Concordance of confirmatory prostate biopsy in active surveillance with national guidelines: An analysis from the multi-institutional PURC cohort

被引:1
|
作者
Talwar, Ruchika [1 ,2 ]
Friel, Brian [1 ]
Mittal, Sameer [1 ]
Xia, Leilei [1 ]
Fonshell, Claudette [3 ]
Danella, John [4 ]
Jacobs, Bruce [5 ]
Lanchoney, Thomas [6 ]
Raman, Jay [7 ]
Tomaszewski, Jeffrey [8 ]
Trabulsi, Edouard [9 ]
Reese, Adam [10 ]
Singer, Eric A. [11 ]
Ginzburg, Serge [12 ]
Smaldone, Marc [13 ]
Uzzo, Robert [13 ]
Mucksavage, Phillip [1 ]
Guzzo, Thomas J. [1 ]
Lee, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Div Urol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Hlth Care Improvement Fdn, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Danville, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Urol Hlth Specialists, Hershey, PA USA
[7] Penn State Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Div Urol, Hershey, PA USA
[8] Cooper Univ, Div Urol, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Camden, NJ USA
[9] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Urol, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA USA
[10] Temple Univ, Dept Urol, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[11] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Sect Urol Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[12] Einstein Healthcare Network, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[13] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Div Urol, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Quality improvement; Active surveillance; Prostate cancer; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend confirmatory biopsy within 12 months of active surveillance (AS) enrollment. With <10 cores on initial biopsy, re-biopsy should occur within 6 months. Our objective was to determine if patients on AS within practices in the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC) receive guideline concordant confirmatory biopsies. Materials and Methods: Within PURC, a prospective collaborative of diverse urology practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, we identified men enrolled in AS after first biopsy, analyzing time to re-biopsy and factors associated with various intervals of re-biopsy. Results: In total, 1,047 patients were enrolled in AS for a minimum of 12 months after initial biopsy. Four hundred seventy-seven (45%) underwent second biopsy at 1 of the 9 PURC practices. The number of patients undergoing re-biopsy within 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 12 to 18 months, and > 18 months was 71 (14%), 218 (45.7%), 134 (28%), and 54 (11%), respectively. Sixty percent underwent confirmatory biopsy within 12 months. On multivariate analysis, re-biopsy interval was associated with number of positive cores, perineural invasion, and practice ID (all P < 0.05). Adjusted multivariable regression did not identify factors predictive of re-biopsy interval. Conclusion: Of patients who underwent confirmatory biopsy at PURC practices, 60.5% were within 12 months per NCCN guidelines. This suggests area for improvement in guideline adherence after enrollment in AS. All practices that offer AS should periodically perform similar analyses to monitor their performance. In an era of value-based care, adherence to guideline based active surveillance practices may eventually comprise national quality metrics affecting provider reimbursement. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:846.e17 / 846.e22
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARING MRI/US FUSION TO STANDARD PROSTATE BIOPSY IN DETERMINING GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AT CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY IN A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE COHORT: A PENNSYLVANIA UROLOGY REGIONAL COLLABORATIVE (PURC) ANALYSIS
    Strauss, David
    Reddy, Rohit
    Loecher, Matthew
    Syed, Kaynaat
    Danella, John
    Ginzburg, Serge
    Belkoff, Laurence
    Tomaszewski, Jeffrey
    Trabulsi, Edouard
    Singer, Eric
    Jacobs, Bruce
    Raman, Jay
    Guzzo, Thomas
    Uzzo, Robert
    Reese, Adam
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E742 - E743
  • [2] MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION OF MRI AND FUSION BIOPSY IN CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Russell, Christopher M.
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Lee, Matthew
    Tomlins, Scott A.
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    Ellimoottil, Chandy S.
    Wei, Jont T.
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Curci, Nicole
    Frye, Thomas P.
    Truong, Matthew
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir
    Shah, Paras
    Patel, Vinay
    George, Arvin
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E95 - E96
  • [3] RACIAL DISPARITIES IN RATES OF GLEASON GRADE RECLASSIFICATION IN A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL PROSTATE CANCER ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE COHORT: A PENNSYLVANIA UROLOGY REGIONAL COLLABORATIVE (PURC) ANALYSIS
    Reddy, Rohit
    Strauss, David
    Loecher, Matthew
    Syed, Kaynaat
    Danella, John
    Ginzburg, Serge
    Belkoff, Laurence
    Tomaszewski, Jeffrey
    Trabulsi, Edouard
    Singer, Eric A.
    Jacobs, Bruce L.
    Raman, Jay
    Guzzo, Thomas
    Uzzo, Robert
    Reese, Adam C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E747 - E748
  • [4] CANARY PROSTATE ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE STUDY (PASS); A DESIGN OF A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE COHORT
    Fazli, Ladan
    Newcomb, Lisa F.
    Brooks, James D.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Feng, Ziding
    Gleave, Martin E.
    Nelson, Peter S.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Hawley, Sarah
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Troyer, Dean
    Simko, M. D. Jeff
    True, Lawrence D.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 : A46 - A46
  • [5] Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study: Design of a Multi-institutional Active Surveillance Cohort and Biorepository
    Newcomb, Lisa F.
    Brooks, James D.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Feng, Ziding
    Gleave, Martin E.
    Nelson, Peter S.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (02) : 407 - 413
  • [6] A multi-institutional cohort of active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer
    Eggener, S.
    Berglund, R.
    Mueller, A.
    Ayyathurrai, R.
    Soloway, M.
    Abouassaly, R.
    Jones, S.
    Klein, E.
    Zippavigna, C.
    Goldenberg, L.
    Eastham, J.
    Scardino, P.
    Guillonneau, B.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 235 - 235
  • [7] A multi-institutional cohort of active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Mueller, Alexander
    Berglund, Ryan K.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Zappavigna, Chris
    Soloway, Cindy T.
    Soloway, Mark S.
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Klein, Eric A.
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Guillonneau, Bertrand D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 64 - 64
  • [8] Factors Associated with Time to Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment for Prostate Cancer in a Multi-Institutional Cohort
    Cooley, Lauren Folgosa
    Emeka, Adaeze A.
    Meyers, Travis J.
    Cooper, Phillip R.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Finelli, Antonio
    Eastham, James A.
    Logothetis, Christopher J.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Vesprini, Danny
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Higano, Celestia S.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Chan, June M.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Loeb, Stacy
    Helfand, Brian T.
    Scholtens, Denise M.
    Witte, John S.
    Catalona, William J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (05): : 1148 - 1155
  • [9] TRANSPERINEAL TEMPLATE-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY IN PATIENTS INITIATING ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISON
    Pham, Khanh
    Odem-Davis, Katherine
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Porter, Christopher
    Wei, John
    Morgan, Todd
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E122 - E122
  • [10] A Multi-institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Mueller, Alex
    Berglund, Ryan K.
    Ayyathurai, Raj
    Soloway, Cindy
    Soloway, Mark S.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Klein, Eric A.
    Jones, Steven J.
    Zappavigna, Chris
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 1635 - 1641