Concordance of confirmatory prostate biopsy in active surveillance with national guidelines: An analysis from the multi-institutional PURC cohort

被引:1
|
作者
Talwar, Ruchika [1 ,2 ]
Friel, Brian [1 ]
Mittal, Sameer [1 ]
Xia, Leilei [1 ]
Fonshell, Claudette [3 ]
Danella, John [4 ]
Jacobs, Bruce [5 ]
Lanchoney, Thomas [6 ]
Raman, Jay [7 ]
Tomaszewski, Jeffrey [8 ]
Trabulsi, Edouard [9 ]
Reese, Adam [10 ]
Singer, Eric A. [11 ]
Ginzburg, Serge [12 ]
Smaldone, Marc [13 ]
Uzzo, Robert [13 ]
Mucksavage, Phillip [1 ]
Guzzo, Thomas J. [1 ]
Lee, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Div Urol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Hlth Care Improvement Fdn, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Danville, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Urol Hlth Specialists, Hershey, PA USA
[7] Penn State Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Div Urol, Hershey, PA USA
[8] Cooper Univ, Div Urol, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Camden, NJ USA
[9] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Urol, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA USA
[10] Temple Univ, Dept Urol, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[11] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Sect Urol Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[12] Einstein Healthcare Network, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[13] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Div Urol, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Quality improvement; Active surveillance; Prostate cancer; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend confirmatory biopsy within 12 months of active surveillance (AS) enrollment. With <10 cores on initial biopsy, re-biopsy should occur within 6 months. Our objective was to determine if patients on AS within practices in the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC) receive guideline concordant confirmatory biopsies. Materials and Methods: Within PURC, a prospective collaborative of diverse urology practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, we identified men enrolled in AS after first biopsy, analyzing time to re-biopsy and factors associated with various intervals of re-biopsy. Results: In total, 1,047 patients were enrolled in AS for a minimum of 12 months after initial biopsy. Four hundred seventy-seven (45%) underwent second biopsy at 1 of the 9 PURC practices. The number of patients undergoing re-biopsy within 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 12 to 18 months, and > 18 months was 71 (14%), 218 (45.7%), 134 (28%), and 54 (11%), respectively. Sixty percent underwent confirmatory biopsy within 12 months. On multivariate analysis, re-biopsy interval was associated with number of positive cores, perineural invasion, and practice ID (all P < 0.05). Adjusted multivariable regression did not identify factors predictive of re-biopsy interval. Conclusion: Of patients who underwent confirmatory biopsy at PURC practices, 60.5% were within 12 months per NCCN guidelines. This suggests area for improvement in guideline adherence after enrollment in AS. All practices that offer AS should periodically perform similar analyses to monitor their performance. In an era of value-based care, adherence to guideline based active surveillance practices may eventually comprise national quality metrics affecting provider reimbursement. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:846.e17 / 846.e22
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Potential Impact of Gleason Grade Reproducibility on Active Surveillance Management in Prostate Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study of Patients Enrolled in a Prospective Active Surveillance Study (PASS)
    McKenney, J. K.
    Simko, J.
    Bonham, M.
    True, L. D.
    Hawley, S.
    Newcomb, L.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 24 : 210A - 210A
  • [32] Potential Impact of Gleason Grade Reproducibility on Active Surveillance Management in Prostate Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study of Patients Enrolled in a Prospective Active Surveillance Study (PASS).
    McKenney, J. K.
    Simko, J.
    Bonham, M.
    True, L. D.
    Hawley, S.
    Newcomb, L.
    Carroll, P. R.
    Brooks, J. D.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 210A - 210A
  • [33] Can we expand active surveillance criteria to include biopsy Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer? A multi-institutional study of 2,323 patients
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Briganti, Alberto
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Surcel, Christian I.
    Salomon, Laurent
    Freschi, Massimo
    Mirvald, Cristian
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Jenkins, Anna
    Ost, Piet
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (02) : 71.e1 - 71.e9
  • [34] SBRT for lymph node metastases from prostate cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis
    Alongi, F.
    Nicosia, L.
    Francese, C.
    D'Agostino, G.
    Di Brina, L.
    Figlia, V.
    Mazzola, R.
    Tomatis, S.
    Scorsetti, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S842 - S842
  • [35] SBRT FOR LYMPH NODE METASTASES FROM PROSTATE CANCER: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
    Alongi, Filippo
    Franzese, Ciro
    Nicosia, Luca
    D'agostino, Giuseppe
    Di Brina, Lucia
    Figlia, Vanessa
    Mazzola, Rosario
    Rigo, Michele
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Scorsetti, Marta
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (03) : 1524 - 1524
  • [36] The Potential Impact of Reproducibility of Gleason Grading in Men With Early Stage Prostate Cancer Managed by Active Surveillance: A Multi-Institutional Study
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Simko, Jeff
    Bonham, Michael
    True, Lawrence D.
    Troyer, Dean
    Hawley, Sarah
    Newcomb, Lisa F.
    Fazli, Ladan
    Kunju, Lakshmi P.
    Nicolas, Marlo M.
    Vakar-Lopez, Funda
    Zhang, Xiaotun
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Brooks, James D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02): : 465 - 469
  • [37] MRI-GUIDED ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IN PATIENTS WITH ISUP 1 PROSTATE CANCERdA MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL VALIDATION OF THE DISCRIMINATION OF THE PRECISE SCORE
    Sushentsev, Nikita
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Dixius, Martin
    Kastner, Christof
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Platzek, Ivan
    Thomas, Christian
    Kesch, Claudia
    Umutlu, Lale
    Reis, Henning
    Rau, Tilmann
    Lenders, Lotte
    Spahn, Martin
    Boschheidgen, Matthias
    Antoch, Gerald
    Albers, Peter
    Barrett, Tristan
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E547 - E547
  • [38] ESTABLISHING THE BEST THRESHOLD FOR BIOPSY IN MPMRI NEGATIVE OR INDETERMINATE USING DATA FROM A LARGE MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL COHORT OF MEN UNDERGOING MPMRI, 4KSCORE AND PROSTATE BIOPSY
    de Almeida e Silva, Ricardo, Jr.
    Atluri, Venkatasai S.
    Reis, Isildinha M.
    Kwon, Deukwoo
    Soodana-Prakash, Nachiketh
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    Patel, Vipul
    Wagaskar, Vinayak
    Konety, Badrinth
    Kasraeian, Ali
    Czarniecki, Stefan
    Thoreson, Greg
    Kim, Eric
    Nahar, Bruno
    Gonzalgo, Mark
    Ritch, Chad
    Merhe, Ali
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Punnen, Sanoj
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E855 - E855
  • [39] Do incidental prostate cancer patients managed with active surveillance exhibit different disease features and outcomes compared to their biopsy-diagnosed counterparts? Results of a multi-institutional study
    Leni, R.
    Stabile, A.
    Capitanio, U.
    Roscigno, M.
    La Croce, G.
    Da Pozzo, L. F.
    Olivier, J.
    Zattoni, F.
    Facco, M.
    Dal Moro, F.
    Van den Bergh, R.
    Soeterik, T.
    Bianchi, L.
    Lampariello, L.
    Salonia, A.
    Montorsi, F.
    Briganti, A.
    Vickers, A.
    Gandaglia, G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S342 - S343
  • [40] What is the optimal definition of misclassification in patients with very low-risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance? Results from a multi-institutional series
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Suardi, Nazareno
    De Visschere, Peter J. L.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Ghadjar, Pirus
    Massard, Christophe
    Ost, Piet
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Surcel, Christian I.
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Briganti, Alberto
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (04) : 164.e1 - 164.e9