Morning is tomorrow, evening is today: relationships between chronotype and time perspective

被引:63
|
作者
Stolarski, Maciej [1 ]
Ledzinska, Maria [1 ]
Matthews, Gerald [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Psychol, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Psychol, Cincinnati, CA USA
关键词
morningness; eveningness; MEQ; time perspective; ZTPI; personality; CIRCADIAN TYPOLOGY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SOCIOECONOMIC-FACTORS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SENSATION SEEKING; PERSONALITY; SLEEP; TEMPERAMENT; IMPULSIVITY; PREDICTOR;
D O I
10.1080/09291016.2012.656248
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The present study explores the relationship between MorningnessEveningness and five personality dimensions for Time Perspective (TP), representing psychological attitudes toward time. Although these constructs are related to different time horizons (i.e., daytime vs. life-time horizon), existing empirical data regarding their personality and behavioral correlates allows for the prediction that some of the TP dimensions are significantly related to diurnal preference. A sample of 309 university students (30.1% male) aged between 19 and 26 completed the Polish adaptation of the morningnesseveningness questionnaire (MEQ) and the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). Our research confirmed the main hypotheses, that Morningness is positively related to Future TP, whereas Eveningness correlates positively with Present-Hedonistic TP. Moreover, chronotype proved to be significantly related to other TP scales, as well as to the Deviation from Balanced Time Perspective (DBTP) coefficient, an indicator of a balanced time perspective, showing that Morning-types generally tend to express a more adaptive attitude toward psychological time. The possible mechanisms of the relationship, as well as implications for practice and theory are discussed in respect to the obtained data. The paper contributes to the knowledge about the relationship between circadian typology and personality in young adults.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 196
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MEASUREMENT OF TIME, YESTERDAY, TODAY, TOMORROW
    PETER, M
    ARCHIVES DES SCIENCES, 1978, : 91 - 97
  • [22] Snacking behavior differs between evening and morning chronotype individuals but no differences are observed in overall energy intake, diet quality, or food cravings
    Yang, Chia-Lun
    Tucker, Robin M.
    CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 39 (05) : 616 - 625
  • [23] Chronotype, social jetlag, and time perspective
    Borisenkov, Mikhail F.
    Vetosheva, Valentina, I
    Kuznetsova, Yekaterina S.
    Khodyrev, Grigoriy N.
    Shikhova, Asya, V
    Popov, Sergey, V
    Pecherkina, Anna A.
    Dorogina, Olga, I
    Symaniuk, Elvira E.
    CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 36 (12) : 1772 - 1781
  • [24] Best time for administration of antihypertensive medications: morning or evening?
    Salah, Husam M.
    Mehta, Jawahar L.
    LANCET, 2022, 400 (10361): : 1383 - 1385
  • [25] Relationships between the Munich Chronotype questionnaire index and time at minimum core temperature
    Hoshikawa, Masako
    BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM RESEARCH, 2022, 53 (11) : 1782 - 1789
  • [26] CIRCADIAN PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MORNING AND EVENING TYPES
    HORNE, JA
    BRASS, CG
    PETTITT, AN
    ERGONOMICS, 1980, 23 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [27] A future-minded lark in the morning: The influence of time-of-day and chronotype on metaphorical associations between space and time
    Li, Heng
    METAPHOR AND SYMBOL, 2018, 33 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [28] The Mediating Role of Time Perspective in the Relationship between Chronotype and Suicide in Bipolar Disorder
    Karaytug, Mahmut Onur
    Tamam, Lut
    Demirkol, Mehmet Emin
    Namli, Zeynep
    Gurbuz, Mahmut
    Yesiloglu, Caner
    Davut, Ozge Eris
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [29] Defining dietetics practice for today and tomorrow: An international perspective
    Shronts, EP
    NUTRITION, 1996, 12 (02) : 141 - 142
  • [30] Smoking Today and Stopping Tomorrow: a Limited Foresight Perspective
    Jehiel, Philippe
    Lilico, Andrew
    CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2010, 56 (02) : 141 - 164