A COMPARISON STUDY OF PRESSURE VESSEL DESIGN USING DIFFERENT STANDARDS

被引:0
|
作者
Askestrand, Frode Tjelta [1 ]
Gudmestad, Ove Tobias [2 ]
机构
[1] IKM Ocean Design AS, Sandnes, Norway
[2] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Several codes are currently available for design and analysis of pressure vessels. Two of the main contributors are the American Society of Mechanical Engineers providing the ASME VIII code, Ref /4/ and the Technical Committee for standardization in Brussels providing the European Standard, Ref /2/. Methods written in bold letters will be considered in the discussion presented in this paper. The ASME VIII code, Ref /4/, contains three divisions covering different pressure ranges: Division 1: up to 200 bar (3000 psi) Division 2: in general Division 3: for pressure above 690 bar (10000 psi) In this paper the ASME division 2, Part 5, "design by analysis" will be considered. This part is also referred to in the DNV-OS-F101, Ref /3/, for offshore pressure containing components. Here different analysis methods are described, such as: Elastic Stress Analysis Limit Load Analysis Elastic Plastic Analysis The Elastic Stress Analysis method with stress categorization has been introduced to the industry for many years and has been widely used in design of pressure vessels. However, in the latest issue (2007/2010) of ASME VIII div. 2, this method is not recommended for heavy wall constructions as it might generate non-conservative analysis results. Heavy wall constructions are defined by: (R/t <= 4)with dimensions as illustrated in Figure 1. [GRAPHICS] In the case of heavy wall constructions the Limit Load Analysis or the Elastic-plastic method shall be used. In this paper focus will be on the Elastic-plastic method while the Limit Load Analysis will not be considered. Experience from recent projects at IKM Ocean Design indicates that the industry has not been fully aware of the new analysis philosophy mentioned in the 2007 issue of ASME VIII div.2. The Elastic Stress Analysis method is still (2012) being used for heavy wall constructions. The NS-EN 13445-3; 2009, Ref /2/, provides two different methodologies for design by analysis: Direct Route Method based on stress categories. The method based on stress categories is similar to the Elastic Stress Analysis method from ASME VIII div. 2 and it will therefore not be considered in this paper.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DESIGN OF PRESSURE VESSEL FOR CYCLIC OPERATION
    EASTWOOD, WM
    ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND DESIGN, 1970, 13 (11): : 1375 - &
  • [42] Intelligent Design Research of Pressure Vessel
    Xi, Pingyuan
    Zhao, Fuzhou
    ADVANCED RESEARCH ON INTELLIGENT MATERIALS AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 321 : 204 - +
  • [43] Software for pressure vessel design is upgraded
    不详
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 1996, 17 (5-6): : 317 - 317
  • [44] THERMAL PROBLEMS IN PRESSURE VESSEL DESIGN
    TORIELLI, E
    ROCCA, F
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1966, 4 (05) : 504 - &
  • [45] The four tenets of pressure vessel design
    Megonnell, Neal
    Journal of New England Water Environment Association, 2024, 58 (02): : 28 - 31
  • [46] Automated pressure-vessel design
    Deitz, D
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 119 (11) : 92 - 94
  • [47] Welding in Pressure Vessel and Pipeline Construction, and Present Standards.
    Pressel, Kurt
    Schweissen und Schneiden/Welding and Cutting, 1975, 27 (01): : 14 - 16
  • [48] DEVELOPMENT AND PROSPECT ON CHINESE CODES AND STANDARDS OF TRANSPORTABLE PRESSURE VESSEL
    Xue, Xiaolong
    Tang, Xiaoying
    Lu, Hongliang
    Zhou, Weiming
    ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE - 2015, VOL 1B, 2015,
  • [49] A COMPARISON OF NATIONAL STANDARDS OF SOUND PRESSURE
    TORR, GR
    JARVIS, DR
    METROLOGIA, 1989, 26 (04) : 253 - 256
  • [50] Fatigue comparison of different high pressure materials and design consequences
    Poelzl, Manfred
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE 2007, VOL 5, 2008, : 95 - 99