Establishing a marine conservation baseline for the insular Caribbean

被引:15
|
作者
Knowles, John E. [1 ]
Doyle, Emma [2 ]
Schill, Steven R. [1 ]
Roth, Lynnette M. [1 ]
Milam, Amy [3 ]
Raber, George T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Nature Conservancy, Caribbean Program, Coral Gables, FL 33134 USA
[2] Gulf & Caribbean Fisheries Inst, Marathon, FL 33050 USA
[3] World Conservat Monitoring Ctr, United Nations Environm Programme, Cambridge CB3 0DL, England
[4] Univ So Mississippi, Dept Geog & Geol, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 USA
关键词
Marine protected areas; Insular Caribbean; Conservation targets; PROTECTED AREAS; CORAL-REEFS; PROGRESS; TARGETS; COASTAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Marine protected areas are a primary strategy for the conservation of marine habitats and species across the globe. In small island developing states, they often exceed their terrestrial counterparts in both number and area. To assess their effectiveness as a conservation measure over time, the accurate and up-to-date representation of marine protected areas through spatial and tabular data is imperative in order to establish baselines. Various regional and global agreements have set specific protection targets and these require spatial reporting on protected areas as an indicator of progress. For the insular Caribbean region, this study considers progress towards global Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity which is to conserve at least 10% of coastal and marine areas, and progress towards the regional target of the Caribbean Challenge Initiative (CCI) to protect "at least 20% of nearshore marine and coastal habitats", both aiming for a 2020 deadline. Progress towards these targets differs widely depending on the accuracy of the clatasets and the methods used. In an effort to update the current baseline of protection within the insular Caribbean, multiple governments, the Nature Conservancy and the Caribbean Marine Protected Area Management Network and Forum collaborated to develop a single insular Caribbean protected area dataset with accurate boundary information and the best available ecoregional and political boundaries. This study represents the most in-depth and spatially accurate effort to date to determine marine protected area coverage in the insular Caribbean. It is found that some form of marine management has been designated for around 7.1% of our study area in the insular Caribbean; progress towards Aichi Target 11 averaged among sovereign states within the insular Caribbean stands at approximately 3.25% and only three of the 10 participating governments in the CCI have reached their 20% target. Ocean protection was further assessed across the 25 governments and the three marine ecoregions by four different marine zones. Recommendations are made on regional to global cooperation for data sharing and reporting on indicators, highlighting possible directions to fill marine conservation gaps in the insular Caribbean. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 97
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Extinction risk and conservation of marine bony shorefishes of the Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico
    Linardich, Christi
    Ralph, Gina M.
    Ross Robertson, David
    Harwell, Heather
    Polidoro, Beth A.
    Lindeman, Kenyon C.
    Carpenter, Kent E.
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 29 (01) : 85 - 101
  • [22] Reef Life Survey: Establishing the ecological basis for conservation of shallow marine life
    Edgar, Graham J.
    Cooper, Antonia
    Baker, Susan C.
    Barker, William
    Barrett, Neville S.
    Becerro, Mikel A.
    Bates, Amanda E.
    Brock, Danny
    Ceccarelli, Daniela M.
    Clausius, Ella
    Davey, Marlene
    Davis, Tom R.
    Day, Paul B.
    Green, Andrew
    Griffiths, Samuel R.
    Hicks, Jamie
    Hinojosa, Ivan A.
    Jones, Ben K.
    Kininmonth, Stuart
    Larkin, Meryl F.
    Lazzari, Natali
    Lefcheck, Jonathan S.
    Ling, Scott D.
    Mooney, Peter
    Oh, Elizabeth
    Perez-Matus, Alejandro
    Pocklington, Jacqueline B.
    Riera, Rodrigo
    Sanabria-Fernandez, Jose A.
    Seroussi, Yanir
    Shaw, Ian
    Shields, Derek
    Shields, Joe
    Smith, Margo
    Soler, German A.
    Stuart-Smith, Jemina
    Turnbull, John
    Stuart-Smith, Rick D.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 252
  • [23] Valuation of marine and coastal ecosystem services as a tool for conservation: The case of Martinique in the Caribbean
    Failler, Pierre
    Petre, Elise
    Binet, Thomas
    Marechal, Jean-Philippe
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 11 : 67 - 75
  • [24] NATURAL CONSERVATION OF INSULAR PLANKTON
    BODEN, BP
    NATURE, 1952, 169 (4304) : 697 - 699
  • [25] The environmental factors impact on the conservation of an historic marine quay-a baseline study
    Antunes, A. C.
    Coroado, J.
    Boaventura, D.
    Rocha, F.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 22 (12) : 9563 - 9569
  • [26] Ensuring local stakeholder support for marine conservation: establishing a locally-managed marine area network in Aceh
    Syakur, A.
    Wibowo, J. T.
    Firmansyah, F.
    Azam, I.
    Linkie, M.
    ORYX, 2012, 46 (04) : 516 - 524
  • [27] Radionuclides in marine macroalgae from Amchitka and Kiska Islands in the Aleutians: establishing a baseline for future biomonitoring
    Burger, Joanna
    Gochfeld, Michael
    Kosson, David S.
    Powers, Charles W.
    Jewett, Stephen
    Friedlander, Barry
    Chenelot, Heloise
    Volz, Conrad D.
    Jeitner, Christian
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2006, 91 (1-2) : 27 - 40
  • [28] Setting a Baseline for Caribbean Fisheries
    Baisre, Julio A.
    JOURNAL OF ISLAND & COASTAL ARCHAEOLOGY, 2010, 5 (01): : 120 - 147
  • [29] Establishing the mental health baseline
    Frankel, S
    PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2004, 47 (02) : 262 - 265
  • [30] The potential of marginal coastal nursery habitats for the conservation of a culturally important Caribbean marine species
    Stieglitz, Thomas C.
    Dujon, Antoine M.
    Peel, Joanne R.
    Amice, Erwan
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2020, 26 (05) : 565 - 574