Serum carcinoembryonic antigen measurement, abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of colorectal cancer recurrence: a correlative study

被引:13
|
作者
Ozkan, Elgin [1 ]
Soydal, Cigdem [1 ]
Araz, Mine [1 ]
Aras, Gulseren [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Nucl Med, TR-06590 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
F-18-FDG PET/CT; colorectal cancer; recurrent disease; FDG PET/CT; CEA LEVEL; COLON; ADENOCARCINOMA; RESECTION; PATTERNS; SURGERY; RECTUM; CT;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835632ad
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlative role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurement and contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (ceCT) in the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence. Materials and methods A total of 96 patients (40 female, 56 male; mean age, 60.6 +/- 12 years) with a previous diagnosis of CRC underwent F-18-FDG PET/CT on suspicion of recurrence and were evaluated retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were accepted as the presence of increased serum CEA levels or positive findings on abdominal ceCT or both. F-18-FDG PET/CT findings were compared with histopathological findings and/or clinical follow-up data as the gold standard. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1, with increased CEA levels and normal abdominal ceCT; group 2, with normal CEA levels and positive ceCT; and group 3, with increased CEA levels and positive ceCT. Results Whereas sensitivities of CEA, ceCT, and F-18-FDG PET/CT in the three patient groups were calculated as 91, 67, and 96%, specificities were 13, 51, and 62%, respectively. There were 35, 14, and 46 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In separate analyses conducted on the groups, sensitivity of F-18-FDG PET/CT was computed as 100 and 100% and specificity as 88 and 80% for groups 1 and 2. In group 3, which comprised four patients with secondary malignancies, sensitivity and specificity of F-18-FDG PET/CT were 94 and 16%, respectively. Conclusion F-18-FDG PET/CT has an additional role in the detection of CRC recurrence with a higher sensitivity compared with CEA and ceCT alone, and F-18-FDG PET/CT is especially more successful in patients with isolated elevated CEA levels or positive ceCT findings without accompanying CEA elevation. Nucl Med Commun 33:990-994 (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:990 / 994
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic Value of SUVmax Measured by Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Computed Tomography in Patients with Gallbladder Cancer
    Hwang J.P.
    Lim I.
    Na I.I.
    Cho E.H.
    Kim B.I.
    Choi C.W.
    Lim S.M.
    Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014, 48 (2) : 114 - 120
  • [22] Prognostic value of SUVmax measured by Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Computed Tomography in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer
    Hwang, Jae Pil
    Lim, Ilhan
    Chang, Kyoung Jin
    Kim, Byung Il
    Choi, Chang Woon
    Lim, Sang Moo
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 46 (03) : 207 - 214
  • [23] Contrast-enhanced fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas
    Santhosh, Sampath
    Lakshmanan, Ramesh Kumar
    Sonik, Bhavay
    Padmavathy, Rajagopalan
    Gunaseelan, Rajamani Emmanuel
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (02): : 131 - 133
  • [24] Benign metastasizing leiomyoma and findings on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Gosavi, Atul
    Shah, Sneha
    Purandare, Nilendu C.
    Puranik, Ameya
    Agrawal, Archi
    Rangarajan, Venkatesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (01): : 68 - 70
  • [25] Value of contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in detection and presurgical assessment of pancreatic cancer: A prospective study
    Buchs, Nicolas C.
    Buehler, Leo
    Bucher, Pascal
    Willi, Jean-Pierre
    Frossard, Jean-Louis
    Roth, Arnaud D.
    Addeo, Pietro
    Rosset, Antoine
    Terraz, Sylvain
    Becker, Christoph D.
    Ratib, Osman
    Morel, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 (04) : 657 - 662
  • [26] Fluorine-18 labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of cat scratch disease: a case report
    Hu, X.
    Hu, H.
    Yu, R.
    Cai, X.
    Yang, P.
    Cai, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2022, 20 (04): : 883 - 885
  • [27] Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodule: a scoping review
    Divisi, Duilio
    Zaccagna, Gino
    De Vico, Andrea
    Aquilini, Piero
    Crisci, Roberto
    AME SURGICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 3
  • [28] Diagnostic value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with fever of unknown origin
    Sheng, Ji-Fang
    Sheng, Zi-Ke
    Shen, Xiao-Min
    Bi, Sheng
    Li, Jun-Jie
    Sheng, Guo-Ping
    Yu, Hai-Ying
    Huang, Hai-Jun
    Liu, Jun
    Xiang, Dai-Rong
    Dong, Meng-Jie
    Zhao, Kui
    Li, Lan-Juan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 22 (01) : 112 - 116
  • [29] Gliomatosis cerebri mimicking encephalitis evaluated using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography
    Kamaleshwaran, Koramadai Karuppusamy
    Krishnan, Vijayan
    Mohanan, Vyshakh
    Shibu, Deepu
    Shinto, Ajit Sugunan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (01): : 84 - 85
  • [30] The diagnostic yield of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in recurrent testicular seminoma
    Bantis, Athanasios
    Sountoulides, Petros
    Metaxa, Linda
    Pavlidis, Pavlos
    Aggelonidou, Eleni
    Arif, Halil
    Zisimopoulos, Athanasios
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2016, 8 (04) : 496 - 499