Attitudes towards involuntary incarceration for tuberculosis: a survey of Union members
被引:8
|
作者:
Denholm, J. T.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Int Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, France
Royal Melbourne Hosp, Victorian Infect Dis Serv, Peter Doherty Inst Infect & Immun, Parkville, Vic 3050, AustraliaInt Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, France
Denholm, J. T.
[1
,2
]
Amon, J. J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Human Rights Watch, Hlth & Human Rights Div, New York, NY USAInt Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, France
Amon, J. J.
[3
]
O'Brien, R.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Int Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, FranceInt Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, France
O'Brien, R.
[1
]
Narain, A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Int Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, FranceInt Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, France
Narain, A.
[1
]
Kim, S. J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Int Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, FranceInt Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, France
Kim, S. J.
[1
]
El Sony, A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Int Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, France
Epidemiol Lab Epi Lab, Khartoum, SudanInt Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, France
El Sony, A.
[1
,4
]
Edginton, M. E.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Int Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, FranceInt Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, France
Edginton, M. E.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Int Union TB & Lung Dis, Eth Advisory Grp, Paris, France
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Victorian Infect Dis Serv, Peter Doherty Inst Infect & Immun, Parkville, Vic 3050, Australia
[3] Human Rights Watch, Hlth & Human Rights Div, New York, NY USA
BACKGROUND: Policies involving the use of involuntary incarceration for tuberculosis (TB) are highly ethically controversial. To encourage ethical reflection within the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), the Ethics Advisory Group (EAG) surveyed members regarding their attitudes and values relating to involuntary incarceration for TB. METHODS: Members of the Union TB section were invited to respond to an anonymous web-based survey. The survey included both multiple choice questions describing a range of scenarios regarding involuntary incarceration, and free-text fields inviting respondents to provide general comments on ethical issues. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 194 participants, 33 (17%) of whom were opposed to involuntary incarceration on principle. The age and sex of the respondents was not associated with likelihood of principled opposition; respondents from North America were least likely to be opposed to involuntary incarceration (P = 0.02). Respondents were most likely to consider involuntary incarceration for persons with known multidrug-resistant TB or a history of previous treatment default, and least likely where people lived alone, were university-educated or the main income provider for their families. CONCLUSION: This survey found a wide range of viewpoints regarding involuntary incarceration, and highlights a number of key elements in ethical engagement with the tensions surrounding involuntary incarceration. We provide commentary on approaches to ethical policy making in the light of these findings.