Initial Prostate Biopsy: Development and Internal Validation of a Biopsy-specific Nomogram Based on the Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 Assay

被引:109
|
作者
Hansen, Jens [1 ,2 ]
Auprich, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Ahyai, Sascha A. [1 ]
de la Taille, Alexandre [3 ]
van Poppel, Hendrik [4 ]
Marberger, Michael [5 ]
Stenzl, Arnulf [6 ]
Mulders, Peter F. A. [7 ]
Huland, Hartwig [2 ]
Fisch, Margit [1 ]
Abbou, Clement-Claude [3 ]
Schalken, Jack A. [7 ]
Fradet, Yves [8 ]
Marks, Leonard S. [9 ]
Ellis, William [10 ]
Partin, Alan W. [11 ]
Pummer, Karl [12 ]
Graefen, Markus [2 ]
Haese, Alexander [2 ]
Walz, Jochen [13 ]
Briganti, Alberto [14 ]
Shariat, Shahrokh F. [15 ]
Chun, Felix K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Eppendorf, Martini Clin Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Hop Henri Mondor, F-94010 Creteil, France
[4] Univ Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg, Louvain, Belgium
[5] Univ Vienna, Vienna, Austria
[6] Uniklinikum Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[8] Univ Laval, Dept Urol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[9] Urol Sci Res Fdn, Culver City, CA USA
[10] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[11] Johns Hopkins Univ Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD USA
[12] Med Univ Graz, Dept Urol, Graz, Austria
[13] Inst Paoli Calmettes Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Marseille, France
[14] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[15] Cornell Univ, Dept Urol, Weill Med Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Biomarker; Decision curve analysis; Nomogram; Initial prostate biopsy; Internal validation; Prostate cancer; Prostate cancer antigen 3; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; MOLECULAR URINE ASSAY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; PCA3; PREDICTION; DIAGNOSIS; RISK; MEN; MODELS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) assay in combination with established clinical risk factors improves the identification of men at risk of harboring prostate cancer (PCa) at initial biopsy (IBX). Objective: To develop and validate internally the first IBX-specific PCA3-based nomogram that allows an individual assessment of a man's risk of harboring any PCa and high-grade PCa (HGPCa). Design, setting, and participants: Clinical and biopsy data including urinary PCA3 score of 692 referred IBX men at risk of PCa were collected within two prospective multi-institutional studies. Intervention: IBX (>= 10 biopsy cores) with standard risk factor assessment including prebiopsy urinary PCA3 measurement. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: PCA3 assay cut-off thresholds were investigated. Regression coefficients of logistic risk factor analyses were used to construct specific sets of PCA3-based nomograms to predict any PCa and HGPCa at IBX. Accuracy estimates for the presence of any PCa and HGPCa were quantified using area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic analysis and compared with a clinical model. Bootstrap resamples were used for internal validation. Decision curve analyses quantified the clinical net benefit related to the novel PCA3-based IBX nomogram versus the clinical model. Results and limitations: Any PCa and HGPCa were diagnosed in 46% (n = 318) and 20% (n = 137), respectively. Age, prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, prostate volume, and PCA3 were independent predictors of PCa at IBX (all p < 0.001). The PCA3-based IBX nomograms significantly outperformed the clinical models without PCA3 (all p < 0.001). Accuracy was increased by 4.5-7.1% related to PCA3 inclusion. When applying nomogram-derived PCa probability thresholds <= 30%, only a few patients with HGPCa (<= 2%) will be missed while avoiding up to 55% of unnecessary biopsies. External validation of the PCA3-based IBX-specific nomogram is warranted. Conclusions: The internally validated PCA3-based IBX-specific nomogram outperforms a clinical prediction model without PCA3 for the prediction of any PCa, leading to the avoidance of unnecessary biopsies while missing only a few cases of HGPCa. Our findings support the concepts of a combination of novel markers with established clinical risk factors and the superiority of decision tools that are specific to a clinical scenario. (C) 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 209
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostate-specific antigen velocity and the odds of identifying prostate cancer at biopsy
    D'Amico, AV
    Cullen, J
    Chen, YM
    McLeod, DG
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 169 - 170
  • [32] Assessment of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Kinetics in Prediction of Prostate Cancer on Prostate Biopsy
    Shinmei, S.
