larry C.
    Pai, Madhukar
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2012, 31 (12) : 1258 - 1262
  • [50] A comparison of interferon-gamma release assays and diagnostic algorithms for latent tuberculosis
    Berry, M. P. R.
    Wickremasinghe, M. I. Y.
    Merritt, J.
    Pike, K.
    Wattam, S.
    Mercer, M.
    Anderson, S. R.
    Jepson, A.
    Kon, O. M.
    THORAX, 2007, 62 : A81 - A81