共 50 条
Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study Comparing Patupilone (EPO906) With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Platinum-Refractory or -Resistant Patients With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
被引:96
|作者:
Colombo, Nicoletta
[1
,2
]
Kutarska, Elzbieta
[4
]
Dimopoulos, Meletios
[7
]
Bae, Duk-Soo
[8
]
Rzepka-Gorska, Izabella
[5
]
Bidzinski, Mariusz
[6
]
Scambia, Giovanni
[3
]
Engelholm, Svend Aage
[9
]
Joly, Florence
[10
]
Weber, Dirk
[11
]
El-Hashimy, Mona
[12
]
Li, Jingjin
[12
]
Souami, Farida
[11
]
Wing, Patricia
[12
]
Engelholm, Silke
[9
]
Bamias, Aristotelis
[7
]
Schwartz, Peter
[13
]
机构:
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento Sci Chirurg, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] European Inst Oncol, Milan, Italy
[3] Policlin Univ A Gemelli, Rome, Italy
[4] Ctr Onkol Ziemi Lubelskej, Lublin, Poland
[5] Pomeranian Med Univ, Szczecin, Poland
[6] Inst Marii Sklodowskiej Curie, Ctr Oncol, Warsaw, Poland
[7] Univ Athens, Athens, Greece
[8] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Rigshosp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[10] Ctr Francois Baclesse, F-14021 Caen, France
[11] Novartis Pharmaceut, Basel, Switzerland
[12] Novartis Pharmaceut, Florham Pk, NJ USA
[13] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
关键词:
MICROTUBULE-STABILIZING AGENTS;
EPOTHILONES;
MECHANISM;
TUBULIN;
TRIAL;
CELLS;
D O I:
10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8082
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Purpose This study compared the efficacy and safety of patupilone with those of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with platinum-refractory or -resistant epithelial ovarian, primary fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with three or fewer prior regimens were eligible if they had received first-line taxane/platinum-based combination chemotherapy and were platinum refractory or resistant. Patients were randomly assigned to receive patupilone (10 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks) or PLD (50 mg/m(2) intravenously every 4 weeks). Results A total of 829 patients were randomly assigned (patupilone, n = 412; PLD, n = 417). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS), the primary end point, between the patupilone and PLD arms (P = .195; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.09), with median OS rates of 13.2 and 12.7 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months for both arms. The overall response rate (all partial responses) was higher in the patupilone arm than in the PLD arm (15.5% v 7.9%; odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.36 to 3.29), although disease control rates were similar (59.5% v 56.3%, respectively). Frequently observed adverse events (AEs) of any grade included diarrhea (85.3%) and peripheral neuropathy (39.3%) in the patupilone arm and mucositis/stomatitis (43%) and hand-foot syndrome (41.8%) in the PLD arm. Conclusion Patupilone did not demonstrate significant improvement in OS compared with the active control, PLD. No new or unexpected serious AEs were identified. J Clin Oncol 30: 3841-3847. (C) 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:3841 / 3847
页数:7
相关论文