Analysis of ultrasonically rotating droplet using moving particle semi-implicit and distributed point source methods

被引:6
|
作者
Wada, Yuji [1 ]
Yuge, Kohei [1 ]
Tanaka, Hiroki [2 ]
Nakamura, Kentaro [2 ]
机构
[1] Seikei Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Musashino, Tokyo 1808633, Japan
[2] Tokyo Inst Technol, Precis & Intelligence Lab, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2268503, Japan
关键词
ACOUSTIC RADIATION PRESSURE; INTENSE SOUND FIELDS; NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; VISCOUS-FLUID; SMALL OBJECTS; LIQUID-DROPS; RIGID SPHERE; TORQUE; DRIVEN; WAVES;
D O I
10.7567/JJAP.55.07KE06
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Numerical analysis of the rotation of an ultrasonically levitated droplet with a free surface boundary is discussed. The ultrasonically levitated droplet is often reported to rotate owing to the surface tangential component of acoustic radiation force. To observe the torque from an acoustic wave and clarify the mechanism underlying the phenomena, it is effective to take advantage of numerical simulation using the distributed point source method (DPSM) and moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) method, both of which do not require a calculation grid or mesh. In this paper, the numerical treatment of the viscoacoustic torque, which emerges from the viscous boundary layer and governs the acoustical droplet rotation, is discussed. The Reynolds stress traction force is calculated from the DPSM result using the idea of effective normal particle velocity through the boundary layer and input to the MPS surface particles. A droplet levitated in an acoustic chamber is simulated using the proposed calculation method. The droplet is vertically supported by a plane standing wave from an ultrasonic driver and subjected to a rotating sound field excited by two acoustic sources on the side wall with different phases. The rotation of the droplet is successfully reproduced numerically and its acceleration is discussed and compared with those in the literature. (C) 2016 The Japan Society of Applied Physics
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improved pressure calculation for the moving particle semi-implicit method
    Kazuya Shibata
    Issei Masaie
    Masahiro Kondo
    Kohei Murotani
    Seiichi Koshizuka
    Computational Particle Mechanics, 2015, 2 : 91 - 108
  • [32] Erratum to: Least squares moving particle semi-implicit method
    Tasuku Tamai
    Seiichi Koshizuka
    Computational Particle Mechanics, 2014, 1 : 441 - 441
  • [33] Convergence-improved source term of pressure Poisson equation for moving particle semi-implicit
    Iida, Takahito
    Yokoyama, Yudai
    APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2022, 124
  • [34] Velocity boundary models of inlet flow using moving particle semi-implicit method
    School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
    Sun, Z., 1600, Xi'an Jiaotong University (47):
  • [35] Computational haemodynamics of small vessels using the Moving Particle Semi-implicit (MPS) method
    Gambaruto, Alberto M.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2015, 302 : 68 - 96
  • [36] Difference between smoothed particle hydrodynamics and moving particle semi-implicit operators
    Imoto, Yusuke
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 395
  • [37] MODELING OF FLOW OVER AN OGEE SPILLWAY USING MOVING PARTICLE SEMI-IMPLICIT METHOD
    Fadafan, Masoud Arami
    Kermani, Masoud-Reza Hessami
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH IAHR WORLD CONGRESS: DELTAS OF THE FUTURE AND WHAT HAPPENS UPSTREAM, 2015, : 3659 - 3664
  • [38] An optimal study on a TVC evaporation tube using moving particle semi-implicit method
    Xing, Fei
    Zhang, Shuai
    Zheng, Yao
    Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2011, 32 (03): : 339 - 342
  • [39] Numerical simulation on void bubble dynamics using moving particle semi-implicit method
    Tian, Wenxi
    Ishiwatari, Yuki
    Ikejiri, Satoshi
    Yamakawa, Masanori
    Oka, Yoshiaki
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2009, 239 (11) : 2382 - 2390
  • [40] Dissolution characteristics of solutes with different shapes using the moving particle semi-implicit method
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhou, Zi-Qi
    Han, Pei-Dong
    Sun, Zhong-Guo
    Xi, Guang
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2022, 34 (11)