    Inoue, S.
    Ohkuchi, T.
    Yasukawa, A.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S282 - S282
  • [33] PCA3-BASED NOMOGRAM FOR PREDICTING PROSTATE CANCER AND HIGH GRADE CANCER ON INITIAL TRANSRECTAL GUIDED BIOPSY
    Elshafei, Ahmed
    Chevli, K. Kent
    Duff, Michael
    Walter, Peter
    Suraf, Margaret
    Moussa, Ayman S.
    Gao Tianming
    Chueh, Shih-Chieh
    Jones, J. Stephen
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E825 - E826
  • [34] PCA3-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer and high grade cancer on initial transrectal guided biopsy
    Elshafei, Ahmed
    Chevli, K. Kent
    Moussa, Ayman S.
    Kara, Onder
    Chueh, Shih-Chieh
    Walter, Peter
    Hatem, Asmaa
    Gao, Tianming
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Duff, Michael
    PROSTATE, 2015, 75 (16): : 1951 - 1957
  • [35] Is there an optimal prostate-specific antigen threshold for prostate biopsy?
    Stephan, Carsten
    Miller, Kurt
    Jung, Klaus
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2011, 11 (08) : 1215 - 1221
  • [36] PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN (PSMA)-TARGETED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Kuppermann, David
    Calais, Jeremie
    Marks, Leonard
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E599 - E599
  • [37] Prostate specific antigen velocity: Utility as an indicator for prostate biopsy
    Gallentine, ML
    Lynch, SC
    Foley, JP
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 324 - 324
  • [38] Development and Clinical Validation of an In Situ Biopsy-Based Multimarker Assay for Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer
    Blume-Jensen, Peter
    Berman, David M.
    Rimm, David L.
    Shipitsin, Michail
    Putzi, Mathew
    Nifong, Thomas P.
    Small, Clayton
    Choudhury, Sibgat
    Capela, Teresa
    Coupal, Louis
    Ernst, Christina
    Hurley, Aeron
    Kaprelyants, Alex
    Chang, Hua
    Giladi, Eldar
    Nardone, Julie
    Dunyak, James
    Loda, Massimo
    Klein, Eric A.
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Latour, Mathieu
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Kantoff, Philip
    Saad, Fred
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (11) : 2591 - 2600
  • [39] FUSION BIOPSY IMPROVES PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION IN THE FIRST SET BIOPSY: DEVELOPMENT OF A CLINICAL NOMOGRAM
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Lombardo, Riccardo
    Scarcia, Marcello
    Ferrero, Mariaconsiglia
    Papalia, Rocco
    Ludovico, Giuseppe Mario
    Sica, Angela
    Giacobbe, Alessandro
    Ordera, Marco
    Muto, Giovanni
    Gallucci, Michele
    Tubaro, Andrea
    Miulli, Ospedale F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E337 - E337
  • [40] Could Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help to Identify the Presence of Prostate Cancer Before Initial Biopsy? The Development of Nomogram Predicting the Outcomes of Prostate Biopsy in the Chinese Population
    Fang, Dong
    Zhao, Chenglin
    Ren, Da
    Yu, Wei
    Wang, Rui
    Wang, Huihui
    Li, Xuesong
    Yin, Wenshi
    Yu, Xiaoteng
    Yang, Kunlin
    Liu, Pei
    Shan, Gangzhi
    Li, Shuqing
    He, Qun
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Xin, Zhongcheng
    Zhou, Liqun
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (13) : 4284 - 4292