Asymmetric magnetic reconnection with a flow shear and applications to the magnetopause

被引:51
|
作者
Doss, C. E. [1 ]
Komar, C. M. [1 ,2 ]
Cassak, P. A. [1 ]
Wilder, F. D. [3 ]
Eriksson, S. [3 ]
Drake, J. F. [4 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[3] Univ Colorado Boulder, Lab Atmospher & Space Phys, Boulder, CO USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Inst Res Electrons & Appl Phys, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
magnetic reconnection; flow shear; polar cusps; magnetopause; asymmetric; HIGH-LATITUDE MAGNETOPAUSE; SOLAR-WIND INTERACTION; NORTHWARD IMF; PLASMASPHERIC PLUME; COLLISIONLESS RECONNECTION; DAYSIDE MAGNETOPAUSE; TEARING INSTABILITY; EARTHS MAGNETOPAUSE; TAIL MAGNETOPAUSE; PLASMA-FLOW;
D O I
10.1002/2015JA021489
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We perform a systematic theoretical and numerical study of antiparallel two-dimensional magnetic reconnection with asymmetries in the plasma density and reconnecting magnetic field strength in addition to a bulk flow shear across the reconnection site in the plane of the reconnecting fields, which commonly occurs at planetary magnetospheres. We analytically predict the speed at which an isolated X line is convected by the flow, the reconnection rate, and the critical flow speed at which reconnection no longer takes place for arbitrary reconnecting magnetic field strengths, densities, and upstream flow speeds, and we confirm the results with two-fluid numerical simulations. The predictions and simulation results counter the prevailing model of reconnection at Earth's dayside magnetopause which says reconnection occurs with a stationary X line for sub-Alfvenic magnetosheath flow, reconnection occurs but the X line convects for magnetosheath flows between the Alfven speed and double the Alfven speed, and reconnection does not occur for magnetosheath flows greater than double the Alfven speed. In particular, we find that X line motion is governed by momentum conservation from the upstream flows, which are weighted differently in asymmetric systems, so the X line convects for generic conditions including sub-Alfvenic upstream speeds. For the reconnection rate, as with symmetric reconnection, it drops with increasing flow shear and there is a cutoff speed above which reconnection is not predominant. However, while the cutoff condition for symmetric reconnection is that the difference in flows on the two sides of the reconnection site is twice the Alfven speed, we find asymmetries cause the cutoff speed for asymmetric reconnection to be higher than twice the asymmetric form of the Alfven speed. The stronger the asymmetries, the more the cutoff exceeds double the asymmetric Alfven speed. This is due to the fact that in asymmetric reconnection, the plasma with the smaller mass flux into the dissipation region contributes a smaller mass to the dissipation region, so the effect of its flow on opposing the release of energy by the reconnected magnetic fields is diminished and the reconnection is not suppressed to the extent previously thought. The results compare favorably with an observation of reconnection at Earth's polar cusps during a period of northward interplanetary magnetic field, where reconnection occurs despite the magnetosheath flow speed being more than twice the magnetosheath Alfven speed, the previously proposed suppression condition. These results are expected to be of broad importance for magnetospheric physics of Earth and other planets; particular applications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:7748 / 7763
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Asymmetric shear flow effects on magnetic field configuration within oppositely directed solar wind reconnection exhausts
    Eriksson, S.
    Gosling, J. T.
    Phan, T. D.
    Blush, L. M.
    Simunac, K. D. C.
    Krauss-Varban, D.
    Szabo, A.
    Luhmann, J. G.
    Russell, C. T.
    Galvin, A. B.
    Acuna, M. H.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2009, 114
  • [42] Theoretical studies of low and high frequency electrostatic solitary waves in the magnetopause associated with asymmetric magnetic reconnection
    Bharuthram, R.
    Rufai, O. R.
    Maharaj, S. K.
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2022, 69 (08) : 3008 - 3018
  • [43] Magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause: A fundamental process and manifold properties
    Otto, A.
    Reviews of Geophysics, 1995, 33 (01):
  • [45] Hall effect on magnetic reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause
    Morales, LF
    Dasso, S
    Gómez, DO
    Mininni, P
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2005, 67 (17-18) : 1821 - 1826
  • [46] Secondary Magnetic Reconnection at Earth's Flank Magnetopause
    Tang, B. B.
    Li, W. Y.
    Wang, C.
    Khotyaintsev, Yu. V.
    Graham, D. B.
    Zhang, Q. H.
    Sun, T. R.
    Li, H.
    Wang, X. Y.
    Trattner, K. J.
    Giles, B. L.
    Lindqvist, P. A.
    Ergun, R. E.
    Burch, J. L.
    FRONTIERS IN ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2021, 8
  • [47] Magnetic reconnection and plasmoid events in the magnetopause boundary layer
    Liu, ZX
    Zhang, H
    Chen, T
    Pu, ZY
    Fu, SY
    MAGNETOSPHERIC RESEARCH WITH ADVANCED TECHNIQUES, 1998, 9 : 187 - 192
  • [48] MAVEN Observations of Magnetic Reconnection at Martian Induced Magnetopause
    Wang, Jing
    Yu, Jiang
    Xu, Xiaojun
    Cui, Jun
    Cao, Jinbin
    Ye, Yudong
    Xu, Qi
    Wang, Ming
    Zhou, Zilu
    Chang, Qing
    Xu, Jiaying
    Wang, Xing
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (21)
  • [49] Magnetospheric ion influence on magnetic reconnection at the duskside magnetopause
    Fuselier, S. A.
    Burch, J. L.
    Cassak, P. A.
    Goldstein, J.
    Gomez, R. G.
    Goodrich, K.
    Lewis, W. S.
    Malaspina, D.
    Mukherjee, J.
    Nakamura, R.
    Petrinec, S. M.
    Russell, C. T.
    Strangeway, R. J.
    Torbert, R. B.
    Trattner, K. J.
    Valek, P.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (04) : 1435 - 1442
  • [50] Low-latitude dayside magnetopause and boundary layer for high magnetic shear .2. Occurrence of magnetic reconnection
    Phan, TD
    Paschmann, G
    Sonnerup, BUO
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1996, 101 (A4) : 7817 - 7828