Maximizing the Spectral and Temporal Benefits of Two Clinically Used Sound Processing Strategies for Cochlear Implants

被引:4
|
作者
Won, Jong Ho [1 ]
Nie, Kaibao [2 ]
Drennan, Ward R. [2 ]
Rubinstein, Jay T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
TRENDS IN AMPLIFICATION | 2012年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
cochlear implant; spectral and temporal sensitivity; sound processing strategy; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; RIPPLE RESOLUTION; NORMAL-HEARING; FINE-STRUCTURE; LISTENERS; NOISE;
D O I
10.1177/1084713812467855
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous work showed that the Fidelity120 processing strategy provides better spectral sensitivity, while the HiResolution processing strategy can deliver more detailed temporal information for Advanced Bionics cochlear implant users. The goal of this study was to develop a new sound processing strategy by maximizing the spectral benefit of Fidelity120 and the temporal benefit of HiResolution to improve both aspects of hearing. Using acoustic simulations of Fidelity120 and HiResolution strategies, a dual-processing strategy was created by combining Fidelity120 in the low frequency channels and HiResolution in the high frequency channels. Compared to Fidelity120, the dual processing provided an improvement in performance for Schroeder-phase discrimination at 200 Hz and temporal modulation detection at 200 Hz with the cost of a slightly decreased performance for spectral-ripple discrimination relative to Fidelity120. Spectral-ripple discrimination was better with the dual processing than with HiResolution. However, no benefit for speech perception in noise was found for the dual-processing strategy over Fidelity 120 or HiResolution in our preliminary tests. Some other more optimal combination of Fidelity120 and HiResolution may be required to maximize the spectral and temporal benefits to yield improved speech perception.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 210
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of Temporal Fine Structure Processing Among Older Adults With Cochlear Implants
    Sladen, Douglas P.
    Peterson, Ann
    Olund, Amy
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (03) : 327 - 333
  • [32] Temporal Processing and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingual Adult Users of Cochlear Implants
    Cesur, Sidika
    Derinsu, Ufuk
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [33] OPERATING RANGES AND INTENSITY PSYCHOPHYSICS FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTS - IMPLICATIONS FOR SPEECH PROCESSING STRATEGIES
    PFINGST, BE
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1984, 110 (03) : 140 - 144
  • [34] Formant priority channel selection for an "n-of-m" sound processing strategy for cochlear implants
    Saba, Juliana N.
    Ali, Hussnain
    Hansen, John H. L.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 144 (06): : 3371 - 3380
  • [36] Spectral and Temporal Measures in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users: On the Mechanism of Electroacoustic Hearing Benefits
    Golub, Justin S.
    Won, Jong Ho
    Drennan, Ward R.
    Worman, Tina D.
    Rubinstein, Jay T.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2012, 33 (02) : 147 - 153
  • [37] An experimental set-up for evaluating new speech processing strategies for cochlear implants
    Geurts, L
    Wouters, J
    Govaerts, G
    Peeters, S
    Snellings, J
    VanCompernolle, D
    ACUSTICA, 1996, 82 : S221 - S221
  • [38] Consideration of Temporal Masking in Cochlear Implant Speech Processing Strategies: the TPACE Strategy
    Kludt, E.
    Lenarz, T.
    Buechner, A.
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2014, 59 : S752 - S752
  • [39] Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: A comparison of sound-processing strategies
    Vandali, AE
    Sucher, C
    Tsang, DJ
    McKay, CM
    Chew, JWD
    McDermott, HJ
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 117 (05): : 3126 - 3138
  • [40] Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants
    Apoux, Frederic
    Youngdahl, Carla L.
    Yoho, Sarah E.
    Healy, Eric W.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2015, 138 (03): : 1469 - 1480