A cost-benefit analysis of generating electricity from biomass

被引:21
|
作者
O'Mahoney, Amy [1 ]
Thorne, Fiona [2 ]
Denny, Eleanor [1 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dept Econ, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] TEAGASC, Rural Econ Res Ctr, Dublin 15, Ireland
关键词
Cost benefit analysis; Cofiring; Renewable generation; ENERGY; COAL; COCOMBUSTION; EMISSIONS; IRELAND; PEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A key challenge internationally is the design of future electricity systems which will bring about emissions savings and fuel security at least cost. Peat is used to generate electricity in several EU countries, mainly to take advantage of indigenous resources and increase fuel mix diversity. The Irish government has introduced a target of 30% cofiring of peat and biomass by 2015. This paper assesses the feasibility of achieving this target by calculating the available indigenous biomass resource capable of being cofired; the cost of meeting the target; the benefits in terms of carbon abatement; and finally the present value in economic terms of meeting the 'target: Results demonstrate that Ireland has only half the necessary resource to meet the 30% target and that the net cost of doing so is greater than the cost of what is currently being paid for peat, in all of the scenarios considered. Thus, it is concluded that while it may be technically possible to meet the target by combining national resources with imported biomass this is never the least cost option, and as a result the targeted focus of Government policy may need to be reconsidered. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 354
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementation of Dynamic Tariffs in the Portuguese Electricity System - Preliminary Results of a Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Saraiva, J. T.
    Fidalgo, J. N.
    Pinto, R. B.
    Soares, R.
    Santos Afonso, J.
    Pires, G.
    2016 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET (EEM), 2016,
  • [42] COST-BENEFIT
    RUSSELL, JGB
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1987, 60 (715): : 731 - 731
  • [43] GENERATING ELECTRICITY FROM BIOMASS AND WASTE
    MAUNDER, DH
    BROWN, KA
    RICHARDS, KM
    POWER ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1995, 9 (04): : 188 - 196
  • [44] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS - MISHAN,EJ
    OPSCHOOR, JB
    ECONOMIST, 1972, 120 (01): : 83 - 86
  • [45] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN FORESTRY SECTOR
    GRUT, M
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1975, 43 (02) : 187 - 204
  • [46] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND UTILITY THEORY
    RIVETT, P
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1978, 29 (08) : 821 - 821
  • [47] AI IN FORESTRY - A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    Ivanova, Maya
    WOODEMA 2024 - GREEN DEAL INITIATIVES, SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT, MARKET DEMANDS, AND NEW PRODUCTION PERSPECTIVES IN THE FORESTRY-BASED SECTOR, 2024, : 139 - 144
  • [48] TRANSPARENCY IN AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    Cecot, Caroline
    Hahn, Robert W.
    ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2020, 72 (02) : 157 - 206
  • [49] Value Typology in Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Baum, Seth D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2012, 21 (04) : 499 - 524
  • [50] A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the ENIGMA Trial
    Graham, Alison M.
    Myles, Paul S.
    Leslie, Kate
    Chan, Matthew T. V.
    Paech, Michael J.
    Peyton, Philip
    El Dawlatly, Abdelazeem A.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 115 (02) : 265 - 272