Determination of particle effective density in urban environments with a differential mobility analyzer and aerosol particle mass analyzer

被引:109
|
作者
Geller, Michael [1 ]
Biswas, Subhasis [1 ]
Sioutas, Constantinos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02786820600803925
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Effective densities of atmospheric aerosols in various locations of the Los Angeles Basin were determined by a DMA-APM technique. Effective density was calculated by comparing voltage distributions of sampled atmospheric aerosols with PSL particles of known density. The five sites chosen for field experiments were: (1) Interstate-710 Freeway, impacted by heavy-duty diesel vehicles; (2) State Route CA-110, open only to gasoline vehicles; (3) Riverside, a receptor site known for secondary particle formation; (4) University of Southern California, a typical urban and industrial environment; (5) Coast for marine aerosol. The size range selected for this study was from 50 nm to 414 nm. While 50 nm particles exhibited a single effective density multiple effective densities were measured for each of the other particle sizes as significant fractions of these particles are transported from background sources. Regardless of location, 322-414 nm particle effective densities were considerably lower than unity. The lowest effective densities (approximate to 0.1 g cm(-3)) were reported for I-710, confirming that diesel combustion aerosols are rich in chain agglomerates with large void spaces. Riverside exhibited high effective densities (approximate to 1.2-1.5 g cm(-3)) for 50-202 nm particles, which we hypothesize is due to transformations that occur during advection from Los Angeles. Measurements of diurnal variation of effective density at Riverside support this hypothesis. Overall, our results suggest that effective density declines as the particle mobility diameter increases irrespective of location. Fractal dimensions calculated from average effective densities were lowest for I-710 (D-f = 2.41) and CA-110 (D-f = 2.54) aerosols, presumably due to the influence of vehicular combustion emission on these sites. By contrast, average fractal dimensions at USC, Riverside and Coast were found to be 2.79, 2.83, and 2.92, respectively. High fractal dimensions at these sites may be the effects of aging, moisture absorption and/or organic vapor condensation on the particles, which fills void space and makes particles more spherical.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 723
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Practical limitations of aerosol separation by a tandem differential mobility analyzer-aerosol particle mass analyzer
    Radney, James G.
    Zangmeister, Christopher D.
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (02) : 160 - 172
  • [2] Determination of particle mass, effective density, mass-mobility exponent, and dynamic shape factor using an aerodynamic aerosol classifier and a differential mobility analyzer in tandem
    Tavakoli, Farzan
    Olfert, Jason S.
    Journal of Aerosol Science, 2014, 75 : 35 - 42
  • [3] Determination of particle mass, effective density, mass-mobility exponent, and dynamic shape factor using an aerodynamic aerosol classifier and a differential mobility analyzer in tandem
    Tavakoli, Farzan
    Olfert, Jason S.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2014, 75 : 35 - 42
  • [4] Particle Classification by the Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer-Particle Mass Analyzer System
    Kuwata, Mikinori
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (07) : 508 - 520
  • [5] Online Nanoparticle Mass Measurement by Combined Aerosol Particle Mass Analyzer and Differential Mobility Analyzer: Comparison of Theory and Measurements
    Lall, Anshuman Amit
    Ma, Xiaofei
    Guha, Suvajyoti
    Mulholland, George W.
    Zachariah, Michael R.
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (11) : 1075 - 1083
  • [6] Real-Time Aerosol Density Determination Utilizing a Modified Scanning Mobility Particle SizerAerosol Particle Mass Analyzer System
    Malloy, Quentin G. J.
    Nakao, Shunsuke
    Qi, Li
    Austin, Rebecca
    Stothers, Clayton
    Hagino, Hiroyuki
    Cocker, David R., III
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (07) : 673 - 678
  • [7] Determination of Aerosol Particle Size Distribution using Electrical Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA)
    Fasih-Ramandi, Fatemeh
    Sadigzadeh, Asghar
    Jafari, Mohammad-Javad
    Khodakarim, Soheila
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK, 2021, 11 (01) : 92 - 105
  • [8] Differential mobility analyzer for nano particle sizing
    Fissan, H
    Hummes, D
    Pui, D
    SYNTHESIS AND PROCESSING OF NANOCRYSTALLINE POWDER, 1996, : 289 - 297
  • [9] On the radial flow differential mobility analyzers for the determination of aerosol particle density and mass
    Boulaud, D.
    Pourprix, M.
    Gougeon, R.
    Le Bronec, E.
    Renoux, A.
    Journal of Aerosol Science, 1996, 27 (Suppl 1):
  • [10] Mass-Mobility Measurements Using a Centrifugal Particle Mass Analyzer and Differential Mobility Spectrometer
    Johnson, Tyler J.
    Symonds, Jonathan P. R.
    Olfert, Jason S.
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (11) : 1215 - 1225