The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers

被引:29
|
作者
You, Weiqiang [1 ]
Sheng, Nengquan [1 ]
Yan, Li [1 ]
Chen, Hongqi [1 ]
Gong, Jianfeng [1 ]
He, Zhenghui [2 ]
Zheng, Kaiwen [2 ]
Chen, Zhaohuan [2 ]
Wang, Yafang [2 ]
Tan, Gewen [1 ]
Xie, Lu [3 ]
Wang, Zhigang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Peoples Hosp 6, Dept Gen Surg, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Ctr Bioinformat Technol, Shanghai 201203, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF CANCER | 2019年 / 10卷 / 16期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
CRC; CEA; CA19-9; CA242; CA125; prognosis; CARBOHYDRATE ANTIGEN 19-9; CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN; CEA; STATISTICS; ASSOCIATION; RECURRENCE; CA125;
D O I
10.7150/jca.31660
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Preoperative serum tumor markers have been widely used to predict prognosis in stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, few previous studies addressed the effect of increased preoperative numbers of tumor markers. Methods: Patients with stage II and III CRC who underwent curative resection were included from January 2009 to October 2015. The relationship between serum tumor markers and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. DFS and OS were compared in stage II and III CRC. Results: The median follow-up was 45 months. In this study, 735 enrolled patients were assessed based on the numbers of increased tumor markers. We found that these increased tumor markers were closely associated with clinical stage, T stage, N stage, tumor location, pathology type, differentiation, lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion (all p values < 0.05). Furthermore, the number of increased tumor markers directly affected the survival of patients with CRC after curative surgery. The 3-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 84.0% and 91.0%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (42.9% and 37.8%, respectively) (p < 0.05). The 5-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 75.9% and 77.9%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (31.7% and 23.6%, respectively). Interestingly, our results suggested that stage III CRC patients with a score of 0 had longer DFS and OS times than stage II patients with scores of 3 and 4. Further analysis revealed statistically significant differences in OS (p < 0.05) but not in DFS. Conclusions: The number of increased tumor markers could significantly predict prognosis in stage II and III CRC. In addition, these increased tumor markers had direct impacts on metastasis as well as the recurrence status and survival time of stage II and III CRC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:3757 / 3766
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MUC12 mRNA expression is an independent marker of prognosis in stage II and stage III colorectal cancer
    Matsuyama, Takatoshi
    Ishikawa, Toshiaki
    Mogushi, Kaoru
    Yoshida, Tsuyoshi
    Iida, Satoru
    Uetake, Hiroyuki
    Mizushima, Hiroshi
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Sugihara, Kenichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 127 (10) : 2292 - 2299
  • [22] Development and validation of a collagen signature to predict the prognosis of patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer
    Dong, Shumin
    Wang, Huaiming
    Ji, Hongli
    Hu, Yaowen
    Zhao, Shuhan
    Yan, Botao
    Wang, Guangxing
    Lin, Zexi
    Zhu, Weifeng
    Lu, Jianping
    Cheng, Jiaxin
    Wu, Zhida
    Zhu, Qiong
    Zhuo, Shuangmu
    Chen, Gang
    Yan, Jun
    ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (05)
  • [23] Prognostic value of tumor size in stage II and III colorectal cancer in Tunisian population
    Nesrine, Mejri
    Manel, Dridi
    Soumaya, Labidi
    Houda, El Benna
    Nouha, Daoud
    Mehdi, Afrit
    Hamouda, Boussen
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [24] Radically resected stage III colorectal cancer: sidedness and prognosis
    Massucci, M.
    Francesca, A.
    Veronica, M.
    Palloni, A.
    Frega, G.
    Ferracin, M.
    Porcellini, E.
    Brandi, G.
    Biasco, G.
    Garajova, I.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [25] Prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers in gastric cancer
    Huang, Ze-Bo
    Zhou, Xin
    Xu, Jun
    Du, Yi-Ping
    Zhu, Wei
    Wang, Jian
    Shu, Yong-Qian
    Liu, Ping
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 5 (02): : 170 - 176
  • [26] The Influence of Mucinous Histology on the Prognosis of Stage II and III Colorectal Cancers
    Aydin, Isa Caner
    Torun, Mehmet
    Sonmez, Mehmet Resit
    Ademoglu, Serkan
    Sunar, Ahmet Orhan
    Uzun, Orhan
    Gulmez, Selcuk
    Polat, Erdal
    Duman, Mustafa
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (03):
  • [27] Preoperative Tumor Markers Independently Predict Survival in Stage III Gastric Cancer Patients: Should We Include Tumor Markers in AJCC Staging?
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Wang, Wei
    Lin, Jun-Peng
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-bin
    Lu, Jun
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Cao, Long-long
    Lin, Mi
    Tu, Ruhong
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    Zhou, Zhi-wei
    Li, Ping
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (09) : 2703 - 2712
  • [28] Preoperative Tumor Markers Independently Predict Survival in Stage III Gastric Cancer Patients: Should We Include Tumor Markers in AJCC Staging?
    Jian-Xian Lin
    Wei Wang
    Jun-Peng Lin
    Jian-Wei Xie
    Jia-bin Wang
    Jun Lu
    Qi-Yue Chen
    Long-long Cao
    Mi Lin
    Ruhong Tu
    Chao-Hui Zheng
    Chang-Ming Huang
    Zhi-wei Zhou
    Ping Li
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 2703 - 2712
  • [29] Adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colorectal cancer
    de Gramont, Aimery
    Tournigand, Christophe
    Andre, Thierry
    Larsen, Annette K.
    Louvet, Christophe
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2007, 34 (02) : S37 - S40
  • [30] Postoperative circulating tumor DNA as markers of recurrence risk in stages II to III colorectal cancer
    Gong Chen
    Junjie Peng
    Qian Xiao
    Hao-Xiang Wu
    Xiaojun Wu
    Fulong Wang
    Liren Li
    Peirong Ding
    Qi Zhao
    Yaqi Li
    Da Wang
    Yang Shao
    Hua Bao
    Zhizhong Pan
    Ke-Feng Ding
    Sanjun Cai
    Feng Wang
    Rui-Hua Xu
    Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 14