Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Procedure for Synchronous Radical Resection of Liver Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Comparative Study

被引:43
|
作者
Hu, Ming-gen [1 ]
Ou-yang, Cai-guo [2 ]
Zhao, Guo-dong [1 ]
Xu, Da-bin [2 ]
Liu, Rong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army, Gen Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] Aerosp Ctr Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
colorectal cancer; synchronous liver metastasis; laparoscopy; laparotomy; one stage; head-to-head comparison; MULTIINSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; HEPATECTOMY; SELECTION; THERAPY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0b013e31825af6b2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) along with synchronous liver metastases has been attempted and reported in multiple single series. In this study, we aimed to examine the feasibility, procedural safety, and oncological integrity of 1-stage totally laparoscopic procedure for the radical resection of liver metastatic CRC in a head-to-head comparison with the 1-stage open procedure simultaneously. Methods: The patients who underwent selective 1-stage concomitant resection of CRC and synchronous liver metastases between January 2004 and December 2008 (laparoscopy group, n = 13) were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Patients receiving open 1-stage resection (laparotomy group) were retrospectively included at the ratio of 1:1 (n = 13 out of 71), matching the laparoscopy group in sex, age, body mass index, site and stage of primary tumor, location and size of liver metastases, and adjuvant therapies. Results: All the thirteen 1-stage laparoscopic procedures were successfully completed, without conversion to open procedure or additional incision. The operative duration of laparoscopic procedure was shorter than that of open procedure (313 +/- 44 vs. 350 +/- 46 min, P < 0.05). The volume of blood loss was comparable between the 2 groups (259 +/- 111 vs. 273 +/- 95 mL, P > 0.05). Patients undergoing laparoscopic procedure resumed off-bed activities, bowel movement, and oral intake earlier than those undergoing open procedure, and also had a shorter hospitalization stay (8.5 +/- 1.9 vs. 11.2 +/- 1.8 d, P < 0.05). Only 1 clinically significant adverse event occurred in a patient who developed bile leak after the laparoscopic resection. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were comparable between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: One-stage synchronous laparoscopic resection of liver metastatic CRC is a feasible, effective, and safe modality in specifically indicated patients, both accelerating postoperative recovery and shortening hospitalization time.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 369
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer resection: peri-operative and early oncological outcomes
    Shipton, K.
    Saha, A.
    Harikrishnan, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 164 - 164
  • [42] Letter to the Editor on: "Trends and outcomes of simultaneous versus staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases"
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    SURGERY, 2022, 172 (05) : 1592 - 1593
  • [43] Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Multicenter study
    Kim, Jongman
    Choi, Gi Hong
    Ryu, Je Ho
    Kim, Dong-Sik
    Lee, Hae Won
    Kim, Ki-Hun
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 80 : S459 - S459
  • [44] Simultaneous resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases is a safe procedure: Outcomes at a single center in Turkey
    Dulundu, Ender
    Attaallah, Wafi
    Tilki, Metin
    Yegen, Cumhur
    Coskun, Safak
    Coskun, Mumin
    Erdim, Aylin
    Tanrikulu, Eda
    Yardimci, Samet
    Gunal, Omer
    BIOSCIENCE TRENDS, 2017, 11 (02) : 235 - 242
  • [45] Propensity score-based analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases
    Cipriani, F.
    Rawashdeh, M.
    Stanton, L.
    Armstrong, T.
    Takhar, A.
    Pearce, N. W.
    Primrose, J.
    Abu Hilal, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (11) : 1504 - 1512
  • [46] Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer and polyps: a cost-effectiveness study
    Jordan, Jake
    Dowson, Henry
    Gage, Heather
    Jackson, Daniel
    Rockall, Timothy
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 6 : 415 - 422
  • [47] Long-term oncologic outcomes for simultaneous resection of synchronous metastatic liver and primary colorectal cancer
    Silberhumer, Gerd R.
    Paty, Philip B.
    Denton, Brian
    Guillem, Jose
    Gonen, Mithat
    Araujo, Raphael L. C.
    Nash, Garret M.
    Temple, Larissa K.
    Allen, Peter J.
    DeMatteo, Ronald P.
    Weiser, Martin R.
    Wong, W. Douglas
    Jarnagin, William R.
    D'Angelica, Michael I.
    Fong, Yuman
    SURGERY, 2016, 160 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [48] Laparoscopic vs open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of surgical margin status and survival
    Miguel Nicolás
    Matías Czerwonko
    Victoria Ardiles
    Rodrigo Sánchez Claria
    Oscar Mazza
    Eduardo de Santibañes
    Juan Pekolj
    Martín de Santibañes
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2022, 407 : 1113 - 1119
  • [49] Laparoscopic vs open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of surgical margin status and survival
    Nicolas, Miguel
    Czerwonko, Matias
    Ardiles, Victoria
    Sanchez Claria, Rodrigo
    Mazza, Oscar
    de Santibanes, Eduardo
    Pekolj, Juan
    de Santibanes, Martin
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (03) : 1113 - 1119
  • [50] Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases
    Tian, Zhi-qiang
    Su, Xiao-fang
    Lin, Zhi-yong
    Wu, Meng-chao
    Wei, Li-xin
    He, Jia
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (51) : 84544 - 84555